Brian Todd Carver

Clemson University - School of Accountancy & Legal Studies

Clemson, SC 29634

United States

SCHOLARLY PAPERS

4

DOWNLOADS
Rank 33,925

SSRN RANKINGS

Top 33,925

in Total Papers Downloads

1,474

SSRN CITATIONS
Rank 43,703

SSRN RANKINGS

Top 43,703

in Total Papers Citations

1

CROSSREF CITATIONS

13

Scholarly Papers (4)

1.

Nonprofessional Investors’ Reactions to the PCAOB's Proposed Changes to the Standard Audit Report

Number of pages: 60 Posted: 13 Mar 2017
Brian Todd Carver and Brad S. Trinkle
Clemson University - School of Accountancy & Legal Studies and Mississippi State University - School of Accountancy
Downloads 728 (37,469)
Citation 6

Abstract:

Loading...

Critical Audit Matters, Standard Audit Report, Investor’s Perception, Readability, Valuation Judgment

2.

When Bonding Fails: Audit Firm Oversight of US-Listed Chinese Companies

Number of pages: 58 Posted: 03 Apr 2014 Last Revised: 04 Apr 2014
University of Tennessee, Clemson University - School of Accountancy & Legal Studies, University of Southern California and University of Tennessee
Downloads 463 (67,193)
Citation 8

Abstract:

Loading...

Audit quality, Audit firm oversight, PCAOB inspections, Chinese companies, Fraud

3.

Market Reaction to the PCAOB's Inability to Conduct Foreign Inspections

Number of pages: 46 Posted: 18 Aug 2011
Joseph V. Carcello, Brian Todd Carver and Terry L. Neal
University of Tennessee, Clemson University - School of Accountancy & Legal Studies and University of Tennessee
Downloads 283 (117,797)
Citation 7

Abstract:

Loading...

PCAOB inspections, Foreign inspections, Market reaction

4.

Recent Auditor Downgrade Activity and Changes in Clients’ Discretionary Accruals

Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2011
Posted: 30 Jan 2011 Last Revised: 22 Aug 2011
Clemson University - School of Accountancy & Legal Studies, Clemson University and Auburn University - School of Accountancy

Abstract:

Loading...

Audit Quality, Auditor Switches, Discretionary Accruals, Financial Reporting Quality