Andrew J. Wistrich

California Central District Court

Magistrate Judge

Los Angeles, CA 90012

United States

  • California Central District Court

SCHOLARLY PAPERS

19

DOWNLOADS
Rank 4,364

SSRN RANKINGS

Top 4,364

in Total Papers Downloads

18,360

TOTAL CITATIONS
Rank 6,035

SSRN RANKINGS

Top 6,035

in Total Papers Citations

234

Scholarly Papers (19)

Actions:
Email selected abstracts
1.

Implicit Bias in Judicial Decision Making How It Affects Judgment and What Judges Can Do About It

Chapter 5: American Bar Association, Enhancing Justice (2017), Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 17-16
Number of pages: 44 Posted: 20 Mar 2017 Last Revised: 05 May 2017
Andrew J. Wistrich and Jeffrey J. Rachlinski
California Central District Court and Cornell Law School
Downloads 4,333 (4,959)
Citation 1

Abstract:

Loading...

2.

Inside the Judicial Mind

Number of pages: 91 Posted: 23 Feb 2001
Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski and Andrew J. Wistrich
Vanderbilt University - Law School, Cornell Law School and California Central District Court
Downloads 3,786 (6,202)
Citation 116

Abstract:

Loading...

3.

Blinking on the Bench: How Judges Decide Cases

Cornell Law Review, Forthcoming, Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 07-25, Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 07-32
Number of pages: 42 Posted: 02 Nov 2007
Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski and Andrew J. Wistrich
Vanderbilt University - Law School, Cornell Law School and California Central District Court
Downloads 3,357 (7,545)
Citation 36

Abstract:

Loading...

behavioral law and economics, judges, heuristics and biases, dispute resolution, psychology, realism, formalism

4.

Does Unconscious Racial Bias Affect Trial Judges?

Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 84, No. 3, 2009, Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 09-11
Number of pages: 52 Posted: 08 Apr 2009
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, Sheri Lynn Johnson, Andrew J. Wistrich and Chris Guthrie
Cornell Law School, Cornell Law School, California Central District Court and Vanderbilt University - Law School
Downloads 2,414 (12,698)
Citation 18

Abstract:

Loading...

Judges, race

5.

Judging the Judiciary by the Numbers: Empirical Research on Judges

Downloads 987 (49,168)
Citation 21

Judging the Judiciary by the Numbers: Empirical Research on Judges

Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 2017. 13:X--X, doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085032 , Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 17-32
Number of pages: 45 Posted: 16 Jun 2017 Last Revised: 06 Jul 2017
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski and Andrew J. Wistrich
Cornell Law School and California Central District Court
Downloads 987 (48,389)
Citation 21

Abstract:

Loading...

Judges, Courts, Judicial Decision Making

Judging the Judiciary by the Numbers: Empirical Research on Judges

Annual Review of Law and Social Science, Vol. 13, pp. 203-229, 2017
Posted: 26 Oct 2017
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski and Andrew J. Wistrich
Cornell Law School and California Central District Court

Abstract:

Loading...

6.

Can Judges Ignore Inadmissible Information? The Difficulty of Deliberately Disregarding

Number of pages: 96 Posted: 04 Apr 2005
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, Andrew J. Wistrich and Chris Guthrie
Cornell Law School, California Central District Court and Vanderbilt University - Law School
Downloads 621 (90,911)
Citation 8

Abstract:

Loading...

7.

Judging Autonomous Vehicles

Yale Journal of Law and Technology (forthcoming)
Number of pages: 36 Posted: 17 Mar 2021 Last Revised: 22 Apr 2022
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski and Andrew J. Wistrich
Cornell Law School and California Central District Court
Downloads 484 (123,879)

Abstract:

Loading...

judges, courts, autonomous vehicles

8.

How Lawyers' Intuitions Prolong Litigation

Southern California Law Review, Vol. 86, No. 571, 2013, Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-91
Number of pages: 67 Posted: 18 Jul 2013 Last Revised: 19 Oct 2013
Andrew J. Wistrich and Jeffrey J. Rachlinski
California Central District Court and Cornell Law School
Downloads 463 (130,579)
Citation 2

Abstract:

Loading...

9.

The Hidden 'Judiciary': An Empirical Examination of Executive Branch Justice

Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 09-12, Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 09-09, Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-010
Number of pages: 56 Posted: 08 Apr 2009
Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski and Andrew J. Wistrich
Vanderbilt University - Law School, Cornell Law School and California Central District Court
Downloads 456 (133,015)
Citation 15

Abstract:

Loading...

Judges, ALI, Decision-making, Intuition, Deliberation, Heuristic and biases

10.

Probable Cause, Probability, and Hindsight

Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 11-25, Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 11-38
Number of pages: 27 Posted: 03 Jul 2011
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, Andrew J. Wistrich and Chris Guthrie
Cornell Law School, California Central District Court and Vanderbilt University - Law School
Downloads 399 (155,387)
Citation 1

Abstract:

Loading...

11.

Gains, Losses, and Judges: Framing and the Judiciary

Notre Dame Law Review, Vol. 94, No. 2, 2018, Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 19-43
Number of pages: 63 Posted: 18 Nov 2019
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski and Andrew J. Wistrich
Cornell Law School and California Central District Court
Downloads 200 (316,487)
Citation 5

Abstract:

Loading...

law and psychology, judging, loss aversion, reference-dependent choice, status quo bias, endowment effect, risk seeking in the face of losses, framing effects, empirical

12.

Benevolent Sexism in Judges

San Diego Law Review, Vol. 58, No. 101, 2021, Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper 21-32
Number of pages: 42 Posted: 26 May 2021 Last Revised: 15 Dec 2021
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski and Andrew J. Wistrich
Cornell Law School and California Central District Court
Downloads 191 (330,143)

Abstract:

Loading...

Judges, courts, gender, sexism

13.

Altering Attention in Adjudication

UCLA Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 1586, 2013, Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 13-32, Vanderbilt Public Law Research Paper No. 13-45
Number of pages: 34 Posted: 29 Sep 2013 Last Revised: 29 Oct 2013
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, Andrew J. Wistrich and Chris Guthrie
Cornell Law School, California Central District Court and Vanderbilt University - Law School
Downloads 183 (343,410)
Citation 3

Abstract:

Loading...

14.

Contrition in the Courtroom: Do Apologies Affect Adjudication?

Cornell Law Review, Vol. 98, No. 1189, 2013, Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-90
Number of pages: 57 Posted: 18 Jul 2013 Last Revised: 18 Oct 2013
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, Chris Guthrie and Andrew J. Wistrich
Cornell Law School, Vanderbilt University - Law School and California Central District Court
Downloads 173 (360,859)
Citation 8

Abstract:

Loading...

Judges

15.

Limitation of Legal Malpractice Actions: Defining Actual Injury and the Problem of Simultaneous Litigation

Southwestern University Law Review, Vol. 24, No. 1, 1994, Santa Clara Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 33-14
Number of pages: 81 Posted: 29 Jul 2014 Last Revised: 31 Jul 2014
Tyler Trent Ochoa and Andrew J. Wistrich
Santa Clara University School of Law and California Central District Court
Downloads 101 (551,968)

Abstract:

Loading...

16.

The Puzzling Purposes of Statutes of Limitation

Pacific Law Journal, Vol. 28, No. 3 (1997).
Number of pages: 62 Posted: 14 Nov 1997 Last Revised: 21 May 2018
Tyler Trent Ochoa and Andrew J. Wistrich
Santa Clara University School of Law and California Central District Court
Downloads 86 (611,213)

Abstract:

Loading...

17.

The Psychology of Persuasive Precedent

Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper Forthcoming
Number of pages: 29 Posted: 17 Jun 2024
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski and Andrew J. Wistrich
Cornell Law School and California Central District Court
Downloads 67 (701,440)

Abstract:

Loading...

18.

Unraveling the Tangled Web: Choosing the Proper Statute of Limitation for Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing

Southwestern University Law Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1997, Santa Clara Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 30-14
Number of pages: 57 Posted: 29 Jul 2014 Last Revised: 31 Jul 2014
Tyler Trent Ochoa and Andrew J. Wistrich
Santa Clara University School of Law and California Central District Court
Downloads 59 (747,199)

Abstract:

Loading...

19.

Can Judges Make Reliable Numeric Judgments? Distorted Damages and Skewed Sentences

Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 90, No. 2, 2015
Posted: 15 Mar 2017
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, Andrew J. Wistrich and Chris Guthrie
Cornell Law School, California Central District Court and Vanderbilt University - Law School

Abstract:

Loading...