Charles N. W. Keckler

Schar School of Policy & Government, GMU

Founders Hall, Fifth Floor

3351 Fairfax Drive, MS 3B1

Arlington, VA 22201

United States

SCHOLARLY PAPERS

5

DOWNLOADS

383

SSRN CITATIONS

0

CROSSREF CITATIONS

0

Scholarly Papers (5)

1.

The Hazards of Precedent: A Parameterization of Legal Change

George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 05-36, 2nd Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper, Mississippi Law Journal, Forthcoming
Number of pages: 80 Posted: 04 Nov 2005 Last Revised: 27 Apr 2010
Charles N. W. Keckler
Schar School of Policy & Government, GMU
Downloads 212 (238,053)

Abstract:

Loading...

overruling, judicial behavior, stare decisis, citation analysis, regression, legal dynamics, path-dependence, dissent

2.

Lawyered Up

Thomas M. Cooley Law Review, Forthcoming, Penn State Legal Studies Research Paper No. 14-2009
Number of pages: 44 Posted: 07 Sep 2009 Last Revised: 28 Apr 2010
Charles N. W. Keckler
Schar School of Policy & Government, GMU
Downloads 149 (323,863)

Abstract:

Loading...

social capital, law and culture, legal services, cultural cognition, tort reform

3.

The One and the Many: Bipartisan Leadership as Second-Best Bureaucracy

Number of pages: 88 Posted: 08 Jun 2020
Charles N. W. Keckler
Schar School of Policy & Government, GMU
Downloads 22 (831,676)

Abstract:

Loading...

Administrative Law, Independent Agencies, Separation-of-Powers, Formal Models of Law, Second-Best, Bipartisanship

4.

Cross-Examining the Brain: A Legal Analysis of Neural Imaging for Credibility Impeachment

Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 57, No. 3, 2006
Posted: 22 Jun 2007
Charles N. W. Keckler
Schar School of Policy & Government, GMU

Abstract:

Loading...

evidence, lie-detection, credibility, scientific admissibility, impeachment

5.

Life v. Death: Who Should Capital Punishment Marginally Deter?

Journal of Law, Economics and Policy, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2006
Posted: 22 Jun 2007
Charles N. W. Keckler
Schar School of Policy & Government, GMU

Abstract:

Loading...

capital punishment, rational choice, death penalty, criminal behavior, deterrence, sentencing policy