P.O. Box 751
Mclean, VA 22101
United States
Lodestar Law and Economics
SSRN RANKINGS
in Total Papers Downloads
in Total Papers Citations
plastic, environment, pollution, e-coli
Apple, Carl Shapiro, error costs, exclusion, FTC, Federal Trade Commission, Frank Easterbrook, Larry Page, Linux, microprocessor, network effects, Ronald Coase, search engine, Sergey Brin, Sherman Act, Vons Grocery, William E. Kovacic, Yahoo
antitrust, hipster, corporate concentration, FTC, mergers, Section 7, Sherman Act, consumer welfare, platforms
Amartya Sen, bounded rationality, CFPB, Cass Sunstein, cognitive biases, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Demsetz, Elizabeth Warren, Friedrich von Hayek, happiness, health, information, John Stuart Mill, nudge, perfect competition, rational maximizers, Richard Thaler, transaction costs, wealth
antitrust, bundling, competitive harm, empirical evidence, exclusionary conduct, exclusive dealing, loyalty discounts, market power, monopolization, procompetitive efficiencies, tying
accountability, Asia, Australia, bid-rigging, commission, compliance, European Union, horizontal price-fixing, incentive, inefficient, Latin America, leniency policies, market, non-collusive vertical restraints, recidivism, South Africa, Sweden, U.K. Office of Fair Trading, white collar crime
Christine Varney, Concentration/Price Relationship, Decision Theory, FTC, Federal Trade Commission, Google, Justice Department, Law and Economics, Linux, Microsoft, Monopolization, Network Effects, RPM, Uncertainty
B40, B41, K00, K21, L10, L12, L40, L41, L42, O38
algorithm, bomb, Bracha, commission, Customer Reservation Systems, engines, essential facilities, federal, hits, Internet, link farms, mergers, Microsoft, monopolization, non-objective, organic, Pasquale, precision, Raff, ranking, recall, regulations, relevance, spam logs, technology, unadulterated
systematic behavioral biases, behavioral law and economics, paternalism, consumer contracts, behavioral economic analysis, consumer bias, conventional price theory
Hipster Antitrust, New Brandeis, consumer welfare, Bork, economics
Antitrust, monopolization, category management, competition for distribution, exclusive dealing, shelf space, slotting allowances
Slotting allowances, shelf space, vertical restraints, product placement
category management, exclusive dealing, vertical restraints, slotting allowances, antitrust
adverse selection, asymmetric information, automatic underwriting, color-blind, consumer credit, credit worthy, FICO, financial crisis, liquidity constraint, moral hazard, mortgages, overdraft protection, risk analysis, securitization, subprime, supernanny
Andrew Ferguson, Avishalom Tor, Cass Sunstein, Chicago School, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Elizabeth Warren, Federal Trade Commission, J. Thomas Rosch, Libertarian Paternalism, Maurice Stucke, mergers, Michael Grunwald, monopolization, nudge, policymakers, price-fixing, Richard Thaler
2G, AOL, AT&T, Apple iPhone, Comcast, content layer, D.C. Circuit, developers, e-commerce, ESPN3, Fairness Doctrine, First Amendment, Google, ISP, incentives, innovation, MetroPCS, NN, NTT DoCoMo, peer-to-peer, reason, restraints, telecommunications, transport, VoIP, video streaming, Yahoo, YouTube
ABA Task Force, battle of the experts, Bork, competition law, Daubert, econometrics, expert witness, FTC, George Mason University Law and Economics Center, Mandel, political economy, Posner, Sherman Act
antitrust, federalism, opportunism, patent holdup, preemption, royalty stacking, standard setting
Securities, law, antitrust, restraint, regulation, patents, holdup, standard
bundling, competition policy, disclosure rules, Essential Facilities Doctrine, innovation, licensing obligations, market power, monopsony power, network effects, property rights, Qualcomm, Rambus, SSOs, standard setting organizations, transactional costs
above-cost discounting, abusive, act, comparative institutional analysis, credit cards, deceptive, disclosure, Dodd-Frank, economics, Elizabeth Warren, FTC, FTCA, Federal Trade Commission, market failures, Oren Bar-Gill, price theory, product bundling, Richard Cordray, Robert Bork, unfair practices
Antitrust Modernization Committee, Baker, Gilbert, Katz, Merger Guidelines, Muris, patent, Rapp, Schumpeter, Shelanski, Sherman Act, Sunshine, uncertainty
Chicago School, antitrust, Leegin, Twombly, Supreme Court, resale price maintenance, vertical restraints, Dr. Miles, Harvard School, stare decisis, Weyerhaeuser, predatory bidding
Bain, Bork, competition, Demsetz, Director, Easterbrook, error/cost, exclusive dealing, game theory, plausibility test, Posner, RPM, resale price maintenance, Sherman Act, Stigler, Wall
Administrative Law, Antitrust, Competition, Economics, Empirical, Enforcement, Federal Agencies, Federal Courts, Federal Trade Commission, Litigation, Market Share, Merger, U.S. Supreme Court
Antonin Scalia, Areeda, business models, exclusive dealing, Hovenkamp, innovation markets, Joseph Schumpeter, Kenneth Arrow, mergers, monopolization, monopoly, new products, price predation, recoupment, Richard J. Gilbert, Sherman Act, strategic entry deterrence, Syufy Enterprises, Trinko, Verizon
AOL, Adam Ruff, Ask, Bing, Blekko, Danny Sullivan, Edelman, Expedia, foreclosure, hearing, Lockwood, maps, Microsoft, monopolization, One Box, power, Senate, ten blue links, Yahoo, YouTube
Standard setting, antitrust, patents, intellectual property, patent holdup, contracts, FTC, DOJ, injunctions
Clayton, DOJ, Department of Justice, exclusive dealing, International Salt Co. v. United States, minimum efficient scale, monopolization, Nashville Coal, Robert Bork, Section 2, share discounts, shelf space agreements, Sherman Act, Standard Oil, Steven Salop, Tampa Electric, Thomas Krattenmaker
vertical mergers, foreclosure, antitrust, DOJ, double marginalization
buyer power, monopolization, monopsony, slotting allowances
detachment, econometrics, empirical, law and economics, mathematical formalizations, mathematization, Olin Foundation, scholarship, trends, truthonthemarket.com
Armen Alchian, behavioral economics, Benjamin Klein, empiricism, error costs, Frank Easterbrook, George Stigler, Harold Demsetz, jurisprudence, Lester Telser, market, mergers, Milton Friedman, monopolization, oligopoly, paradox, price, Richard Posner, Robert Bork, Ronald Coase, vertical restraints
3M Co., Apple, CID, Civil Investigative Demand, Credit Suisse, Federal Trade Commission, Google, H&R Block, ITA, Intel Corporation, LePage’s Inc., Milton Friedman, N-Data, Nevada, South Africa, Trinko, UnitedHealth Group, United States v. Otis Elevator Company, Wal-Mart, welfare, William E. Kovacic
antitrust, competition law, non-compete clauses, labor economics
AMD, Brooke Group, CPU, Credit Suisse, error-cost framework, European Union, exclusive dealing, FTC, Frank Easterbrook, Kovacic, Linkline Communications, market share, monopolization, original equipment manufacturers, share-based discounts, Stephen Breyer, Supreme Court, Trinko, unfair competition
Alchian, Bilski, Coase, Demsetz, hold-up, Joskow, Klein, North, royalty stacking, SSOs, Schumpeter, standard setting organizations, technology, Williamson
antitrust, consumer welfare, cost-benefit analysis, deceptive practices, digital economy, Federal Trade Commission, FTC, law and economics, privacy
antitrust, big data, merger, market definition, exclusionary conduct
antitrust, FRAND, licensing, patent holdup, standard essential patent, SEP, standard setting organizations, SSOs
managed care, pharmacy benefit managers, spending, selective contracting
anticompetitive exclusion, antitrust law, conditional discounts, exclusive dealing, loyalty discounts, price-cost tests, price predation, predatory pricing, raising rivals’ costs, RRC, rule of reason
Net Neutrality, Antitrust, Rule of Reason, Title II, Broadband, Federal Trade Commission, Federal Communications Commission, Price Discrimination, Vertical Restraints
ABC, Albaek, alcoholism, cartel, Costco, collusion, drunk driving, exclusive dealing arrangements, federalism, franchise, most-favored customer, New York, preemption, price-fixing, Sherman Act, state action, TFWS Inc. v. Schaefer, teen drinking, temperance, three-tier system, 21st amendment
Barack Obama, behavioral economics, credit cards, Elizabeth Warren, Federal Trade Commission, Financial Regulatory Reform, Michael Barr, new paternalism, Oren Bar-Gill, plain vanilla, regulation, White Paper
antitrust, consumer, David Evans, entrant, entry, exclusion, free ride, Heide, monopolist, predation, retailers
Forclosure, antitrust, economics, exclusionary conduct, Tampa Electric, Standard Stations, DOJ complaint, Google
anticompetitive, Broadcom v. Qualcomm, deceptive act, level of causation, memory chip developer, monopolization, NYNEX, RAND commitment
ad hoc, asymmetry, contract, copyright, economic theory, empirical data, injunctive relief, inhospitability tradition, IP Guidelines, IPR, licensing, patent, patent pool, patent holdup, per se, presumption, RAND, reasonable and nondiscriminatory, refusal to deal, SEP, SSO, standards setting
Qualcomm, monopolization, FTC, antitrust, intellectual property, refusal to deal, Trinko, Linkline, exclusive dealing, Sherman Act, Apple
Actavis, reverse payments, settlements, antitrust, pharmaceutical, FTC, Hatch-Waxman, patents, rule of reason
Antitrust, Consent, Commitments, FTC, DOJ, Litigation, Settlement, Regulation, Enforcement, Competition, Consumer Welfare, Economics
platforms, multi-sided markets, two-sided markets, antitrust, credit cards, payment cards, rule of reason, Supreme Court, burden shifting
Apple v. Pepper, Pass-Through, Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Ad Valorem, Antitrust, Illinois Brick, American Express, Indirect Purchaser, Sherman Act, Direct Purchaser, Monopolization
slotting allowances, vertical restraints, natural experiment, shelf space, exclusive dealing
antitrust, Chicago School, New Institutional Economics, Roberts Court, Supreme Court, TCE, Transaction Cost Economics
Areeda, Broadcast Music, Clayton Act, Columbia Broadcasting System, Continental T.V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania, demand, discrimination, FTC, Federal Trade Commission, Hovenkamp, liability, maintenance, modernization, price-fixing, resale, restraint, Section 5, Sherman, small businesses, supply, surplus
antitrust, antitrust law, antitrust agencies, antitrust enforcement, consumer welfare, market power
antitrust; populism; digital; competition
antitrust, unilateral effects, monopolization, loyalty discounts, Section 2, FTC, safe harbors, error costs, innovation, presumptions, competition, trade, mergers
adjudicative, Article III, Brazil, Bureau of Economics, center, China, Clayton, competition, European Union, Gene Brewer, Gwendolyn Bell, India, Jay Kesan, Jonathan Nash, Michael Baye, price fixing, Rafael Pardo, reversal rate, Richard Posner, Robinson-Patman, Section 5, Sherman Act, William Kovac
AMD, antitrust, Apple, BLS, Bayesian, Bureau of Labor Statistics, error-cost framework, ex ante, FTC, Google, loyalty discounts, microprocessors, monopolization, post, share data
horizontal restraints, ancillary restraints, joint ventures, three tenors, rule of reason
antitrust law, competition, consumer welfare, contract, eBay, exclusion order, FRAND terms, injunction, innovation, ITC, MercExchange, monetary damages, Noerr-Pennington doctrine, remedies, standard essential patent, SEP, standard-setting organization, SSO, standardization
antitrust, asset specificity, contract interpretation, contract theory, franchising, hold-up, industrial organization, theory of the firm, vertical restraints
behavioral economics, borrowing, consumer protection, credit cards, Elizabeth Warren, FDIC, Federal Reserve Board, financial crisis, Michael Barr, National Credit Union Administration, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Office of Thrift Supervision, Oren Bar-Gill, Truth-in-Lending Act
Federal Trade Commission, Section 5, unfair method of competition, common law, antitrust, rule of reason
net neutrality, antitrust, discrimination, Federal Communications Commission, telecommunications, broadband regulation, Title II, vertical foreclosure
platforms, multi-sided markets, two-sided markets, complements, antitrust, credit cards, payment cards, rule of reason, Supreme Court, burden shifting
antitrust, comity, competition, foreign law, FRAND, FTC, intellectual property, IPRs, patent licensing, standard-essential patents, SEPs
mergers, antitrust, efficiencies, Kovacic, out-of-market, cross-market balancing
Antitrust Populism, Mergers, Vertical Integration, Economic Analysis
product hopping, product switching, antitrust, sham innovation
copyright, deceptive conduct, Dell, discovery, Federal Trade Commission, invention, monopolization, monopsony, Rambus, SSO, Unocal
Anti-Competitive, Antitrust, Consumer Welfare, Collective Action, Customers, Demand Elasticity, Efficiency, Exclusive Shelf-Space Contracts, Frank Easterbrook, Gpos, Goodwill, Herbert Hovenkamp, Market Share, Pbms, Philip Areeda, Predatory Pricing, Price Discrimination, Robinson-Patman Act, Tie-Ins
MasterCard, single entity, Copperweld
appeals, Canada, caseload, comparative, competition, complex, Diane Wood, European Union, FTC, Federal Trade Commission, frequent exposure, judicial, justice, margin squeeze, output, predatory pricing, quality, regulatory, Richard Posner, subject, UK, United Kingdom, vertical restraint, workload
antitrust, competition, consumer welfare, DOJ, FRAND, FTC, injunctive relief, intellectual property rights, IPR, standard development organizations, SDOs, standard essential patents, SEPs, standard setting organizations, SSOs
Standard Essential Patent, SEP, patent, intellectual property, IP, royalties, injunction
antitrust law, competition, innovation, intellectual property, litigation, patent assertion entities, PAE, United States Patent and Trademark Office, PTO
administrative expertise, business regulation, causes of action, common law limitations, deceptive practices, fraud, market forces, National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, Posner, printer’s ink laws, Ralph Nader, remedies, statute of frauds, UDTPA, unfair, warranty disclaimers
Federal Trade Commission, economics, consumer protection, privacy, data security, deception, unfairness, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Section 5, FTC, antitrust, patent holdup, Google, Intel, invitations to collude, Federal Trade Commission, administrative agencies
Antitrust Modernization Committee, Brown Shoe, Carl Shapiro, Donald Turner, F.T.C. v. Staples, GUPPI, gross upward pricing pressure index, Kathleen Bradish, Leah Brannon, Philadelphia National Bank, Section 7, Von’s Grocery
digital monopolists, digital economy, digital markets, Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google, Easterbrook Theorem, antitrust law, monopolization law
Antitrust, standard of proof, deterrence, Easterbrook.
antitrust, competition law, vertical integration, vertical mergers, vertical controls, elimination of double marginalization, raising rivals' costs
big data, antitrust, entry barrier, barriers to entry, antitrust law, U.S. antitrust agencies
Consents, Settlements, Federal Trade Commission, Antitrust Division, Judicial Review
consumer protection, FTC, Federal Trade Commission, financial crisis, financial regulation, IBBEA, Interstate Banking and Branch Efficiency Act, liquidity constraint, mortgage, small business, subprime, supernanny, Truth in Lending Act
European Commission, two-sided markets, platform, economics, public choice, regulatory capture, privacy, data security, regulation, survey methodology
antitrust, antimonopoly, cartels, competition, disgorgement, due process, economic theory, illegal gains, mitigation, monetary penalties, settlement, surcharge
Bell Atlantic v. Twombly, Copperweld, Drew Brees, franchises, Independence Tube, Iqbal, John Paul Stevens, Lear Siegler, licensing, MasterCard, Phillip Areeda, professional, Roger Goodell, Rule of Reason, Section 1, Sherman Act, single entity, sports leagues, theory of the firm, Visa, Yellow Cab
European Commission, relevant market, community competition law, antitrust enforcement, competition policy
Sherman Act, antitrust law, reform, industrial organization economists, nirvana fallacy, competition
Federal Trade Commission, FTC, Federal Communications Commission, FCC, Department of Justice, DOJ, Antitrust Division
antitrust, Federal Trade Commission, hearings, competition, consumer protection, consumer welfare standard
comparable licenses, competition, excessive pricing prohibition, innovation, intellectual property right, IPRs, patent law, price regulation, royalties, standard-essential patents, SEPs, U.S. antitrust agencies
antitrust, federal trade commission, inherently suspect, horizontal restraints, consumer welfare, rule of reason
antitrust, competition policy, horizontal mergers, vertical mergers, Merger Guidelines, Federal Trade Commission, Department of Justice, Clayton Act, Sherman Act, FTC Act, market power, market concentration, nascent competition, potential competition, killer acquisitions, counterfactuals
AMC, Antitrust Modernization Committee Report, DuPont, EPA, FDA, FTC, Frank Easterbrook, Harold Demsetz, Independent Ink, John Paul Stevens, Ken Arrow, Monsanto, Patents, Supreme Court, Timothy Muris, Transgenic, Vertical Efficiencies
McWane, antitrust, exclusive dealing, loyalty discounts, Microsoft, exclusion, Federal Trade Commission, monopolization, predatory pricing, economics
labor contracts, non-compete clauses, monopsony, vertical restraints, contracting externalities, natural experiments, statistical inference, calibration, training, human capital, trade secrets
digital sector, digital platforms, digital marketplace, antitrust, anticompetitive conduct, anticompetitive transactions, monopoly power, monopolization, consumer welfare standard
India, CCI, FRAND, Standard-Essential Patents, SEPs, Excessive Pricing
antitrust, broad, Clayton Act, coordinated effects, Crane, critical loss analysis, FTC, Federal Trade Commission, intellectual property, Kaiser, Moresi, narrow, Philadelphia National Bank, Salop, Section 7, unilateral, Wall
Google, Search, Antitrust, Yelp, Local, Monopolization, RCT, Product Design, Innovation, FTC, Methodology, Section 2
digital platforms, antitrust law, economics, policy, consumer protection, market power, Australian Competition & Consumer Commission
horizontal agreement, competition policy, efficiencies, sustainability, greenwashing, carbon tax, European Green Deal, Austrian Federal Competition Authority
price discrimination, antitrust, market power, patents, Independent Ink
biotech, Charles Chuck Grassley, Christine Varney, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Congress, DOA, error costs, FTC, Federal Trade Commission, GAO, Harold Demsetz, innovation, Justice Department, Kovacic, Monsanto, politics, Richard Posner, seeds, Shapiro, Timothy Muris
patent assertion entities, non-practicing entities, trolls, Federal Trade Commission, patents, intellectual property, antitrust, economics
antitrust, Federal Trade Commission, hearings, competition, consumer protection, data science, advertising, brick-and-mortar, barriers to entry
antitrust, Federal Trade Commission, hearings, competition, consumer protection, vertical mergers
consumer protection, unfairness, deception, tort reform, economics, jurisdictional competition, federalism, Federal Trade Commission, privacy
antitrust, vertical mergers, bargaining, Nash bargaining model, SEPs, FRAND, vertical GUPPI
China's Anti-Monopoly Law, AML, Antitrust and Intellectual Property, Standard-Essential Patents, FRAND
digital platforms, targeted obligations, regulation, self-preferencing, defaults, interoperability, cost-benefit analysis, ACCC, GDPR
standard-setting organization, standard-essential patent, licensing, platform, antitrust
China, Anti-Monopoly Law, vertical restraints, excessive pricing, merger review, intellectual property, collective dominance, refusal to deal
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission, ACCC, Australian Competition Tribunal, digital platform services, competition law, competition policy, antitrust, social media, app stores
Qualcomm, Federal Trade Commission, bargaining model, antitrust, monopolization, Section 5, refusal to deal, intellectual property
U.S. Antitrust Agencies, Department of Justice, Federal Trade Commission, licensing, intellectual property, standard-essential patents, SEPs,
antitrust, competition policy, horizontal mergers, vertical mergers, Merger Guidelines, Federal Trade Commission, Department of Justice, Clayton Act, Sherman Act, FTC Act, market power, market concentration, labor markets, monopsony
Apple, consumer welfare, competition, digital platforms, Federal Trade Commission, FTC, multisided platform markets, platform economics, product design, section 5(n), unfairness
antitrust, Canadian Competition Bureau, competition, FRAND terms, injunctive relief, Intellectual Property Enforcement Guidelines, patent ambush, product switching, reverse-payment settlements, standard-essential patent, SEP
antitrust, Federal Trade Commission, hearings, competition, consumer protection
Federal Trade Commission, privacy, deception, economics, platforms, Apple, consumer protection
antitrust law, contract law, enforcement, optimal deterrence, patent holdup, patent law, U.S. Supreme Court
antitrust, standard essential patents, KFTC, holdup, licensing, FRAND, standard setting organizations
antitrust, competition policy, horizontal mergers, vertical mergers, Merger Guidelines, Federal Trade Commission, Department of Justice, Clayton Act, Sherman Act, FTC Act, market power, efficiencies, competitive process, competitive externalities, compensating marginal cost reduction, Herfindahl-Hir
FRAND, SEP, standard-essential patent, India, competition, antitrust, excessive royalties, injunction
antitrust, competition law, digital markets, platforms, network effects, regulation
antitrust, Federal Trade Commission, hearings, competition, consumer protection, corporate concentration
antitrust, barrier to entry, big data, data, differential pricing, economics, firm size, innovation, privacy, regulation
China, National Development and Reform Commission, Antitrust, Intellectual Property, Patents, Holdup, Antimonopoly, Unfairly High Pricing, Excessive Pricing
China's Anti-Monopoly Law, Anti-Unfair Competition Law, bundling, unfair competition, unfair methods of competition
Advo, Brooke Group Ltd., Brown & Williamson Tobacco, Chicago School, Christopher, discounts, Donald, FTC, Federal Trade Commission, Frank Easterbrook, Harvard, Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., monopolization, Phillip, Richard Posner, Section 2, Sherman Act, William Kovacic
Disgorgement, Fines, Optimal Penalties, Antitrust, Anti-Monopoly Law, China, National Development Reform Commission
antitrust law, Anti-Unfair Competition Law, AUCL, China competition law, competitive process, consumer welfare, economic efficiency, effects-based approach, ex ante fairness, law and economics, superior bargaining power, unfair methods of competition, unfairness liability, U.S. competition policy
Donnelley Act of 1899, Twenty-First Century Antitrust Act, S.933, Sherman Act, abuse of dominance, unilateral business conduct, monopoly power, exclusionary practices
Antitrust, ICLE Affiliate Publication
European Commission, standard-essential patents, SEPs, antitrust, standard-setting organizations, SSOs, intellectual property rights policies, essentiality
antitrust, Federal Trade Commission, hearings, competition, consumer protection, FRAND, SEPs, Standard Essential Patent
price, regulation, antitrust, natural monopoly, market failure,
antitrust, Federal Trade Commission, hearings, competition, consumer protection, platforms
FTC, consumer protection, benefit-cost analysis, cost-benefit analysis, Section 5, privacy, CPA
antitrust, standard-essential patents, KFTC, holdup, licensing, FRAND, standard-setting organizations
German competition law, GWB Digitalization Act, German competition policy, mandatory access remedies, abuse of dominance
Federal Trade Commission, Deception, Consumer Privacy, Consumer Protection, Materiality
China, Anti-Monopoly Law, monopoly agreements, monopoly conduct, intellectual property, internet platforms, resale price maintenance
China, SAIC, Anti-Monopoly Law, intellectual property, standard-essential patents, injunctions
National Development and Reform Commission, Antitrust, Intellectual Property, Patents, Holdup, Antimonopoly
price fixing, cartels, antitrust, collusion, antitrust penalties, antitrust sanctions, antitrust damages, antitrust fines, corporate fines, price fixing penalties
antitrust, competition policy, horizontal mergers, vertical mergers, Merger Guidelines, Federal Trade Commission, Department of Justice, Clayton Act, Sherman Act, FTC Act, legal presumptions, monopoly, market power, market concentration, Herfindahl-Hirschman Index
antimonopoly, antitrust, China, discriminatory treatment, injunctive relief, intellectual property, National Development and Reform Commission, NDRC, patent, unfairly high royalties
accounting measures, corporate ignorance, corporate malfeasance, Gretchen Morgenstern, Jeff Lipshaw, Larry Ribstein, Matt Bodie, PrawfsBlawg, securities regulation, stock options, taxation of compensation
vertical restraints, resale price maintenance, RPM, foreclosure, multi-sided platforms, refusals to deal, tying, Japan Fair Trade Commission, unfair trade practices
Antitrust, Competition Law, Market Concentration, Digital Platforms, Algorithmic Collusion, Predatory Innovation, Data Rights
Japan Fair Trade Commission, Antimonopoly Act, Surcharges, Penalties, Due Process, Settlement, Leniency
antitrust law, Draft Partial Amendment to the Guidelines for the Use of Intellectual Property under the Antimonopoly Act, FRAND terms, injunctive relief, innovation, Japan Fair Trade Commission, JFTC, patent holdup, standard essential patent, SEP, standardization
antitrust, competition policy, horizontal mergers, vertical mergers, Merger Guidelines, Federal Trade Commission, Department of Justice, Clayton Act, Sherman Act, FTC Act
antitrust, competition law, consumer protection, Federal Trade Commission, online advertising, unfair method of competition, Chevron deference, First Amendment
wage-fixing, no-poaching, Competition Act of Canada, per se liability, criminal sanctions, information exchange, ancillary restraints, franchisor-franchisee coordination, intra-enterprise coordination, employment-independent contractor distinction
antitrust, standard essential patents (SEPs), standard setting organizations (SSOs), standard development organizations (SDOs), FRAND, patent holdup & holdout, patent injunctions, USPTO, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, National Institute of Standards and Technology, F/RAND, DOJ
transaction cost, non-linear pricing, Coase, Demsetz, frictionless market, consumer welfare
Antitrust, state, federalism, competition
competition, antitrust, market definition, supply-side substitution
antitrust, exemption, implied immunity, regulation, State Action
Vietnam Competition Authority, vertical restraints, predatory pricing, tying, exclusive dealing, refusals to deal, market power, market share, dominance
Federal Trade Commission, FTC, First Amendment, 1st Amendment, Censorship, FTC Section 5, Preventing Online Censorship, Twitter, Social Media
antitrust, Federal Trade Commission, hearings, competition, consumer protection, rule of reason
Consent decree, antitrust remedy, structural remedy, conduct remedy, behavioral remedy, economic analysis, institutional safeguard, vertical acquisition, horizontal acquisition, arbitration
antitrust, state licensing boards, occupational licensing, state action doctrine, Teladoc, innovation
antitrust, economics, licensing, hold out, hold up, infringe, negotiations, standard essential patents, safe harbor, SEPs, standard setting
antitrust, cartel, leniency, marker, bookmark
guidelines, structural transaction, merger, acquisition, concentration, economics, economic analysis, flexibility, remedy, structural remedy, behavioral remedy, upfront buyer requirement, monitoring, mix-and-match, divestiture, multiproduct firm, empirical analysis
Antitrust, competition, regulation
antitrust, settlement, consent, relief, economics
United States of America, Unfair Practices, Modernization, Institutions, Consumer Welfare
United States of America, International, Rule of reason, Effect on competition, Pay-for-delay, Competition policy, Pharmaceutical
