John E. Lopatka

The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law

Lewis Katz Building

University Park, PA 16802

United States

SCHOLARLY PAPERS

22

DOWNLOADS
Rank 24,681

SSRN RANKINGS

Top 24,681

in Total Papers Downloads

2,883

SSRN CITATIONS
Rank 35,602

SSRN RANKINGS

Top 35,602

in Total Papers Citations

12

CROSSREF CITATIONS

10

Scholarly Papers (22)

Economic Authority and the Limits of Expertise in Antitrust Cases

Number of pages: 118 Posted: 27 Feb 2004
William H. Page and John E. Lopatka
University of Florida Levin College of Law and The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law
Downloads 457 (87,431)

Abstract:

Loading...

antitrust, litigation, expert testimony, daubert

Economic Authority and the Limits of Expertise in Antitrust Cases

Cornell Law Review, Vol. 90, p. 617, 2005
Number of pages: 88 Posted: 09 Apr 2007 Last Revised: 22 Sep 2015
William H. Page and John E. Lopatka
University of Florida Levin College of Law and The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law
Downloads 102 (356,630)
Citation 2

Abstract:

Loading...

antitrust, litigation, expert testimony, daubert

2.

Bargaining and Monopolization: In Search of the 'Boundary of Section 2 Liability' between Aspen and Trinko

Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 72, 2005
Number of pages: 38 Posted: 09 Aug 2005 Last Revised: 22 Sep 2015
John E. Lopatka and William H. Page
The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law and University of Florida Levin College of Law
Downloads 266 (159,408)

Abstract:

Loading...

Antitrust, monopolization, bargaining, exclusion, refusal to deal

3.

Microsoft, Monopolization, and Network Externalities: Some Uses and Abuses of Economic Theory in Antitrust Decisionmaking

Antitrust Bulletin, Vol. 40, 1995
Number of pages: 54 Posted: 30 May 2009
John E. Lopatka and William H. Page
The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law and University of Florida Levin College of Law
Downloads 242 (174,824)
Citation 3

Abstract:

Loading...

antitrust, network effects, microsoft, monopolization

4.

The Microsoft Case as a Political Trial

University of Florida Levin College of Law Research Paper No. 2010-15
Number of pages: 30 Posted: 08 Jun 2010 Last Revised: 19 Jul 2017
William H. Page and John E. Lopatka
University of Florida Levin College of Law and The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law
Downloads 215 (195,665)

Abstract:

Loading...

5.

Antitrust and Sports Equipment Standards: Winners and Whiners

Antitrust Bulliten, Vol. 54, No. 4, 2009
Number of pages: 67 Posted: 02 Jun 2009 Last Revised: 10 Jun 2010
John E. Lopatka
The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law
Downloads 169 (242,003)

Abstract:

Loading...

Antitrust, sports, boycott

6.

Assessing Microsoft from a Distance

Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 75, No. 3, 2009
Number of pages: 36 Posted: 12 Jun 2010
John E. Lopatka
The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law
Downloads 160 (253,495)

Abstract:

Loading...

7.

Internet Regulation and Consumer Welfare: Innovation, Speculation, and Cable Bundling

Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 52, p. 891, 2001
Number of pages: 38 Posted: 04 Jun 2009
John E. Lopatka and William H. Page
The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law and University of Florida Levin College of Law
Downloads 129 (300,346)

Abstract:

Loading...

antitrust, cable, internet, bundling

8.

Indirect Purchaser Suits and the Consumer Interest

Antitrust Bulletin, Vol. 48, p. 531, 2003
Number of pages: 41 Posted: 29 May 2009
John E. Lopatka and William H. Page
The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law and University of Florida Levin College of Law
Downloads 125 (307,436)
Citation 1

Abstract:

Loading...

antitrust, class actions, price fixing, private actions, damages

9.

Monopolization, Innovation, and Consumer Welfare

George Washington Law Review, Vol. 69, p. 367, 2001
Number of pages: 58 Posted: 03 Jun 2009
John E. Lopatka and William H. Page
The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law and University of Florida Levin College of Law
Downloads 123 (311,045)

Abstract:

Loading...

antitrust, monopolization, Microsoft, Intel, innovation

10.

'Obvious' Consumer Harm in Antitrust Policy: The Chicago School, the Post-Chicago School, and the Courts

POST-CHICAGO DEVELOPMENTS IN ANTITRUST LAW, Antonio Cucinotta, ed., Edward Elgar Pub. Co., 2002
Number of pages: 32 Posted: 28 May 2009 Last Revised: 22 Sep 2015
John E. Lopatka and William H. Page
The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law and University of Florida Levin College of Law
Downloads 122 (312,937)

Abstract:

Loading...

11.

Class Action Professional Objectors: What to Do About Them?

Florida State University Law Review, Forthcoming
Number of pages: 87 Posted: 29 Nov 2011
John E. Lopatka and Brooks Smith
The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law and Penn State Law
Downloads 100 (358,637)
Citation 1

Abstract:

Loading...

civil procedure, class action, settlement

12.

Antitrust on Internet Time: Microsoft and the Law and Economics of Exclusion

Supreme Court Economic Review, Vol. 7, p. 157, 1999
Number of pages: 75 Posted: 05 Jun 2009
John E. Lopatka and William H. Page
The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law and University of Florida Levin College of Law
Downloads 92 (378,022)
Citation 1

Abstract:

Loading...

antitrust, Microsoft, exclusionary practices, monopolization

13.

Peeling Apple: Antitrust Standing and Intermediary Defendants

Syracuse Law Review, Forthcoming
Number of pages: 93 Posted: 23 Oct 2020
John E. Lopatka
The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law
Downloads 82 (405,174)

Abstract:

Loading...

Antitrust, Private Standing, Illinois Brick, Tech, Multi-Sided Markets

14.

Res Ipsa Loquitur: Reducing Confusion or Creating Bias?

Kentucky Law Journal, Vol. 108, 2020, Penn State Law Research Paper No. 09-2020, FSU College of Law, Law, Business & Economics Paper No. 20-11
Number of pages: 62 Posted: 31 Mar 2020 Last Revised: 21 Aug 2020
Jeffrey H. Kahn and John E. Lopatka
Harry M. Walborsky Professor, Florida State University College of Law; Associate Dean, Business Program and The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law
Downloads 67 (452,736)

Abstract:

Loading...

15.

State Regulation in the Shadow of Antitrust: FTC v. Ticor Title Insurance Co.

Supreme Court Economic Review, Vol. 3, p. 189, 1993
Number of pages: 49 Posted: 11 Jun 2009
William H. Page and John E. Lopatka
University of Florida Levin College of Law and The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law
Downloads 65 (459,698)

Abstract:

Loading...

K21, K41, K43, L41, L51

16.

Parker v. Brown, the Eleventh Amendment, and Anticompetitive State Regulation

Number of pages: 43 Posted: 14 Oct 2018
William H. Page and John E. Lopatka
University of Florida Levin College of Law and The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law
Downloads 64 (463,272)

Abstract:

Loading...

17.

Who Suffered Antitrust Injury in the the Microsoft Case?

Who Suffered Antitrust Injury in the Microsoft Case?, 69 George Washington L. Rev. 829 (2001), George Washington Law Review, Vol. 69, 2001
Number of pages: 31 Posted: 30 May 2009
John E. Lopatka and William H. Page
The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law and University of Florida Levin College of Law
Downloads 62 (470,719)

Abstract:

Loading...

antitrust, Microsoft, monopolization, antitrust injury, damages

18.

Antitrust Injury, Merger Policy, and the Competitor Plaintiff

Antitrust Injury, the Competitor Plaintiff, and Merger Policy, 82 Iowa L. Rev. 127 (1996)
Number of pages: 24 Posted: 30 May 2009
William H. Page and John E. Lopatka
University of Florida Levin College of Law and The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law
Downloads 61 (474,507)

Abstract:

Loading...

antitrust, antitrust injury, mergers, private right of action

19.

State Action and the Meaning of Agreement Under the Sherman Act: An Approach to Hybrid Restraints

Yale Journal on Regulation, Vol. 20, p. 269, 2003
Number of pages: 56 Posted: 11 Jun 2009
John E. Lopatka and William H. Page
The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law and University of Florida Levin College of Law
Downloads 60 (478,328)

Abstract:

Loading...

antitrust, hybrid restraints, tacit collusion, Sherman Act

20.

Posner's Program for the Antitrust Division: A Twenty-Five Year Perspective

Southern Methodist University Law Review, Vol. 48, 1995
Number of pages: 35 Posted: 30 May 2009 Last Revised: 22 Sep 2015
John E. Lopatka and William H. Page
The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law and University of Florida Levin College of Law
Downloads 51 (514,579)

Abstract:

Loading...

antitrust, cartels, price-fixing, tacit collusion, exclusionary practices, public enforcement

21.

Devising a Microsoft Remedy that Serves Consumers

George Mason Law Review, Vol. 9, No. 3, p.691, 2001
Number of pages: 36 Posted: 04 Jun 2009
John E. Lopatka and William H. Page
The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law and University of Florida Levin College of Law
Downloads 39 (571,613)
Citation 2

Abstract:

Loading...

antitrust, monopolization, structural remedies, divestiture, conduct remedies

22.

The Dubious Search for 'Integration' in the Microsoft Trial

Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 31, p. 1251, 1999
Number of pages: 24 Posted: 04 Jun 2009
William H. Page and John E. Lopatka
University of Florida Levin College of Law and The Pennsylvania State University (University Park) – Penn State Law
Downloads 30 (622,805)

Abstract:

Loading...

antitrust, monopolization, integration, Microsoft