Jan D. Lüttringhaus

Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law

Mittelweg 187

Hamburg, D-20148

Germany

SCHOLARLY PAPERS

4

DOWNLOADS

1,248

TOTAL CITATIONS

2

Scholarly Papers (4)

1.

Comments on the European Commission’s Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions and Authentic Instruments in Matters of Succession and the Creation of a European Certificate of Succession

Rabel Journal of Comparative and International Private Law (RabelsZ), Vol. 74, No. 3, pp. 522-720, July 2010, Max Planck Private Law Research Paper No. 10/2
Number of pages: 200 Posted: 24 Sep 2010 Last Revised: 19 Nov 2018
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU), Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law (deceased), Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law, Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law, Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law, Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law, Heidelberg University - Faculty of Law, Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law, Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law, Kyoto University - Graduate School of Law, Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law, Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law, Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law, Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law, Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law, Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law, Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law, affiliation not provided to SSRN and affiliation not provided to SSRN
Downloads 441 (141,472)
Citation 2

Abstract:

Loading...

Conflict of laws, jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments, European Union, inheritance, succession

2.

Mehr Freiheit wagen im Versicherungsrecht durch daten- und risikoadjustierte Versicherungstarife – „Pay-as-you-drive“-, „Pay-as-you-live“- und „Smart-Home“-Tarife als Herausforderung für das Versicherungsvertragsrecht – (Risking More Freedom: Data and Risk-based Insurance Tariffs – “Pay-as-you-drive“, “Pay-as-you-live” and “Smart-Home“ Tariffs as a New Challenge for Insurance Contract Law –)

»Mehr Freiheit wagen« – Beiträge zur Emeritierung von Jürgen Basedow, pp. 55-72, Anatol Dutta and Christian Heinze, eds., Mohr Siebeck, 2018, Max Planck Private Law Research Paper No. 17/18
Number of pages: 20 Posted: 26 Oct 2017 Last Revised: 12 Dec 2018
Jan D. Lüttringhaus
Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law
Downloads 369 (173,192)

Abstract:

Loading...

Insurance, insurance contract law, data protection, pay as you drive, pay as you live, smart home, self-tracking, life insurance, motor insurance, risiko- und datenadjustierte Versicherungstrarife, AGB-Kontrolle, Versicherungsvertragsrecht

3.

Übergreifende Begrifflichkeiten im europäischen Zivilverfahrens- und Kollisionsrecht – Grund und Grenzen der rechtsaktsübergreifenden Auslegung dargestellt am Beispiel vertraglicher und außervertraglicher Schuldverhältnisse (Uniform Terminology in European Private International Law)

Rabel Journal of Comparative and International Private Law (RabelsZ), Vol. 77, No. 1, pp. 31-68, January 2013, DOI: 10.1628/003372513X661067, Max Planck Private Law Research Paper No. 12/16
Number of pages: 39 Posted: 01 Sep 2012 Last Revised: 08 May 2014
Jan D. Lüttringhaus
Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law
Downloads 258 (253,204)

Abstract:

Loading...

Rome I, Rome II, Brussels I, autonomous interpretation, private international law, conflict of laws, jurisdiction, ECJ, European Private law, European Union, consumer contracts, employment contracs, insurance contracts, sale, provision of services

4.

Kaufrechtliche Gewährleistungsansprüche bei »ethischen« Produkten und öffentlichen Aussagen zur Corporate Social Responsibility – Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Weite des Beschaffenheitsbegriffs des § 434 BGB (Warranty Claims Based on "Ethical" Products and on Public Corporate Social Responsibility Declarations – The Concept of Quality Under § 434 BGB)

Archiv für die civilistische Praxis (AcP), Vol. 219, No. 1, pp. 29-62, February 2019, DOI: 10.1628/acp-2019-0003, Max Planck Private Law Research Paper No. 20/7
Number of pages: 36 Posted: 22 Jun 2020 Last Revised: 23 Jun 2020
Jan D. Lüttringhaus
Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law
Downloads 180 (356,722)

Abstract:

Loading...

„Ethische“ Produktionsstandards und CSR-Aussagen als Beschaffenheit, Bezugsrahmen der Fortentwicklung des Beschaffenheitsbegriffs, Mangeltatbestände bei „ethischen“ Produkten, Kaufrechtliche Gewährleistungsansprüche