Katharine Kemp

University of New South Wales (UNSW) - Faculty of Law

Research Fellow

Kensington, New South Wales 2052

Australia

SCHOLARLY PAPERS

9

DOWNLOADS
Rank 42,990

SSRN RANKINGS

Top 42,990

in Total Papers Downloads

802

CITATIONS

0

Scholarly Papers (9)

1.

Resolution Powers Over E-Money Providers

UNSW Law Research Paper No. 49
Number of pages: 24 Posted: 19 Jul 2017
Katharine Kemp and Ross P. Buckley
University of New South Wales (UNSW) - Faculty of Law and University of New South Wales (UNSW) - Faculty of Law
Downloads 0 (273,561)

Abstract:

Loading...

e-money, resolution powers, bank and non-bank issuers, telecommunications companies, collapse large providers, banks, financial distress, winding up, e-money regulation, emoney, telco, developing countries

2.

'The Big Chill'? A Comparative Analysis of Effects-Based Tests for Misuse of Market Power

University of New South Wales Law Journal, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2017
Number of pages: 44 Posted: 31 May 2017
Katharine Kemp
University of New South Wales (UNSW) - Faculty of Law
Downloads 0 (194,402)

Abstract:

Loading...

misuse of market power, monopolisation, antitrust, competition law, unilateral conduct, effects test, effects-based test, exclusion, monopolization

3.

A Unifying Standard for Monopolization: 'Objective Anticompetitive Purpose'

Houston Journal of International Law, Forthcoming
Number of pages: 83 Posted: 26 Mar 2017
Katharine Kemp
University of New South Wales (UNSW) - Faculty of Law
Downloads 0 (277,772)

Abstract:

Loading...

Antitrust, Monopolization, Abuse of dominance, Misuse of market power, Profit sacrifice tests, Profit-focused test, Effects-based tests, Purpose

4.

'Taking Advantage' of Substantial Market Power, and Other Profit-Focused Tests for Unilateral Anticompetitive Conduct

Monash University Law Review, Vol 41, 655, 2016
Number of pages: 41 Posted: 03 Apr 2016
Katharine Kemp
University of New South Wales (UNSW) - Faculty of Law
Downloads 0 (192,040)

Abstract:

Loading...

Antitrust, Monopolization, Single Firm Conduct, Unilateral Conduct, Misuse of Market Power, Abuse of Dominance, Taking Advantage, No Economic Sense, Profit Sacrifice

5.

A Third Way: Objective Anticompetitive Purpose

UNSW Law Research Paper No. 2016-22
Number of pages: 31 Posted: 24 Feb 2016 Last Revised: 24 Mar 2016
Katharine Kemp
University of New South Wales (UNSW) - Faculty of Law
Downloads 0 (196,864)

Abstract:

Loading...

Antitrust, competition law, misuse of market power, monopolization, monopolies, abuse of dominance, Australia

6.

The Significance of Consideration Paid for Post-Employment Restraints in England and Germany

Stellenbosch Law Review, Vol 16, 257, 2005, UNSW Law Research Paper No. 2016-21
Number of pages: 16 Posted: 13 Feb 2016 Last Revised: 24 Mar 2016
Katharine Kemp
University of New South Wales (UNSW) - Faculty of Law
Downloads 0 (479,401)

Abstract:

Loading...

Post-employment restraints, consideration

7.

The South African Example: A Legislated Effects-Based Test and Efficiency Defence for Misuse of Market Power

UNSW Law Research Paper No. 2016-17
Number of pages: 12 Posted: 13 Feb 2016 Last Revised: 24 Mar 2016
Katharine Kemp
University of New South Wales (UNSW) - Faculty of Law
Downloads 0 (300,630)

Abstract:

Loading...

Unilateral anticompetitive conduct, monopolization, effects test, efficiency defence, competition law, South Africa

8.

The Case Against 'French J's Arsonist'

Australian Business Law Review, Vol 43, 228, 2015
Number of pages: 18 Posted: 04 Feb 2016
Katharine Kemp
University of New South Wales (UNSW) - Faculty of Law
Downloads 0 (329,950)

Abstract:

Loading...

Competition Law, Antitrust, Misuse of Market Power, Monopolization, Plain Exclusion

9.

Uncovering the Roots of Australia's Misuse of Market Power Provision: Is It Time to Reconsider?

Australian Business Law Review, Vol 42, 329, 2014
Number of pages: 22 Posted: 04 Feb 2016
Katharine Kemp
University of New South Wales (UNSW) - Faculty of Law
Downloads 0 (177,700)

Abstract:

Loading...

Competition Law, Antitrust, Misuse of Market Power, Monopolization, History, Unilateral Conduct