David Nickerson

University of Notre Dame

361 Mendoza College of Business

Notre Dame, IN 46556-5646

United States

  • University of Notre Dame

SCHOLARLY PAPERS

9

DOWNLOADS

573

CITATIONS

3

Scholarly Papers (9)

Actions:
Email selected abstracts
1.

Political Campaigns and Big Data

HKS Working Paper No. RWP13-045
Number of pages: 35 Posted: 15 Nov 2013 Last Revised: 12 Jun 2014
David Nickerson and Todd Rogers
University of Notre Dame and Harvard University - Harvard Kennedy School (HKS)
Downloads 447 (63,247)
Citation 1

Abstract:

Loading...

2.

Beliefs about Ballot Monitoring in Latin America

APSA 2014 Annual Meeting Paper
Number of pages: 37 Posted: 02 Sep 2014
Chad Kiewiet de Jonge and David Nickerson
University of Notre Dame and University of Notre Dame
Downloads 63 (346,161)

Abstract:

Loading...

3.

The Role of Access to Ballots in Gotv Campaigns: Evidence from a Field Experiment

APSA 2013 Annual Meeting Paper, American Political Science Association 2013 Annual Meeting
Number of pages: 30 Posted: 22 Aug 2013
Israel Waismel-Manor, Daphna Canetti, Joseph Sarid and David Nickerson
University of Haifa, University of Haifa, affiliation not provided to SSRN and University of Notre Dame
Downloads 38 (430,148)

Abstract:

Loading...

GOTV, voting, distance, ballot, turnout, Israel

4.

Racial Differences in Inequality Aversion: Evidence from Real World Respondents in the Ultimatum Game

Downloads 25 (490,509)

Racial Differences in Inequality Aversion: Evidence from Real World Respondents in the Ultimatum Game

IZA Discussion Paper No. 5569
Number of pages: 63 Posted: 21 Mar 2011
John D. Griffin, David Nickerson and Abigail Wozniak
University of Notre Dame - Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame and University of Notre Dame
Downloads 15 (569,245)

Abstract:

Loading...

racial differences, inequality aversion, ultimatum game, artefactual experiments

Racial Differences in Inequality Aversion: Evidence from Real World Respondents in the Ultimatum Game

NBER Working Paper No. w17097
Number of pages: 62 Posted: 31 May 2011
John D. Griffin, David Nickerson and Abigail Wozniak
University of Notre Dame - Department of Political Science, University of Notre Dame and University of Notre Dame
Downloads 10 (603,272)

Abstract:

Loading...

5.

Do You Have a Voting Plan? Implementation Intentions, Voter Turnout, and Organic Plan Making

Psychological Science, Vol. 21, pp. 194-199, 2010
Posted: 12 May 2011
David Nickerson and Todd Rogers
University of Notre Dame and Harvard University - Harvard Kennedy School (HKS)

Abstract:

Loading...

implementation intentions, self-prediction, voting, nudges

6.

Partisan Mobilization Using Volunteer Phone Banks and Door Hangers

The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 601, No. 10, 2005
Posted: 25 May 2010
David Nickerson
University of Notre Dame

Abstract:

Loading...

experiment, flyer, door-to-door, partisan, mobilization, vote choice, turnout, phone

7.

Modeling Certainty with Clustered Data: A Comparison of Methods

Political Analysis, Vol. 17, Issue 2, pp. 177-190, 2009
Posted: 18 Aug 2009
Kevin Arceneaux and David Nickerson
Temple University - Department of Political Science and University of Notre Dame

Abstract:

Loading...

8.

Getting Out the Vote in Local Elections: Results from Six Door-to-Door Canvassing Experiments

The Journal of Politics, Vol. 65, No. 4, pp. 1083-1096, 2003
Posted: 22 Dec 2008
Donald P. Green, Alan Gerber and David Nickerson
Columbia University, Yale University - Department of Political Science and University of Notre Dame

Abstract:

Loading...

GOTV, field experiment, randomization, voter turnout, voter mobilization, local elections

9.

Testing for Publication Bias in Political Science

Political Analysis, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 385-392, 2001
Posted: 19 Dec 2008
Alan Gerber, Donald P. Green and David Nickerson
Yale University - Department of Political Science, Columbia University and University of Notre Dame

Abstract:

Loading...

Publication bias, methodology, statistical significance, effect size, voter mobilization, field experiment