Allen K. Yu

Center for Internet and Society

Non-Resident Fellow

Stanford, CA 94305

United States

SCHOLARLY PAPERS

4

DOWNLOADS

486

SSRN CITATIONS

0

CROSSREF CITATIONS

6

Scholarly Papers (4)

1.

The En Banc Federal Circuit’s Written Description Requirement: Time for the Supreme Court to Reverse Again?

Allen K. Yu, Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 33, No. 3 p. 895-968 (February 2012)
Number of pages: 74 Posted: 03 Apr 2011 Last Revised: 09 Sep 2014
Allen K. Yu
Center for Internet and Society
Downloads 166 (349,100)

Abstract:

Loading...

written description requirement, subject matter eligibility, enablement, patent quid pro quo, 35 u.s.c. 112, disclosure requirement, Ariad Pharms., Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co., 595 F.3d 1329 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

2.

Within Subject Matter Eligibility - A Disease and a Cure

Southern California Law Review, Vol. 84, p. 387, 2011
Number of pages: 60 Posted: 06 Aug 2010 Last Revised: 25 May 2014
Allen K. Yu
Center for Internet and Society
Downloads 144 (392,588)

Abstract:

Loading...

subject matter eligibility, laws of nature, natural phenomena, abstract ideas, section 101, 35 u.s.c. 101, patentability, Gottschalk v. Benson, Parker v. Flook, Diamond v. Diehr, Bilski v. Kappos

3.

Enhancing Legal Aid Access Through an Open Source Commons Model

Harvard Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 20, No. 2, Spring 2007
Number of pages: 30 Posted: 20 Aug 2010
Allen K. Yu
Center for Internet and Society
Downloads 99 (519,689)

Abstract:

Loading...

commons, legal aid, open source

4.

Why it Might Be Time to Eliminate Genomic Patents, Together with the Natural Extracts Doctrine Supporting Such Patents

IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 47, No. 5, 2007
Number of pages: 97 Posted: 20 Aug 2010 Last Revised: 30 Mar 2013
Allen K. Yu
Center for Internet and Society
Downloads 77 (605,650)

Abstract:

Loading...

gene patents, subject matter eligibility, patents. 35 u.s.c. 101, natural products, patentability, Gottschalk v. Benson, Parker v. Flook, Diamond v. Diehr, Bilski v. Kappos