SSRN logo
Public User
Advanced Search

Mark A. Lemley

Stanford Law School

William H. Neukom Professor of Law

559 Nathan Abbott Way

Stanford, CA 94305-8610

United States

  • Stanford Law School

SCHOLARLY PAPERS

161

DOWNLOADS
Rank 16

SSRN RANKINGS

Top 16

in Total Papers Downloads

196,755

CITATIONS
Rank 493

SSRN RANKINGS

Top 493

in Total Papers Citations

967

Scholarly Papers (161)

Actions:
Email selected abstracts
1.

Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding

Downloads 13,799 ( 175)
Citation 43

Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding

Texas Law Review, Vol. 83, p. 1031, 2005
Number of pages: 58 Posted: 26 Aug 2004
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 13,799 (171)
Citation 43

Abstract:

Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding

Texas Law Review, Vol. 83, p. 1031, 2005
Posted: 01 May 2007
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School

Abstract:

2.

Valuable Patents

Downloads 5,709 ( 884)
Citation 22

Valuable Patents

Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 92, p. 435, 2004, George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 03-31, UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 133
Number of pages: 60 Posted: 30 Jul 2003
John R. Allison, Mark A. Lemley, Kimberly A. Moore and R. Derek Trunkey
University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Stanford Law School, affiliation not provided to SSRN and CBO
Downloads 5,709 (871)
Citation 22

Abstract:

patents, patent valuation, patent litigation, intellectual property

Valuable Patents

Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 92, p. 435, 2004, George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 03-31
Posted: 02 May 2007
John R. Allison, Mark A. Lemley, Kimberly A. Moore and R. Derek Trunkey
University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Stanford Law School, affiliation not provided to SSRN and CBO

Abstract:

patents, patent valuation, patent litigation, intellectual property

3.

Software Patents and the Return of Functional Claiming

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2117302
Number of pages: 60 Posted: 26 Jul 2012 Last Revised: 25 May 2014
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 4,556 (1,067)

Abstract:

4.

Intellectual Property Rights and Standard-Setting Organizations

California Law Review (online), Vol. 90, 2002, UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 84
Number of pages: 93 Posted: 31 Aug 2003 Last Revised: 14 May 2014
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 4,343 (1,251)
Citation 44

Abstract:

patents, standards, networks, antitrust, intellectual property, innovation

5.

Ex Ante Versus Ex Post Justifications for Intellectual Property

Downloads 4,290 ( 1,448)
Citation 26

Ex Ante Versus Ex Post Justifications for Intellectual Property

University Chicago Law Review, Vol. 71, p. 129, 2004, UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 144
Number of pages: 67 Posted: 16 Feb 2004 Last Revised: 06 Feb 2011
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 4,290 (1,424)
Citation 26

Abstract:

Ex Ante Versus Ex Post Justifications for Intellectual Property

University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 71, p. 129, 2004
Posted: 02 May 2007
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School

Abstract:

6.

The Myth of the Sole Inventor

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1856610
Number of pages: 108 Posted: 02 Jun 2011 Last Revised: 30 Sep 2012
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 4,229 (1,273)
Citation 2

Abstract:

7.

Where to File Your Patent Case

Aipla Quarterly Journal, Vol. 38, No. 4, p. 1, Fall 2010, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1597919
Number of pages: 37 Posted: 03 May 2010 Last Revised: 07 Dec 2014
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 4,174 (1,339)

Abstract:

8.

The End of End-to-End: Preserving the Architecture of the Internet in the Broadband Era

Downloads 3,953 ( 1,655)
Citation 20

The End of End-to-End: Preserving the Architecture of the Internet in the Broadband Era

UC Berkeley Law & Econ Research Paper No. 2000-19 , UCLA Law Review, Vol. 48, p. 925, 2001, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 207, UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 37
Number of pages: 63 Posted: 07 Nov 2000 Last Revised: 22 Dec 2013
Mark A. Lemley and Lawrence Lessig
Stanford Law School and Harvard Law School
Downloads 3,953 (1,628)
Citation 20

Abstract:

The End of End-to-End: Preserving the Architecture of the Internet in the Broadband Era

UCLA Law Review, Vol. 48, P. 925, 2001
Posted: 14 Feb 2001
Mark A. Lemley and Lawrence Lessig
Stanford Law School and Harvard Law School

Abstract:

9.

Legal Implications of Network Economic Effects

86 Cal. L. Rev. 479, 1998
Number of pages: 200 Posted: 26 Sep 1997
Mark A. Lemley and David McGowan
Stanford Law School and University of San Diego School of Law
Downloads 3,707 (1,816)
Citation 23

Abstract:

10.

IP in a World Without Scarcity

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2413974
Number of pages: 61 Posted: 25 Mar 2014 Last Revised: 20 Jun 2014
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 3,136 (1,729)

Abstract:

11.

Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking

Texas Law Review, Vol. 85, 2007, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 324
Number of pages: 59 Posted: 10 Aug 2006
Mark A. Lemley and Carl Shapiro
Stanford Law School and University of California, Berkeley - Haas School of Business
Downloads 3,009 (2,177)
Citation 43

Abstract:

12.

Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents

Downloads 2,922 ( 2,886)
Citation 29

Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents

American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) Quarterly Journal, Vol. 26, p. 185, 1998
Number of pages: 84 Posted: 28 Aug 1998 Last Revised: 01 Jun 2014
John R. Allison and Mark A. Lemley
University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Stanford Law School
Downloads 2,922 (2,823)
Citation 29

Abstract:

Empirical Evidence on the Validity of Litigated Patents

American Intellectual Property Law Association Quarterly Journal, Vol. 26, p. 185, 1998
Posted: 10 Sep 2001
John R. Allison and Mark A. Lemley
University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Stanford Law School

Abstract:

13.

Is the Sky Falling on the Content Industries?

Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law, Vol. 9, 2011, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1656485
Number of pages: 11 Posted: 11 Aug 2010 Last Revised: 13 May 2014
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 2,887 (2,647)

Abstract:

14.

Divided Infringement Claims

American Intellectual Property Law Association Quarterly Journal, Vol. 33, 255, 2005, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 100
Number of pages: 30 Posted: 20 Dec 2004
Mark A. Lemley, David W. O'Brien, Ryan M. Kent, Ashok Ramani and Robert Van Nest
Stanford Law School, Zagorin O'Brien Graham LLP, Keker & Van Nest LLP, Keker & Van Nest LLP and Keker & Van Nest LLP
Downloads 2,791 (2,977)
Citation 1

Abstract:

15.

Patent Scope and Innovation in the Software Industry

Downloads 2,758 ( 3,185)
Citation 27

Patent Scope and Innovation in the Software Industry

California Law Review, Vol. 89, No. 1, 2001
Number of pages: 58 Posted: 24 Feb 2000 Last Revised: 13 Jun 2012
Mark A. Lemley and Julie E. Cohen
Stanford Law School and Georgetown University Law Center
Downloads 2,015 (5,332)
Citation 27

Abstract:

Patent Scope and Innovation in the Software Industry

California Law Review, Vol. 89, p. 1, 2001
Number of pages: 58 Posted: 11 Sep 2001
Mark A. Lemley and Julie E. Cohen
Stanford Law School and Georgetown University Law Center
Downloads 743 (25,993)
Citation 27

Abstract:

16.

A New Balance between IP and Antitrust

Southwestern Journal of Law and Trade in the Americas, Vol. 13, p. 237, 2007, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 340
Number of pages: 21 Posted: 12 Apr 2007 Last Revised: 06 Feb 2011
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 2,658 (2,833)
Citation 1

Abstract:

17.

Policy Levers in Patent Law

Virginia Law Review, Vol. 89, p. 1575, 2003, Minnesota Public Law Research Paper No. 03-11, UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 135
Number of pages: 122 Posted: 07 Aug 2003 Last Revised: 03 Oct 2015
Mark A. Lemley and Dan L. Burk
Stanford Law School and University of California, Irvine School of Law
Downloads 2,599 (2,857)
Citation 15

Abstract:

patents, intellectual property, innovation, rules, standards, biotechnology, software, pharmaceuticals, cumulative innnovation, prospect theory

18.

Reducing Digital Copyright Infringement Without Restricting Innovation

Stanford Law Review, Vol. 56, p. 1345, 2004, UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 525662, U of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 63, U of Texas Law and Econ Research Paper No. 025
Number of pages: 88 Posted: 08 Apr 2004 Last Revised: 10 Jun 2012
Mark A. Lemley and R. Anthony Reese
Stanford Law School and University of California, Irvine School of Law
Downloads 2,541 (3,142)
Citation 11

Abstract:

19.

Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office

Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 95, No. 4, 2001
Number of pages: 35 Posted: 22 Mar 2001
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 2,187 (3,691)
Citation 88

Abstract:

20.

Don't Break the Internet

Stanford Law Review Online, Vol. 64, p. 34, December 2011, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1978989
Number of pages: 5 Posted: 04 Jan 2012 Last Revised: 20 Aug 2014
Mark A. Lemley, David S. Levine and David G. Post
Stanford Law School, Elon University School of Law and affiliation not provided to SSRN
Downloads 2,179 (4,275)
Citation 1

Abstract:

21.

Dealing with Overlapping Copyrights on the Internet

Downloads 2,068 ( 5,218)
Citation 14

Dealing with Overlapping Copyrights on the Internet

University of Daytona Law Review, Vol. 22, p. 547, 1997
Number of pages: 49 Posted: 10 Dec 1996 Last Revised: 12 May 2014
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 2,068 (5,114)
Citation 14

Abstract:

Dealing With Overlapping Copyrights on the Internet

University of Dayton Law Review, Vol. 22, P. 547, 1997
Posted: 08 Sep 2001
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School

Abstract:

22.

Rules for Growth: Promoting Innovation and Growth Through Legal Reform

Yale Law & Economics Research Paper No. 426, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 410, UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 1757982
Number of pages: 513 Posted: 08 Feb 2011 Last Revised: 20 Feb 2014
Robert E. Litan, Yochai Benkler, Henry N. Butler, John Henry Clippinger, Bob Cook-Deegan, Robert D. Cooter, Aaron S. Edlin, Nicole Stelle Garnett, Ronald J. Gilson, Oliver R. Goodenough, Gillian K. Hadfield, Mark A. Lemley, Frank Partnoy, George L. Priest, Larry E. Ribstein, Charles F. Sabel, Peter H. Schuck, Hal S. Scott, Robert E. Scott, Alex Stein, Victoria Stodden, John E. Tyler III, Alan D. Viard and Benjamin Wittes
Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) - Council on Foreign Relations- Washington D.C., Harvard University, George Mason University - Antonin Scalia Law School, Faculty, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Human Dynamics Group, Arizona State University (ASU), University of California, Berkeley - School of Law, University of California at Berkeley, Notre Dame Law School, Stanford Law School, Vermont Law School, USC Law School and Department of Economics, Stanford Law School, University of San Diego School of Law, Yale University - Law School, University of Illinois College of Law (deceased), Columbia University - Law School, Yale University - Law School, Harvard Law School, Columbia University - Law School, Brooklyn Law School, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign - Graduate School of Library and Information Science, Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, American Enterprise Institute and affiliation not provided to SSRN
Downloads 2,040 (3,875)
Citation 3

Abstract:

entrepreneurship, policy, growth, rules, innovation, immigration, intellectual property, ip, university, business, federal, national, patent

23.

Anticompetitive Settlement of Intellectual Property Disputes

Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 87, p. 1719, 2003, UC Berkeley, Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 113
Number of pages: 55 Posted: 24 Feb 2003
Herbert J. Hovenkamp, Mark D. Janis and Mark A. Lemley
University of Pennsylvania, Indiana University Maurer School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 1,993 (4,955)
Citation 15

Abstract:

antitrust, patent, settlement, intellectual property, Hatch-Waxman, exit payments

24.

Ending Abuse of Patent Continuations

Downloads 1,926 ( 5,867)
Citation 14

Ending Abuse of Patent Continuations

Boston University Law Review, Vol. 84, p. 63, 2004, UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 140, George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 03-52
Number of pages: 61 Posted: 28 Oct 2003 Last Revised: 06 Feb 2011
Mark A. Lemley and Kimberly A. Moore
Stanford Law School and affiliation not provided to SSRN
Downloads 1,926 (5,735)
Citation 14

Abstract:

patent law, empirical studies, intellectual property

Ending Abuse of Patent Continuations

Boston University Law Review, Vol. 84, p. 63, 2004
Posted: 02 May 2007
Mark A. Lemley and Kimberly A. Moore
Stanford Law School and affiliation not provided to SSRN

Abstract:

patent law, empirical studies, intellectual property

25.

What to do About Bad Patents

Regulation, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 10-13, Winter 2005-2006
Number of pages: 3 Posted: 13 Dec 2005
Mark A. Lemley, Douglas Lichtman and Bhaven N. Sampat
Stanford Law School, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law and Columbia University - Mailman School of Public Health
Downloads 1,893 (5,704)
Citation 10

Abstract:

patent law, patent reform, patent, post-grant, gold-plate

26.

Patent Quality and Settlement among Repeat Patent Litigants

Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 398
Number of pages: 31 Posted: 20 Sep 2010 Last Revised: 30 Sep 2012
John R. Allison, Joshua H. Walker and Mark A. Lemley
University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP and Stanford Law School
Downloads 1,859 (5,417)
Citation 5

Abstract:

patent, settlement, empirical, trolls, NPEs, litigation studies

27.

Terms of Use

Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 91, 2006
Number of pages: 25 Posted: 19 Jul 2006
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 1,716 (5,887)
Citation 2

Abstract:

28.

Antitrust and the Internet Standardization Problem

Downloads 1,654 ( 7,746)
Citation 13

Antitrust and the Internet Standardization Problem

Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 28, p. 1041, 1996
Number of pages: 63 Posted: 10 Dec 1996
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 1,654 (7,588)
Citation 13

Abstract:

Antitrust and the Internet Standardization Problem

Connecticut Law Review, Vol. 28, p. 1041, 1996
Posted: 08 Sep 2001
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School

Abstract:

29.

Is Patent Law Technology-Specific?

Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 17, p. 1155, 2002, Minnesota Public Law Research Paper No. 02-14, UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 106
Number of pages: 52 Posted: 14 Nov 2002 Last Revised: 03 Oct 2015
Dan L. Burk and Mark A. Lemley
University of California, Irvine School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 1,594 (7,405)
Citation 13

Abstract:

patents, biotechnology, software, PHOSITA, patent scope, Federal Circuit

30.

Rationalizing Internet Safe Harbors

Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law, Vol. 6, p. 101, 2007, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 979836, TPRC 2007
Number of pages: 24 Posted: 13 Apr 2007 Last Revised: 23 Dec 2013
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 1,576 (8,300)
Citation 4

Abstract:

31.

The Modern Lanham Act and the Death of Common Sense

Downloads 1,562 ( 8,438)
Citation 22

The Modern Lanham Act and the Death of Common Sense

Yale Law Journal, Vol. 108, p. 1687, 1999
Number of pages: 24 Posted: 30 Jan 1999 Last Revised: 06 Feb 2011
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 1,562 (8,279)
Citation 22

Abstract:

The Modern Lanham Act and the Death of Common Sense

Yale Law Journal, Vol. 108, P. 1687, 1999
Posted: 01 Feb 1999
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School

Abstract:

32.

How to Make a Patent Market

Hofstra Law Review, Vol. 36, p. 257, 2008, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 347
Number of pages: 3 Posted: 11 Sep 2007 Last Revised: 06 Feb 2011
Mark A. Lemley and Nathan Myhrvold
Stanford Law School and Intellectual Ventures
Downloads 1,499 (8,189)
Citation 3

Abstract:

33.

A Simple Approach to Setting Reasonable Royalties for Standard-Essential Patents

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2243026
Number of pages: 32 Posted: 02 Apr 2013 Last Revised: 29 Dec 2013
Mark A. Lemley and Carl Shapiro
Stanford Law School and University of California, Berkeley - Haas School of Business
Downloads 1,486 (5,862)

Abstract:

34.

Are Universities Patent Trolls?

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 18, p. 611, 2008, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 980776
Number of pages: 20 Posted: 24 Apr 2007 Last Revised: 20 Dec 2013
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 1,423 (8,285)
Citation 11

Abstract:

35.

Do Patent Licensing Demands Mean Innovation?

Iowa Law Review, Vol. 101, 2015, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 473, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2565292, UC Hastings Research Paper No. 135
Number of pages: 53 Posted: 16 Feb 2015 Last Revised: 13 Nov 2015
Robin Feldman and Mark A. Lemley
University of California Hastings College of the Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 1,401 (5,605)

Abstract:

patent, patents, troll, trolls, trolling, innovation, empirical, intellectual property

36.

Who's Patenting What? An Empirical Exploration of Patent Prosecution

Vanderbilt Law Review, Vol. 53, p. 2099, 2000, UC Berkeley, Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 19, University of Texas Public Law & Legal Theory, Research Paper No. 010
Number of pages: 81 Posted: 13 Jun 2000
John R. Allison and Mark A. Lemley
University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Stanford Law School
Downloads 1,355 (10,049)
Citation 18

Abstract:

37.

Do Applicant Patent Citations Matter?

7th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 401, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1656568
Number of pages: 11 Posted: 10 Aug 2010 Last Revised: 07 Mar 2015
Christopher Anthony Cotropia, Mark A. Lemley and Bhaven N. Sampat
University of Richmond School of Law, Stanford Law School and Columbia University - Mailman School of Public Health
Downloads 1,319 (9,984)
Citation 3

Abstract:

Patent, Intellectual Property, Examiner, Inequitable Conduct, Presumption of Validity, Empirical, Prior Art, Patent Prosecution

38.

Probabilistic Patents

Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 19, p. 75, 2005, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 288
Number of pages: 42 Posted: 23 Jul 2004
Mark A. Lemley and Carl Shapiro
Stanford Law School and University of California, Berkeley - Haas School of Business
Downloads 1,317 (8,997)
Citation 61

Abstract:

39.

Things You Should Care About in the New Patent Statute

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1929044
Number of pages: 10 Posted: 19 Sep 2011 Last Revised: 03 Jan 2015
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 1,310 (10,457)

Abstract:

40.

Missing the Forest for the Trolls

Columbia Law Review, Forthcoming, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 443
Number of pages: 74 Posted: 25 May 2013 Last Revised: 28 May 2015
Mark A. Lemley and A. Douglas Melamed
Stanford Law School and Stanford Law School
Downloads 1,290 (8,285)
Citation 1

Abstract:

patents, trolls, intellectual property, law, economics, antitrust

41.

Distinguishing Lost Profits from Reasonable Royalties

William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 51, 2009, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1133173
Number of pages: 20 Posted: 15 May 2008 Last Revised: 04 Nov 2009
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 1,244 (10,860)

Abstract:

42.

Faith-Based Intellectual Property

62 UCLA L. REV. 1328 (2015), Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2587297
Number of pages: 19 Posted: 01 Apr 2015 Last Revised: 30 Jun 2015
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 1,233 (6,757)

Abstract:

43.

Extreme Value or Trolls on Top? The Characteristics of the Most Litigated Patents

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 158, No. 1, December 2009, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1407796
Number of pages: 37 Posted: 21 May 2009 Last Revised: 30 Sep 2012
John R. Allison, Mark A. Lemley and Joshua H. Walker
University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Stanford Law School and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Downloads 1,195 (11,269)
Citation 4

Abstract:

44.

Life after Bilski

Stanford Law Review, Vol. 63, pp. 1315-1347, 2011, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1725009, San Diego Legal Studies Paper No. 11-046, U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 11-02, U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 11-05, Villanova Law/Public Policy Research Paper No. 2012-2003
Number of pages: 68 Posted: 17 Dec 2010 Last Revised: 29 Feb 2012
Mark A. Lemley, Michael Risch, Ted M. Sichelman and R. Polk Wagner
Stanford Law School, Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law, University of San Diego School of Law and University of Pennsylvania Law School
Downloads 1,181 (11,067)

Abstract:

patents, law, Bilski, invention, MOT, patentable subject matter, 101, Diehr, business methods, software, Federal Circuit

45.

Grounding Trademark Law Through Trademark Use

Iowa Law Review, Vol. 92, 2007, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 961470
Number of pages: 34 Posted: 01 Mar 2007 Last Revised: 04 Mar 2008
Mark A. Lemley and Stacey L. Dogan
Stanford Law School and Boston University - School of Law
Downloads 1,181 (9,813)
Citation 2

Abstract:

46.

Biotechnology's Uncertainty Principle

Case Western Reserve Law Review, Vol. 54, p. 691, 2004, Minnesota Public Law Research Paper No. 03-4, UC Berkeley Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 125
Number of pages: 52 Posted: 04 Jun 2003 Last Revised: 03 Oct 2015
Dan L. Burk and Mark A. Lemley
University of California, Irvine School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 1,158 (12,918)

Abstract:

patents, biotechnology, law and economics, obviousness, PHOSITA

47.

Is Pepsi Really a Substitute for Coke? Market Definition in Antitrust and IP

Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 100, p. 2055, 2012, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 424, Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 12-75
Number of pages: 63 Posted: 11 Apr 2012 Last Revised: 02 Jan 2015
Mark A. Lemley and Mark P. McKenna
Stanford Law School and Notre Dame Law School
Downloads 1,141 (10,841)

Abstract:

48.

Ignoring Patents

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 999961, Michigan State Law Review, Vol. 2008, No. 19, 2008
Number of pages: 16 Posted: 12 Jul 2007 Last Revised: 23 Mar 2013
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 1,135 (11,846)

Abstract:

49.

Understanding the Realities of Modern Patent Litigation

92 Texas Law Review 1769 (2014), Chicago-Kent College of Law Research Paper No. 2014-12, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2442451
Number of pages: 33 Posted: 28 May 2014 Last Revised: 07 Oct 2014
John R. Allison, Mark A. Lemley and David L. Schwartz
University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Stanford Law School and Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law
Downloads 1,082 (5,881)

Abstract:

50.

Earning Exclusivity: Generic Drug Incentives and the Hatch-Waxman Act

Antitrust Law Journal, Vol. 77, p. 947, 2011, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 405, Columbia Law and Economics Working Paper No. 391
Number of pages: 44 Posted: 10 Jan 2011 Last Revised: 01 Jun 2017
C. Scott Hemphill and Mark A. Lemley
New York University School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 1,078 (12,246)
Citation 2

Abstract:

Patent, Hatch-Waxman, Antitrust, Pharmaceuticals, Regulation, Incentives

51.

Patenting Nanotechnology

Stanford Law Review, Vol. 58, November 2005
Number of pages: 36 Posted: 11 Jun 2005
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 1,068 (14,548)
Citation 5

Abstract:

52.

Beyond Preemption: The Federal Law and Policy of Intellectual Property Licensing

Downloads 1,037 ( 16,182)
Citation 5

Beyond Preemption: The Federal Law and Policy of Intellectual Property Licensing

California Law Review, Vol. 87, p. 111, 1999
Number of pages: 57 Posted: 17 Jun 1998
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 1,037 (15,880)
Citation 5

Abstract:

Beyond Preemption: The Federal Law and Policy of Intellectual Property Licensing

California Law Review, Vol. 87, p. 111, 1999
Posted: 14 Jul 1998
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School

Abstract:

53.

Romantic Authorship and the Rhetoric of Property

Downloads 1,035 ( 16,221)
Citation 12

Romantic Authorship and the Rhetoric of Property

Texas Law Review, Vol. 75, p. 873, 1997
Number of pages: 50 Posted: 30 May 1997 Last Revised: 14 May 2014
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 1,035 (15,921)
Citation 12

Abstract:

Romantic Authorship and the Rhetoric of Property

Texas Law Review, Vol. 75, p. 873, 1997
Posted: 08 Sep 2001
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School

Abstract:

54.

Ten Things to do About Patent Holdup of Standards (and One Not To)

Boston College Law, Vol. 48, p. 149, 2007, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 923470
Number of pages: 11 Posted: 10 Aug 2006
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 1,013 (15,935)
Citation 13

Abstract:

55.

The Surprising Virtues of Treating Trade Secrets as IP Rights

Stanford Law Review, Vol. 61, p. 311, 2008, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 358
Number of pages: 57 Posted: 05 Jul 2008 Last Revised: 31 Jul 2012
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 986 (11,745)
Citation 6

Abstract:

56.

Spillovers

Columbia Law Review, Vol. 100, No. 2, 2006
Number of pages: 44 Posted: 25 Apr 2006
Mark A. Lemley and Brett M. Frischmann
Stanford Law School and Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Downloads 985 (14,939)
Citation 14

Abstract:

57.

Patent Holdup, the ITC, and the Public Interest

Cornell Law Review, 2012 , Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2022168
Number of pages: 44 Posted: 15 Mar 2012 Last Revised: 25 May 2014
Colleen V. Chien and Mark A. Lemley
Santa Clara University - School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 980 (14,379)

Abstract:

58.

Should Property or Liability Rules Govern Information?

Texas Law Review, Vol. 85, p. 783, 2007, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 341, U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-18
Number of pages: 61 Posted: 04 Apr 2007
Mark A. Lemley and Phil Weiser
Stanford Law School and University of Colorado Law School
Downloads 964 (15,081)
Citation 9

Abstract:

Law and Economics, Intellectual Property, Cyberlaw, Telecommunications Regulation

59.

An Antitrust Assessment of the Google Book Search Settlement

Number of pages: 13 Posted: 08 Jul 2009 Last Revised: 27 Oct 2012
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 958 (17,218)
Citation 1

Abstract:

60.

The (Unnoticed) Demise of the Doctrine of Equivalents

Stanford Law Review, Vol. 59, 2007
Number of pages: 31 Posted: 12 Jan 2007
John R. Allison and Mark A. Lemley
University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Stanford Law School
Downloads 914 (18,127)

Abstract:

61.

Trademarks and Consumer Search Costs on the Internet

Houston Law Review, Vol. 41, p. 777, 2004, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 294
Number of pages: 72 Posted: 02 Jul 2004
Stacey L. Dogan and Mark A. Lemley
Boston University - School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 909 (16,208)
Citation 4

Abstract:

62.

Designing Optimal Software Patents

Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 05-11; Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 108
Number of pages: 29 Posted: 22 Apr 2005
Dan L. Burk and Mark A. Lemley
University of California, Irvine School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 906 (18,233)
Citation 1

Abstract:

software, innovation policy, patents

63.

What the Right of Publicity Can Learn from Trademark Law

Stanford Law Review, Vol. 58, p. 1161, 2006
Number of pages: 60 Posted: 01 Dec 2005
Stacey L. Dogan and Mark A. Lemley
Boston University - School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 905 (17,112)

Abstract:

64.

Inherency

William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 47, No. 2, 2005
Number of pages: 41 Posted: 30 Nov 2005
Dan L. Burk and Mark A. Lemley
University of California, Irvine School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 887 (19,299)

Abstract:

65.

Place and Cyberspace

California Law Review, Vol. 91, p. 521, 2003
Number of pages: 38 Posted: 13 Nov 2002
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 881 (19,483)
Citation 17

Abstract:

cyberspace, metaphor, trespass to chattels, eBay v. Bidder's Edge

66.

A Structured Approach to Calculating Reasonable Royalties

Downloads 860 ( 21,426)

A Structured Approach to Calculating Reasonable Royalties

Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 14, p. 627, 2010, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1567019
Number of pages: 25 Posted: 09 Mar 2010 Last Revised: 20 Dec 2013
Daralyn J. Durie and Mark A. Lemley
Durie Tangri LLP and Stanford Law School
Downloads 606 (34,448)

Abstract:

A Structured Approach to Calculating Reasonable Royalties

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 485064
Number of pages: 25 Posted: 09 Oct 2009 Last Revised: 17 Feb 2011
Daralyn J. Durie and Mark A. Lemley
Durie Tangri LLP and Stanford Law School
Downloads 254 (98,363)

Abstract:

67.

Unilateral Refusals to License in the U.S.

Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 303
Number of pages: 45 Posted: 01 Jun 2005
Herbert J. Hovenkamp, Mark D. Janis and Mark A. Lemley
University of Pennsylvania, Indiana University Maurer School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 852 (18,412)
Citation 3

Abstract:

68.

Standardizing Government Standard-Setting Policy for Electronic Commerce

Downloads 840 ( 22,151)
Citation 2

Standardizing Government Standard-Setting Policy for Electronic Commerce

Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 14, p. 745, 1999
Number of pages: 16 Posted: 12 May 1999 Last Revised: 12 Oct 2015
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 840 (21,784)
Citation 2

Abstract:

Standardizing Government Standard-Setting Policy for Electronic Commerce

Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 14, p. 745, 1999
Posted: 08 Sep 2001
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School

Abstract:

69.

The Changing Meaning of Patent Claim Terms

Michigan Law Review, Vol. 104, p. 101, 2005, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 107
Number of pages: 30 Posted: 07 Mar 2005
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 832 (20,694)
Citation 2

Abstract:

70.

The Economics of Improvement in Intellectual Property Law

Texas Law Review, Vol. 75, p. 989, 1997, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 365
Number of pages: 105 Posted: 29 Sep 2008 Last Revised: 06 Feb 2011
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 815 (17,744)
Citation 46

Abstract:

71.

The Growing Complexity of the United States Patent System

Boston University Law Review, Vol. 82, p. 77, 2002
Number of pages: 85 Posted: 08 Sep 2001
John R. Allison and Mark A. Lemley
University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Stanford Law School
Downloads 815 (20,500)
Citation 11

Abstract:

72.

Examining Patent Examination

Stanford Technology Law Review, Vol. 2010, p. 2, 2010, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1485011
Number of pages: 20 Posted: 08 Oct 2009 Last Revised: 06 Feb 2011
Bhaven N. Sampat and Mark A. Lemley
Columbia University - Mailman School of Public Health and Stanford Law School
Downloads 800 (20,998)
Citation 8

Abstract:

73.

Parody as Brand

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2170498
Number of pages: 41 Posted: 03 Nov 2012 Last Revised: 20 Dec 2013
Stacey L. Dogan and Mark A. Lemley
Boston University - School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 785 (19,053)

Abstract:

74.

The Law and Economics of Internet Norms

Downloads 768 ( 25,263)

The Law and Economics of Internet Norms

Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 73, pp. 1257-1294, 1998
Number of pages: 45 Posted: 07 Jul 2000 Last Revised: 12 Oct 2015
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 768 (24,849)
Citation 10

Abstract:

The Law and Economics of Internet Norms

Posted: 02 Mar 1999
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School

Abstract:

75.

Copying in Patent Law

North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 87, p. 1421, 2009, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1270160
Number of pages: 59 Posted: 19 Sep 2008 Last Revised: 06 Feb 2011
Christopher Anthony Cotropia and Mark A. Lemley
University of Richmond School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 762 (21,755)
Citation 3

Abstract:

76.

Rethinking Patent Law's Presumption of Validity

Stanford Law Review, Vol. 60, p. 45, 2007, UCLA School of Law, Law-Econ Research Paper No. 07-12, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 963996, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 353
Number of pages: 30 Posted: 02 Aug 2007 Last Revised: 06 Feb 2011
Douglas Lichtman and Mark A. Lemley
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 756 (24,033)
Citation 13

Abstract:

patent law, patents, patent review, presumption, presumption of validity

77.

The Patent Crisis and How Courts Can Solve It

UC Irvine School of Law Research Working Paper No. 2009-8, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working No. 370, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1349950
Number of pages: 7 Posted: 26 Feb 2009 Last Revised: 14 May 2014
Dan L. Burk and Mark A. Lemley
University of California, Irvine School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 739 (23,438)
Citation 7

Abstract:

78.

Could Java Change Everything? The Competitive Propriety of a Proprietary Standard

Downloads 737 ( 26,719)
Citation 4

Could Java Change Everything? The Competitive Propriety of a Proprietary Standard

Antitrust Bulletin, Vol. 43, p. 715, 1998
Number of pages: 52 Posted: 04 Mar 1998
Mark A. Lemley and David McGowan
Stanford Law School and University of San Diego School of Law
Downloads 737 (26,293)
Citation 4

Abstract:

Could Java Change Everything? the Competitive Propriety of a Proprietary Standard

Antitrust Bulletin, Vol. 43, p. 715, 1998
Posted: 04 Mar 1998
Mark A. Lemley and David McGowan
Stanford Law School and University of San Diego School of Law

Abstract:

79.

Industry-Specific Antitrust Policy for Innovation

Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 397
Number of pages: 15 Posted: 01 Sep 2010
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 719 (23,850)
Citation 2

Abstract:

Intellectual Property, Patent, Innovation, Antitrust, Schumpeter

80.

Is the Patent Office a Rubber Stamp?

Emory Law Journal, Vol. 58, p. 181, 2008, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 999098, 2nd Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper
Number of pages: 28 Posted: 09 Jul 2007 Last Revised: 06 Feb 2011
Mark A. Lemley and Bhaven N. Sampat
Stanford Law School and Columbia University - Mailman School of Public Health
Downloads 708 (24,337)
Citation 9

Abstract:

patent, patents, USPTO, intellectual property

81.

Owning Mark(et)s

Michigan Law Review, Vol. 109, p. 137, November 2010
Number of pages: 54 Posted: 12 May 2010 Last Revised: 17 Sep 2010
Mark A. Lemley and Mark P. McKenna
Stanford Law School and Notre Dame Law School
Downloads 706 (23,850)
Citation 1

Abstract:

intellectual property, trademark, free riding, confusion, sponsorship, advertising, antitrust injury

82.

The Merchandising Right: Fragile Theory or Fait Accompli?

Emory Law Journal, Vol. 54, p. 461, 2005, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 105
Number of pages: 63 Posted: 17 Dec 2004
Stacey L. Dogan and Mark A. Lemley
Boston University - School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 671 (25,580)
Citation 2

Abstract:

83.

Inducing Patent Infringement

UC Davis Law Review, Vol. 39, p. 225, 2005, Stanford Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 110
Number of pages: 27 Posted: 28 Jul 2005
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 657 (29,991)
Citation 3

Abstract:

84.

Irrelevant Confusion

Stanford Law Review, Vol. 62, January 2010, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1407793
Number of pages: 42 Posted: 21 May 2009 Last Revised: 25 Jan 2010
Mark A. Lemley and Mark P. McKenna
Stanford Law School and Notre Dame Law School
Downloads 651 (26,319)

Abstract:

85.

Intellectual Property and Shrinkwrap Licenses

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2126845
Number of pages: 56 Posted: 09 Aug 2012
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 646 (21,254)
Citation 18

Abstract:

86.

Are the U.S. Patent Priority Rules Really Necessary?

Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 54, p. 1299, 2003, UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 124
Number of pages: 44 Posted: 15 May 2003
Mark A. Lemley and Colleen V. Chien
Stanford Law School and Santa Clara University - School of Law
Downloads 639 (30,440)
Citation 6

Abstract:

patent, interference, priority, harmonization, 102(g)

87.

Examiner Characteristics and Patent Office Outcomes

Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 369
Number of pages: 11 Posted: 19 Jan 2009 Last Revised: 20 Aug 2012
Mark A. Lemley and Bhaven N. Sampat
Stanford Law School and Columbia University - Mailman School of Public Health
Downloads 633 (29,556)
Citation 2

Abstract:

88.

How Federal Circuit Judges Vote in Patent Validity Cases

Florida State Univeristy Law Review, Vol. 29, p. 745, 2000
Number of pages: 24 Posted: 29 Nov 1999
John R. Allison and Mark A. Lemley
University of Texas - McCombs School of Business and Stanford Law School
Downloads 616 (33,423)
Citation 2

Abstract:

89.

Fence Posts or Sign Posts: Rethinking Patent Claim Construction

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, Vol. 157, p. 1743, 2009, UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2009-10, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1358460
Number of pages: 57 Posted: 13 Mar 2009 Last Revised: 03 Oct 2015
Dan L. Burk and Mark A. Lemley
University of California, Irvine School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 614 (31,624)
Citation 4

Abstract:

patents, intellectual property, claim construction, peripheral claiming, central claiming, Markman

90.

The Limits of Claim Differentiation

Berkeley Tech. Law Journal, Vol. 22, p. 1389, 2007, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1008885
Number of pages: 16 Posted: 23 Aug 2007 Last Revised: 05 Dec 2014
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 606 (33,643)
Citation 1

Abstract:

91.

Freedom of Speech and Injunctions in Intellectual Property Cases

Downloads 596 ( 35,749)
Citation 5

Freedom of Speech and Injunctions in Intellectual Property Cases

Duke Law Journal, Vol. 48, p. 147, 1998
Number of pages: 110 Posted: 10 May 1998 Last Revised: 06 Feb 2011
Mark A. Lemley and Eugene Volokh
Stanford Law School and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law
Downloads 596 (35,223)
Citation 5

Abstract:

Freedom of Speech and Injunctions in Intellectual Property Cases

Duke Law Journal, Vol. 48, p. 147, October 1998
Posted: 11 May 1998
Mark A. Lemley and Eugene Volokh
Stanford Law School and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law

Abstract:

92.

A Search-Costs Theory of Limiting Doctrines in Trademark Law

Trademark Reporter, Vol. 97, No. 6, November-December 2007, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 977320
Number of pages: 30 Posted: 30 Mar 2007 Last Revised: 23 Dec 2007
Stacey L. Dogan and Mark A. Lemley
Boston University - School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 573 (30,885)

Abstract:

93.

Quantum Patent Mechanics

Lewis & Clark Law Review, Vol. 9, p. 29, 2005 , Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 102
Number of pages: 28 Posted: 20 Dec 2004 Last Revised: 03 Oct 2015
Dan L. Burk and Mark A. Lemley
University of California, Irvine School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 547 (37,330)
Citation 1

Abstract:

94.

Intellectual Property Litigation Clearinghouse: Data Overview

2007 Kauffman Symposium on Entrepreneurship and Innovation Data, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1024032
Number of pages: 1 Posted: 28 Oct 2007
Mark A. Lemley and Joshua H. Walker
Stanford Law School and Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Downloads 543 (36,984)

Abstract:

95.

Foreseeability in Patent Law

Berkeley Tech. Law Journal, Vol. 16, p. 1045, 2001
Number of pages: 23 Posted: 25 Oct 2001
Matthew J. Conigliaro, Andrew C. Greenberg and Mark A. Lemley
Carlton Fields, Attorneys at Law, Carlton Fields, Attorneys at Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 538 (40,127)
Citation 3

Abstract:

96.

Why Do Juries Decide If Patents are Valid?

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2306152
Number of pages: 75 Posted: 07 Aug 2013
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 534 (26,110)

Abstract:

97.

The Audience in Intellectual Property Infringement

Michigan Law Review, Vol. 112, p. 1251 (2014), NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 13-31, NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 13-19, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 447, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2272235
Number of pages: 55 Posted: 31 May 2013 Last Revised: 15 Mar 2015
Jeanne C. Fromer and Mark A. Lemley
New York University School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 534 (32,985)

Abstract:

intellectual property, patent, copyright, trademark, design patent, audience, infringement, PHOSITA, substantial similarity

98.

Reply: Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking

Texas Law Review, Vol. 85, 2007, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 345
Number of pages: 12 Posted: 14 Aug 2007
Mark A. Lemley and Carl Shapiro
Stanford Law School and University of California, Berkeley - Haas School of Business
Downloads 533 (36,821)
Citation 37

Abstract:

99.

A Quick and Inexpensive System for Resolving Digital Copyright Disputes

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2005
Number of pages: 20 Posted: 11 Apr 2004
Mark A. Lemley and R. Anthony Reese
Stanford Law School and University of California, Irvine School of Law
Downloads 531 (39,659)

Abstract:

100.

A Realistic Approach to the Obviousness of Inventions

William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 50, p. 989, 2008, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1133169
Number of pages: 32 Posted: 15 May 2008 Last Revised: 06 Feb 2011
Daralyn J. Durie and Mark A. Lemley
Durie Tangri LLP and Stanford Law School
Downloads 501 (40,308)
Citation 2

Abstract:

101.

Our Bizarre System for Proving Copyright Infringement

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1661434
Number of pages: 32 Posted: 21 Aug 2010
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 494 (35,579)

Abstract:

102.

Should Patent Infringement Require Proof of Copying?

Michigan. Law Review, Vol. 105, p. 1525, 2007
Number of pages: 12 Posted: 05 Jan 2007 Last Revised: 25 May 2014
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 483 (40,401)
Citation 8

Abstract:

103.

ICANN and Antitrust

University of Illinois Law Review, Vol. 1, 2003, UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 73
Number of pages: 56 Posted: 28 Nov 2001
A. Michael Froomkin and Mark A. Lemley
University of Miami - School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 483 (44,105)
Citation 5

Abstract:

104.

The Regulatory Turn in IP

Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 36, No. 1, Forthcoming, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 435, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2172440
Number of pages: 7 Posted: 07 Nov 2012 Last Revised: 06 Apr 2013
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 468 (43,370)

Abstract:

intellectual property, regulation, copyright, patent

105.

Antitrust Law and Regulatory Gaming

Texas Law Review, Vol. 87, p. 685, 2009, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 367
Number of pages: 59 Posted: 20 Oct 2008 Last Revised: 06 Feb 2011
Stacey L. Dogan and Mark A. Lemley
Boston University - School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 452 (38,297)
Citation 2

Abstract:

106.

Point of Novelty

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1735045
Number of pages: 28 Posted: 05 Jan 2011 Last Revised: 08 Feb 2012
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 449 (45,469)

Abstract:

Patent, Novelty, Patentable Subject Matter, Exhaustion

107.

Rush to Judgment? Trial Length and Outcomes in Patent Cases

AIPLA Quarterly Journal, Vol. 41, No. 2, Spring 2013, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2217690
Number of pages: 36 Posted: 14 Feb 2013 Last Revised: 02 Oct 2013
Mark A. Lemley, Jamie Kendall and Clint Martin
Stanford Law School, Stanford Law School and Google Inc
Downloads 443 (44,445)

Abstract:

108.

Categorical Analysis in Antitrust Jurisprudence

Iowa Law Review, Vol. 93, p. 1207, 2008, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 348
Number of pages: 89 Posted: 02 Nov 2007 Last Revised: 06 Feb 2011
Mark A. Lemley and Christopher R. Leslie
Stanford Law School and University of California, Irvine School of Law
Downloads 431 (45,812)
Citation 3

Abstract:

109.

The Ongoing Confusion Over Ongoing Royalties

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1793361
Number of pages: 13 Posted: 28 Mar 2011 Last Revised: 03 Jan 2015
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 423 (51,505)

Abstract:

110.

Our Divided Patent System

University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 82, pp. 1073-1154 (2015), Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2510004, Chicago-Kent College of Law Research Paper No. 2014-28
Number of pages: 82 Posted: 14 Oct 2014 Last Revised: 09 Feb 2016
John R. Allison, Mark A. Lemley and David L. Schwartz
University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Stanford Law School and Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law
Downloads 421 (35,255)

Abstract:

111.

The Trademark Use Requirement in Dilution Cases

Santa Clara Comp. & High Tech. Law Journal, Vol. 24, p. 541, 2008, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1033165
Number of pages: 17 Posted: 02 Dec 2007 Last Revised: 06 Feb 2011
Stacey L. Dogan and Mark A. Lemley
Boston University - School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 419 (50,377)

Abstract:

112.

Contracting Around Liability Rules

Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 415
Number of pages: 24 Posted: 16 Aug 2011 Last Revised: 03 Jan 2015
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 392 (55,063)

Abstract:

113.

The Fractioning of Patent Law

Intellectual Property and the Common Law, Shyamkrishna Balganesh, ed., Cambridge University Press, 2012, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1895681
Number of pages: 10 Posted: 26 Jul 2011 Last Revised: 03 Jan 2015
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 367 (61,935)

Abstract:

114.

Ending Patent Law's Willfulness Game

Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 18, p. 1085, 2003, UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 142
Number of pages: 47 Posted: 17 Dec 2003
Mark A. Lemley and R. K. Tangri
Stanford Law School and Keker & Van Nest LLP
Downloads 364 (63,487)
Citation 10

Abstract:

patents, intellectual property, independent invention, willfulness, attorney-client privilege

115.

Ready for Patenting

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2613696
Number of pages: 29 Posted: 03 Jun 2015 Last Revised: 18 Aug 2015
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 321 (52,078)

Abstract:

116.

California Restrictive Employment Covenants after Edwards

California Labor & Employment Law Review, Vol 23, No. 3, 2009, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1295606
Number of pages: 10 Posted: 05 Nov 2008 Last Revised: 22 Dec 2013
Mark A. Lemley and James H. A. Pooley
Stanford Law School and Independent
Downloads 317 (73,123)
Citation 1

Abstract:

117.

Fixing the Patent Office

Downloads 295 ( 84,020)

Fixing the Patent Office

Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 422
Number of pages: 16 Posted: 16 Mar 2012 Last Revised: 02 Oct 2013
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 282 (87,932)

Abstract:

Fixing the Patent Office

NBER Working Paper No. w18081
Number of pages: 18 Posted: 19 May 2012
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 13 (499,647)

Abstract:

118.

The Dubious Autonomy of Virtual Worlds

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2021521
Number of pages: 9 Posted: 13 Mar 2012 Last Revised: 07 Aug 2012
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 286 (82,069)

Abstract:

119.

Scope

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2660951
Number of pages: 90 Posted: 17 Sep 2015 Last Revised: 08 Jun 2016
Mark A. Lemley and Mark P. McKenna
Stanford Law School and Notre Dame Law School
Downloads 285 (29,617)

Abstract:

120.

A Rational System of Design Patent Remedies

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2226508
Number of pages: 20 Posted: 01 Mar 2013 Last Revised: 21 Feb 2014
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 283 (56,540)

Abstract:

121.

Brief Amici Curiae of 20 Law and Business Professors in Support of Neither Party in Bilski v. Doll

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1485043
Number of pages: 44 Posted: 08 Oct 2009
Mark A. Lemley, Michael Risch, Ted M. Sichelman and R. Polk Wagner
Stanford Law School, Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law, University of San Diego School of Law and University of Pennsylvania Law School
Downloads 278 (83,378)

Abstract:

patentable subject matter, Bilski, patent eligibility, business method patents, software patents

122.

Can the Patent Office Be Fixed?

Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 396
Number of pages: 17 Posted: 30 Aug 2010 Last Revised: 12 Mar 2013
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 271 (88,055)

Abstract:

intellectual property, patent, PTO, patent reform

123.

Does Familiarity Breed Contempt Among Judges Deciding Patent Cases?

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2347712, UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 2347712
Number of pages: 38 Posted: 01 Nov 2013 Last Revised: 01 Aug 2014
Mark A. Lemley, Su Li and Jennifer M. Urban
Stanford Law School, University of California, Berkeley - Center for the Study of Law and Society and University of California, Berkeley - School of Law
Downloads 260 (86,326)

Abstract:

124.

A Cautious Defense of Intellectual Oligopoly with Fringe Competition

Review Law & Economics, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2009, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 374
Number of pages: 13 Posted: 21 May 2009 Last Revised: 06 Feb 2011
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 260 (90,549)
Citation 1

Abstract:

125.

Taking the Regulatory Nature of IP Seriously

Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 455
Number of pages: 13 Posted: 02 Feb 2014 Last Revised: 13 May 2014
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 243 (85,635)

Abstract:

126.

Courts and the Patent System

Regulation, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 18-23, Summer 2009, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1432452, UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2009-29
Number of pages: 7 Posted: 05 Aug 2009 Last Revised: 25 Aug 2010
Dan L. Burk and Mark A. Lemley
University of California, Irvine School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 243 (99,309)

Abstract:

PHOSITA, Person having ordinary skill in the art, Patent Act, PTO, Patent and Trademark Office, defensive patents, IP, intellectual property, property rule

127.

Who Chooses Open Source Software?

Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 382
Number of pages: 35 Posted: 29 Oct 2009 Last Revised: 30 Mar 2013
Mark A. Lemley and Ziv Shafir
Stanford Law School and Stanford Law School
Downloads 239 (96,469)

Abstract:

128.

IP and Other Regulations

Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 476, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2589278
Number of pages: 5 Posted: 04 Apr 2015 Last Revised: 21 Apr 2015
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 228 (76,449)

Abstract:

129.

An Empirical Study of the Twenty-Year Patent Term

AIPLA Quarterly Journal, Vol. 22, Numbers 3&4, p. 369, Summer/ Fall 1994, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2127292
Number of pages: 56 Posted: 10 Aug 2012
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 224 (78,357)
Citation 2

Abstract:

130.

Should a Licensing Market Require Licensing?

Law & Contemp. Probs., Vol. 70, p. 185, 2007, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 917161
Number of pages: 30 Posted: 14 Jul 2006 Last Revised: 06 Feb 2011
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 223 (107,742)

Abstract:

131.

Brief Amici Curiae of 118 Law, Economics, and Business Professors and the American Antitrust Institute in Support of Petitioners

Supreme Court amicus brief in FTC v. Watson, 2013
Number of pages: 62 Posted: 30 Jan 2013
Michael A. Carrier and Mark A. Lemley
Rutgers Law School and Stanford Law School
Downloads 214 (109,177)

Abstract:

patent, antitrust, drugs, pharmaceuticals, settlement, Hatch Waxman, reverse payments, exclusion payments, Androgel

132.

Does 'Public Use' Mean the Same Thing It Did Last Year?

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2394153
Number of pages: 23 Posted: 13 Feb 2014 Last Revised: 18 Sep 2014
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 210 (96,469)

Abstract:

133.

If You Can't Beat 'Em, Join 'Em? How Sitting by Designation Affects Judicial Behavior

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2449349
Number of pages: 34 Posted: 14 Jun 2014 Last Revised: 16 Feb 2016
Mark A. Lemley and Shawn P. Miller
Stanford Law School and Stanford Law School
Downloads 155 (116,055)

Abstract:

134.

Antitrust Arbitration and Merger Approval

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2578059
Number of pages: 62 Posted: 15 Mar 2015 Last Revised: 15 Dec 2015
Mark A. Lemley and Christopher R. Leslie
Stanford Law School and University of California, Irvine School of Law
Downloads 138 (108,210)

Abstract:

135.

Convergence in the Law of Software Copyright?

High Technology Law Journal, Vol. 10:1, 1995, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2127335
Number of pages: 34 Posted: 10 Aug 2012
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 133 (144,279)
Citation 3

Abstract:

136.

Antitrust Arbitration and Illinois Brick

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2532684
Number of pages: 18 Posted: 03 Dec 2014 Last Revised: 28 May 2015
Mark A. Lemley and Christopher R. Leslie
Stanford Law School and University of California, Irvine School of Law
Downloads 130 (130,414)

Abstract:

137.

Understanding the Economic Espionage Act of 1996

Texas Intellectual Prfoperty Law Journal, Vol. 5, No. 177, 1997
Number of pages: 45 Posted: 10 Jul 2013
James H. A. Pooley, Mark A. Lemley and Peter J. Toren
Independent, Stanford Law School and Weisbrod Matteis & Copley PLLC
Downloads 87 (199,189)

Abstract:

138.

The Economic Irrationality of the Patent Misuse Doctrine

California Law Review, Vol. 78, No. 1599, 1990
Number of pages: 34 Posted: 06 Aug 2012
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 52 (304,657)
Citation 1

Abstract:

139.

Encouraging Software Reuse

Stanford Law Review, Vol. 49, P. 255, February 1997.
Number of pages: 27 Posted: 20 Jan 1997 Last Revised: 14 May 2014
Mark A. Lemley and David W. O'Brien
Stanford Law School and Zagorin O'Brien Graham LLP
Downloads 43 (312,617)
Citation 4

Abstract:

140.

Antitrust Immunity: State Action and Federalism, Petitioning and the First Amendment

Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 17, No. 2, Spring 1994, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2123697
Number of pages: 56 Posted: 04 Aug 2012
David McGowan and Mark A. Lemley
University of San Diego School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 38 (304,657)
Citation 1

Abstract:

141.

Reconceiving Patents in the Age of Venture Capital

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2635229
Number of pages: 17 Posted: 24 Jul 2015
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 31 (227,786)
Citation 14

Abstract:

142.

Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age: 2017 - Chapters 1 and 2

Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age 2017: Vol. II Copyrights, Trademarks and State IP Protections; ISBN-13: 978-1945555077
Number of pages: 178 Posted: 22 Jul 2017
Peter S. Menell, Mark A. Lemley and Robert P. Merges
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law, Stanford Law School and University of California, Berkeley - School of Law
Downloads 0 (261,582)
Citation 1

Abstract:

Intellectual Property, Trade Secret, Patent, Copyright, Trademark, Misappropriation, Right of Publicity

143.

Recent Developments in Patent Law (Spring 2017)

Stanford Public Law Working Paper
Number of pages: 94 Posted: 27 Apr 2017
Mark A. Lemley, Madeleine Laupheimer and James Yoon
Stanford Law School, Stanford University, School of Law and Stanford University, School of Law, Students
Downloads 0 (127,406)

Abstract:

144.

Law, Virtual Reality, and Augmented Reality

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2933867, UCLA School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 17-13
Number of pages: 64 Posted: 17 Mar 2017 Last Revised: 14 Apr 2017
Mark A. Lemley and Eugene Volokh
Stanford Law School and University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law
Downloads 0 (13,646)

Abstract:

Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, Law & Technology, Criminal Law, Torts, Privacy, Right of Publicity

145.

Functionality Screens

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2888094, Cardozo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 509
Number of pages: 72 Posted: 27 Dec 2016 Last Revised: 04 May 2017
Christopher Buccafusco and Mark A. Lemley
Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law and Stanford Law School
Downloads 0 (129,836)

Abstract:

146.

Patent Purchases and Litigation Outcomes

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2879691
Number of pages: 21 Posted: 05 Dec 2016
Mark A. Lemley, Erik Oliver, Kent Richardson, James Yoon and Michael Costa
Stanford Law School, Richardson Oliver Law Group LLP, Richardson Oliver Law Group, Stanford University, School of Law, Students and Richardson Oliver Law Group
Downloads 0 (197,926)

Abstract:

147.

Inventor Sued for Infringing His Own Patent. You Won't Believe What Happened Next

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2878054
Number of pages: 32 Posted: 02 Dec 2016
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 0 (21,426)

Abstract:

148.

The Fruit of the Poisonous Tree in IP Law

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2867099
Number of pages: 32 Posted: 10 Nov 2016
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 0 (134,419)

Abstract:

149.

Brief of Amici Curiae 56 Professors of Law and Economics in Support of Petition for Writ of Certiorari in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, No. 16-341

Duke I&E Research Paper No. 2016-44, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 499
Number of pages: 24 Posted: 18 Oct 2016 Last Revised: 10 Nov 2016
Colleen V. Chien, Mark A. Lemley, Brian J. Love and Arti K. Rai
Santa Clara University - School of Law, Stanford Law School, Santa Clara University School of Law and Duke University School of Law
Downloads 0 (148,903)

Abstract:

Venue, Jurisdiction, Eastern District of Texas, Patent Assertion Entity, PAE

150.

Comments of Law and Business Scholars Submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission Regarding a Proposed Update to the Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property

University of Utah College of Law Research Paper No. 182, Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 357
Number of pages: 4 Posted: 27 Sep 2016 Last Revised: 20 Jan 2017
Jorge L. Contreras, Brad Biddle, Colleen V. Chien, Donald E Knebel, Mark A. Lemley, Daryl Lim, Brian J. Love, Peter S. Menell, Joseph Scott Miller, Timothy Simcoe, Liza Vertinsky and Elizabeth I. Winston
University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law, Arizona State University (ASU) - College of Law, Santa Clara University - School of Law, Indiana University Maurer School of Law, Stanford Law School, The John Marshall Law School, Santa Clara University School of Law, University of California, Berkeley - School of Law, University of Georgia Law School, Boston University - Questrom School of Business, Emory University School of Law and Catholic University of America (CUA) - Columbus School of Law
Downloads 0 (253,766)

Abstract:

DOJ, FTC, Antitrust, Guidelines, Licensing, FRAND

151.

'Characteristic of a Pirate': Willfulness and Treble Damages

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2811773
Number of pages: 3 Posted: 21 Jul 2016
Michael Feldman and Mark A. Lemley
Durie Tangri LLP and Stanford Law School
Downloads 0 (152,888)

Abstract:

152.

Did eBay Irreparably Injure Trademark Law?

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2808677
Number of pages: 26 Posted: 13 Jul 2016
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 0 (125,019)

Abstract:

153.

The Surprising Resilience of the Patent System

Texas Law Review, Vol. 95, No. 1, 2016, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2784456
Number of pages: 57 Posted: 27 May 2016 Last Revised: 20 Dec 2016
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 0 (41,977)

Abstract:

154.

Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age: 2016 - Chapters 1 and 2

Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age: 2016 , Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2780190
Number of pages: 185 Posted: 19 May 2016 Last Revised: 24 Jun 2016
Peter S. Menell, Mark A. Lemley and Robert P. Merges
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law, Stanford Law School and University of California, Berkeley - School of Law
Downloads 0 (4,260)
Citation 2

Abstract:

Intellectual Property, Trade Secret, Patent, Copyright, Trademark, Misappropriation, Right of Publicity

155.

Recent Developments in Patent Law (Spring 2016)

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2778163
Number of pages: 89 Posted: 13 May 2016
Mark A. Lemley and Madeleine Laupheimer
Stanford Law School and Stanford University, School of Law
Downloads 0 (74,916)

Abstract:

156.

Rethinking Assignor Estoppel

Houston Law Review, Vol. 54, No. 2, 2016, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 486, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2755785
Number of pages: 32 Posted: 30 Mar 2016 Last Revised: 12 Jan 2017
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 0 (108,210)

Abstract:

157.

How Often Do Non-Practicing Entities Win Patent Suits?

Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Forthcoming, Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 485, Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2750128, Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 16-08, Northwestern Law & Econ Research Paper No. 16-03
Number of pages: 88 Posted: 20 Mar 2016 Last Revised: 22 Apr 2016
John R. Allison, Mark A. Lemley and David L. Schwartz
University of Texas - McCombs School of Business, Stanford Law School and Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law
Downloads 0 (60,411)

Abstract:

158.

Patent Licensing, Technology Transfer, & Innovation

Stanford Law and Economics Olin Working Paper No. 484
Number of pages: 23 Posted: 28 Feb 2016 Last Revised: 01 Mar 2016
Mark A. Lemley and Robin Feldman
Stanford Law School and University of California Hastings College of the Law
Downloads 0 (36,675)

Abstract:

159.

Open Letter on Ethical Norms in Intellectual Property Scholarship

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2714416, Duke I&E Research Paper No. 16-7, Duke Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Series No. 2016-9
Number of pages: 14 Posted: 13 Jan 2016 Last Revised: 04 Mar 2016
Robin Feldman, Mark A. Lemley, Jonathan S. Masur and Arti K. Rai
University of California Hastings College of the Law, Stanford Law School, University of Chicago - Law School and Duke University School of Law
Downloads 0 (19,202)

Abstract:

160.

Brief of Thirty-Four Law Professors as Amici Curiae in Support of Appellants in Altera Corp. v. Papst Licensing GMBH

Southwestern Law School Research Paper No. 2015-25
Number of pages: 28 Posted: 22 Dec 2015 Last Revised: 02 Mar 2017
Debra Lyn Bassett, Anya Bernstein, Jeremy W. Bock, Patrick Joseph Borchers, Michael J. Burstein, Michael A. Carrier, Bernard Chao, Colleen V. Chien, Jorge L. Contreras, Scott Dodson, Joshua A. Douglas, Catherine Ross Dunham, Katherine Florey, Roger Allan Ford, Leah Chan Grinvald, Paul R. Gugliuzza, Timothy R. Holbrook, William Hubbard, Sapna Kumar, Megan M. La Belle, Mark A. Lemley, David I. Levine, Joseph Scott Miller, Patricia W. Hatamyar Moore, Ira Steven Nathenson, Xuan-Thao Nguyen, Philip A. Pucillo, Charles W. (Rocky) Rhodes IV, Cassandra Burke Robertson, Christopher B. Seaman, Gregory C. Sisk, Howard M. Wasserman, Buzz IV and Matthew K. Telford
Southwestern Law School, University at Buffalo Law School, University of Memphis - Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law, Creighton University School of Law, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Rutgers Law School, University of Denver Sturm College of Law, Santa Clara University - School of Law, University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law, University of California Hastings College of the Law, University of Kentucky - College of Law, Elon University School of Law, University of California, Davis, University of New Hampshire School of Law, Suffolk University Law School, Boston University School of Law, Emory University School of Law, University of Baltimore - School of Law, University of Houston Law Center, Catholic University of America (CUA) - Columbus School of Law, Stanford Law School, University of California Hastings College of the Law, University of Georgia Law School, St. Thomas University School of Law, St. Thomas University School of Law, Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law, Center for Intellectual Property & Innovation, Michigan State University College of Law, South Texas College of Law, Case Western Reserve University School of Law, Washington and Lee University School of Law, University of St. Thomas School of Law (Minnesota), Florida International University (FIU) - College of Law, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP and University of Pennsylvania Law School - Student/Alumni/Adjunct
Downloads 0 (265,736)

Abstract:

patent, declaratory judgment, jurisdiction, personal jurisdiction, patent assertion entity, minimum contacts

161.

Expecting the Unexpected

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2666626
Number of pages: 31 Posted: 29 Sep 2015
Mark A. Lemley
Stanford Law School
Downloads 0 (95,340)

Abstract:

Submit a Paper Section 508 Text Only Pages

Quick Links

Research Paper Series Conference Papers Partners in Publishing Organization Homepages Newsletter Sign Up

Rankings

Top Papers Top Authors Top Organizations

About

SSRN Objectives Network Directors Presidential Letter Announcements Contact us FAQs
Elsevier logo
Copyright Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy

Cookies are used by this site. To decline or learn more, visit our Cookies page. This page was processed by apollobot1 in 4.755 seconds

Relx Group logo