David S. Sibley

University of Texas at Austin - Department of Economics

John Michael Stuart Professor of Economics, University of Texas and Acting Deputy Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division

Austin, TX 78712

United States

  • University of Texas at Austin - Department of Economics

SCHOLARLY PAPERS

13

DOWNLOADS
Rank 18,941

SSRN RANKINGS

Top 18,941

in Total Papers Downloads

2,671

SSRN CITATIONS
Rank 23,163

SSRN RANKINGS

Top 23,163

in Total Papers Citations

11

CROSSREF CITATIONS

23

Scholarly Papers (13)

Actions:
Email selected abstracts
1.

An Antitrust Analysis of Bundled Loyalty Discounts

Economic Analysis Group Discussion Paper No. 04-13 (Revised)
Number of pages: 43 Posted: 07 Oct 2004
Patrick Greenlee, David S. Reitman and David S. Sibley
U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division, Government of the United States of America - Antitrust Division, Competition and Policy Section and University of Texas at Austin - Department of Economics
Downloads 1,209 (17,294)
Citation 17

Abstract:

Loading...

Loyalty discounts, fidelity programs, tying, exclusive dealing, nonlinear pricing

2.

Having Your Cake - How to Preserve Universal-Service Cross Subsidies While Facilitating Competitive Entry: A Response

Yale Journal on Regulation, Vol. 16, No. 2, 1999
Number of pages: 16 Posted: 25 Jun 2003
Michael J. Doane, David S. Sibley and Michael A. Williams
Competition Economics LLC, University of Texas at Austin - Department of Economics and Competition Economics LLC
Downloads 362 (86,264)
Citation 1

Abstract:

Loading...

Efficient component pricing rule, TELRIC pricing, marginal cost pricing, monopoly input, essential facilities

3.

Brief of Amici Curiae Economists in Support of Petitioners, Bell Atlantic V. Twombly

Number of pages: 30 Posted: 21 Jan 2009
William J. Baumol, Michael J. Boskin, Robert W. Crandall, Kenneth G. Elzinga, David S. Evans, Gerald R. Faulhaber, Franklin M. Fisher, Luke M. Froeb, Richard Gilbert, Paul L. Joskow, Michael L. Katz, Paul R. Milgrom, Thomas G. Moore, Janusz A. Ordover, Robert H. Porter, Frederic M. Scherer, Richard Schmalensee, Marius Schwartz, David S. Sibley, Vernon L. Smith, Edward A. Snyder, A. Michael Spence, Pablo T. Spiller, Alan Sykes, David Teece and Michael D. Whinston
New York University - Stern School of Business, Berkley Center for Entrepreneurial Studies, Stanford University - The Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace, Brookings Institution, University of Virginia - Department of Economics, Global Economics Group, University of Pennsylvania - Wharton School, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Department of Economics, Vanderbilt University - Owen Graduate School of Management, University of California, Berkeley - Department of Economics, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, University of California, Berkeley - Economic Analysis & Policy Group, Stanford University, affiliation not provided to SSRN, New York University (NYU) - Department of Economics, Northwestern University - Department of Economics, Harvard University - Harvard Kennedy School (HKS), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) - Sloan School of Management, Georgetown University, University of Texas at Austin - Department of Economics, Chapman University - Economic Science Institute, University of Chicago - Booth School of Business, Stanford Graduate School of Business, University of California, Berkeley - Business & Public Policy Group, Stanford University - Law School, Institute for Business Innovation and Sloan School of Management and Department of Economics
Downloads 212 (151,251)

Abstract:

Loading...

Twombly, Bell Atlantic, Bell Atlantic v Twombly, Amici Curiae, Sherman Section 1

4.

Pricing Access to a Monopoly Input

Downloads 207 (154,722)

Pricing Access to a Monopoly Input

Number of pages: 25 Posted: 02 Jun 2003
David S. Sibley, Michael J. Doane and Michael A. Williams
University of Texas at Austin - Department of Economics, Competition Economics LLC and Competition Economics LLC
Downloads 207 (154,495)
Citation 2

Abstract:

Loading...

efficient component pricing rule, TELRIC pricing, marginal cost pricing, monopoly input, essential facilities

Pricing Access to a Monopoly Input

Journal of Public Economic Theory, Forthcoming
Posted: 02 Jun 2003
David S. Sibley, Michael J. Doane and Michael A. Williams
University of Texas at Austin - Department of Economics, Competition Economics LLC and Competition Economics LLC

Abstract:

Loading...

efficient component pricing rule, TELRIC pricing, marginal cost pricing, monopoly input, essential facilities

5.

Economic Issues in U.S. V. Microsoft

UWLA Law Review Syposium, 2001
Number of pages: 47 Posted: 08 Aug 2003
Michael J. Doane, David S. Sibley and Ashish Nayyar
Competition Economics LLC, University of Texas at Austin - Department of Economics and ERS Group
Downloads 171 (183,935)

Abstract:

Loading...

Emerging Markets, Arbitrage, Threshold AR Models

6.

Vertical Contract That Reference Rivals

Number of pages: 47 Posted: 09 Nov 2016 Last Revised: 06 Aug 2017
Fan Liu, David S. Sibley and Wei Zhao
University of Texas at Austin - Department of Economics, University of Texas at Austin - Department of Economics and Competition Economics, LLC
Downloads 156 (198,994)

Abstract:

Loading...

Vertical Contract, Vertical Restraint, Margin Constraint, Everyday Low Price

7.

Effects of Spectrum Holdings on Equilibrium in the Wireless Industry

Number of pages: 45 Posted: 13 Jul 2015 Last Revised: 09 Apr 2016
Jonathan Lhost, Brijesh Pinto and David S. Sibley
Lawrence University - Department of Economics, Keystone Strategy, LLC and University of Texas at Austin - Department of Economics
Downloads 135 (223,866)
Citation 1

Abstract:

Loading...

Congestion Pricing, Spectrum Allocation, Quality Competition, Telecommunications, Networks, Industrial Organization

8.

Selected Economic Analysis at the Antitrust Division: The Year in Review

23 Review of Industrial Organization 95(2003)
Number of pages: 40 Posted: 27 Jan 2007
Ken Heyer and David S. Sibley
U.S. Department of Justice and University of Texas at Austin - Department of Economics
Downloads 99 (280,418)

Abstract:

Loading...

9.

The Year in Review: Economics at the Antitrust Division 2003-2004

25 Review of Industrial Organization 375(2004)
Number of pages: 20 Posted: 27 Jan 2007
Ken Heyer and David S. Sibley
U.S. Department of Justice and University of Texas at Austin - Department of Economics
Downloads 61 (371,417)

Abstract:

Loading...

antitrust, bundled discounts, mergers, merger remedies, two-sided markets

10.

Simulating Vertical Mergers and the Vertical GUPPI Approach

Number of pages: 20 Posted: 11 Sep 2019
Gleb B. Domnenko and David S. Sibley
Independent and University of Texas at Austin - Department of Economics
Downloads 57 (387,083)

Abstract:

Loading...

Vertical Mergers, UPPI, vGUPPI, Industrial Organization, Monte Carlo Simulations, Microeconomics

11.

Second Mover Advantage and Entry Timing

The Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 60, Issue 3, pp. 517-535, 2012
Number of pages: 19 Posted: 18 Oct 2012
Vinh Du Tran, David S. Sibley and Simon Wilkie
affiliation not provided to SSRN, University of Texas at Austin - Department of Economics and University of Southern California Law School
Downloads 2 (670,496)
  • Add to Cart

Abstract:

Loading...

12.

U.S. V. Microsoft: Were the Exclusionary Practices Anticompetitive?

Computer Industry Committee Newsletter, Vol. 5, No. 1, Spring 2000, American Bar Association, Copyright
Posted: 21 Aug 2003
David S. Sibley and Michael J. Doane
University of Texas at Austin - Department of Economics and Competition Economics LLC

Abstract:

Loading...

Antitrust, U.S. DOJ, Microsoft, monopolization, exclusionary practices, network industry, monopoly tipping

13.

U.S. V. Microsoft: Is the Proposed Settlement in the Public Interest?

Computer Industry Committee Newsletter, Vol. 7, No. 1, Spring 2002, American Bar Assosciation, Copyright
Posted: 21 Aug 2003
David S. Sibley and Michael J. Doane
University of Texas at Austin - Department of Economics and Competition Economics LLC

Abstract:

Loading...

Antitrust, US DOJ, Microsoft, Tunney Act