Aysel Küçüksu

University of Copenhagen - iCourts - Centre of Excellence for International Courts

Studiestraede 6

Copenhagen, DK-1455

Denmark

  • University of Copenhagen - iCourts - Centre of Excellence for International Courts

SCHOLARLY PAPERS

3

DOWNLOADS

234

SSRN CITATIONS

0

CROSSREF CITATIONS

0

Scholarly Papers (3)

Actions:
Email selected abstracts
1.

Enforcing Rights Beyond Litigation: Mapping HRO Strategies in Monitoring ECtHR Judgment Implementation

iCourts Working Paper Series, no. 264, Forthcoming in the Human Rights Law Review 2022
Number of pages: 26 Posted: 17 Dec 2021
Aysel Küçüksu
University of Copenhagen - iCourts - Centre of Excellence for International Courts
Downloads 110 (421,822)

Abstract:

Loading...

Monitoring compliance with judgments, European Court of Human Rights, Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, non-governmental organisations (NGO), Rule 9, judgment implementation

2.

Fineman in Luxembourg: Empirical Lessons in Asylum Seeker Vulnerability from the CJEU

iCourts Working Paper Series No. 286 (2022), Forthcoming in The Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 2022
Number of pages: 30 Posted: 06 May 2022
Aysel Küçüksu
University of Copenhagen - iCourts - Centre of Excellence for International Courts
Downloads 81 (515,126)

Abstract:

Loading...

CJEU, case law, asylum, migrant, vulnerability theory, Fineman, international protection

3.

Adjudicating Asylum as a Technical Matter at the European Court of Justice: Neglecting Human Rights When the CEAS Appears to be in Jeopardy

Forthcoming in E. Kassoti and N. Idriz (eds.), The Informalisation of the EU’s External Action in the Field of Migration and Asylum, Global Europe: Legal and Policy Issues of the EU’s External Action, 2022, iCourts Working Paper Series, no. 278
Number of pages: 22 Posted: 01 Mar 2022
Aysel Küçüksu
University of Copenhagen - iCourts - Centre of Excellence for International Courts
Downloads 43 (708,218)

Abstract:

Loading...

European Court of Justice, asylum policy, migration, judicial reasoning, effectiveness, human rights