Paul Marcus

William & Mary Law School

Haynes Professor of Law

South Henry Street

P.O. Box 8795

Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795

United States

  • William & Mary Law School

    • Email
    • Tel: 757-221-3900
    • Fax: 757-221-3261
SCHOLARLY PAPERS

26

DOWNLOADS
Rank 12,844

SSRN RANKINGS

Top 12,844

in Total Papers Downloads

3,986

SSRN CITATIONS
Rank 39,037

SSRN RANKINGS

Top 39,037

in Total Papers Citations

8

CROSSREF CITATIONS

8

Scholarly Papers (26)

Actions:
Email selected abstracts
1.

A Tale of Two (and Possibly Three) Atkins: Intellectual Disability and Capital Punishment Twelve Years after The Supreme Court's Creation of a Categorical Bar

William & Mary Bill of Rights, Vol. 23, 2014, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 9-294
Number of pages: 23 Posted: 16 Jan 2015 Last Revised: 21 Jan 2015
John H. Blume, Sheri Lynn Johnson, Paul Marcus and Emily C. Paavola
Cornell Law School, Cornell Law School, William & Mary Law School and Cornell Law School
Downloads 794 (32,591)

Abstract:

Loading...

Atkins, Intellectually Disabled Defendants, Capital Punishment

2.

Australia and the United States: Two Common Criminal Justice Systems Uncommonly at Odds

Downloads 649 ( 42,870)
Citation 2

Australia and the United States: Two Common Criminal Justice Systems Uncommonly at Odds

Number of pages: 92 Posted: 17 Dec 2003
Vicki C. Waye and Paul Marcus
University of South Australia - School of Law and William & Mary Law School
Downloads 491 (60,552)
Citation 2

Abstract:

Loading...

Comparative Criminal Procedure

Australia and the United States: Two Common Criminal Justice Systems Uncommonly at Odds

Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2004, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-79
Number of pages: 91 Posted: 04 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus and Vicki C. Waye
William & Mary Law School and University of South Australia - School of Law
Downloads 158 (200,881)

Abstract:

Loading...

evidence, interrogation, entrapment defense, Australia, United States, comparative law

3.

The Right to Counsel in Criminal Cases, A National Crisis

Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 57, No. 6, p. 1031, 2005-2006, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-92
Number of pages: 101 Posted: 29 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus and Mary Sue Backus
William & Mary Law School and University of Oklahoma College of Law
Downloads 349 (91,832)

Abstract:

Loading...

prosecute, criminal, defendant, plea, counsel, reform, indigent, and representation

4.

A Comparative Look at Plea Bargaining in Australia, Canada, England, New Zealand, and the United States.

William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 57, 2016
Number of pages: 79 Posted: 04 May 2016
Paul Marcus, Carol Brook, Bruno Fiannaca, David John Harvey, Jenny McEwan and Renee Pomerance
William & Mary Law School, Federal Defender Program for the Northern District of Illinois, Supreme Court of Western Australia, University of Auckland, University of Exeter and Ontario Superior Court of Justice
Downloads 249 (132,002)
Citation 1

Abstract:

Loading...

plea bargaining, comparative criminal procedure

5.

Judges Talking to Jurors in Criminal Cases: Why U.S. Judges Do it so Differently from Just About Everyone Else

Downloads 190 (170,730)

Judges Talking to Jurors in Criminal Cases: Why U.S. Judges Do it so Differently from Just About Everyone Else

Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2013, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-259
Number of pages: 64 Posted: 13 Sep 2013
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 124 (244,281)

Abstract:

Loading...

criminal procedure, comparative criminal justice, jury instructions

Judges Talking to Jurors in Criminal Cases: Why U.S. Judges Do It so Differently from Just About Everyone Else

Revista Forumul Judecatorilor, no.1, 2014
Number of pages: 44 Posted: 11 Sep 2014
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 66 (367,507)

Abstract:

Loading...

jurors, criminal cases, jury instructions, relation between judges and jurors, common-law

6.

Correcting Deadly Confusion: Responding to Jury Inquiries in Capital Cases

Downloads 178 (181,034)
Citation 1

Correcting Deadly Confusion: Responding to Jury Inquiries in Capital Cases

Number of pages: 63 Posted: 05 Jan 2000
Stephen P. Garvey, Sheri Lynn Johnson and Paul Marcus
Cornell Law School, Cornell Law School and William & Mary Law School
Downloads 131 (234,242)
Citation 2

Abstract:

Loading...

Correcting Deadly Confusion: Responding to Jury Inquiries in Capital Cases

Cornell Law Review, Vol. 85, No. 3, 1999-2000, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-81
Number of pages: 30 Posted: 04 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus, Stephen P. Garvey and Sheri Lynn Johnson
William & Mary Law School, Cornell Law School and Cornell Law School
Downloads 47 (433,104)

Abstract:

Loading...

Weeks, Angelone, capital, sentencing, jury, death, aggravating, fators, penality, mitigating, evidence, and instruction

Correcting Deadly Confusion: Responding to Jury Inquiries in Capital Cases

Cornell Law Review, Vol. 85, March 2000
Posted: 14 Apr 2000
Stephen P. Garvey, Sheri Lynn Johnson and Paul Marcus
Cornell Law School, Cornell Law School and William & Mary Law School

Abstract:

Loading...

7.

Australia and the United States: Two Common Criminal Justice Systems Uncommonly at Odds Part 2

Downloads 176 (182,879)

Australia and the United States: Two Common Criminal Justice Systems Uncommonly at Odds Part 2

Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2010, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-78
Number of pages: 68 Posted: 04 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus and Vicki C. Waye
William & Mary Law School and University of South Australia - School of Law
Downloads 176 (182,864)
Citation 1

Abstract:

Loading...

Australia, United States, common law, adversary, advocate, presumption, innocence, appeal, evidence, exclusion, interrogation, entrapment, defense, plea bargaining, double jeopardy, and punishment

Australia and the United States: Two Common Criminal Justice Systems, Uncommonly at Odds, Part 2

Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law, Forthcoming
Posted: 16 Nov 2009
Vicki C. Waye and Paul Marcus
University of South Australia - School of Law and William & Mary Law School

Abstract:

Loading...

8.

Conspiracy: The Criminal Agreement in Theory and in Practice

Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 65, No. 4, 1977, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-82
Number of pages: 46 Posted: 04 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 168 (190,335)

Abstract:

Loading...

conspiracy, doctrine, prosecution, court, and charge

9.

Criminal Conspiracy Law: Time to Turn Back from an Ever Expanding, Ever More Troubling Area

William & Mary Bill of Rights, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1992, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-77
Number of pages: 46 Posted: 01 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 144 (216,547)

Abstract:

Loading...

criminal, conspiracy, conspirator, evidence, punishment, and mega-trials

10.

The Due Process Defense in Entrapment Cases: The Journey Back

American Criminal Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 3, p. 457, 1990, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-89
Number of pages: 17 Posted: 24 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 138 (224,099)

Abstract:

Loading...

entrapment, defense, due process, criminals, defendant, government

11.

Capital Punishment in the United States and Beyond

Melbourne Univeristy Law Review, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2007, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-76
Number of pages: 37 Posted: 01 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 127 (239,037)

Abstract:

Loading...

capital, punishment, penalty, procedure, China, defendant, conviction

12.

Limiting Disclosure of Rape Victim’s Identities

Southern California Law Review, Vol. 64, No. 4, 1990-1991, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-84
Number of pages: 38 Posted: 19 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus and Tara L. McMahon
William & Mary Law School and affiliation not provided to SSRN
Downloads 121 (247,889)
Citation 1

Abstract:

Loading...

rape, sexual assult, impact, media, privacy, disclosure, victims, and First Amendment

13.

It’s Not Just About 'Miranda': Determining the Voluntariness of Confessions in Criminal Prosecutions

Valparaiso University Law Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2006, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-86
Number of pages: 45 Posted: 19 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 99 (285,456)
Citation 1

Abstract:

Loading...

Miranda, due process, interrogation, voluntary, totality, circumstances, deception, threat, age, intelligence

14.

Are Virginia Capital Jurors Any Different from the Rest?

William and Mary Law Review, Vol. 44, April 2003
Number of pages: 41 Posted: 14 Nov 2002
Stephen P. Garvey and Paul Marcus
Cornell Law School and William & Mary Law School
Downloads 82 (321,346)

Abstract:

Loading...

15.

Presenting, Back from the [Almost] Dead, the Entrapment Defense

Downloads 82 (321,346)

Presenting, Back from the [Almost] Dead, the Entrapment Defense

Florida Law Review, Vol. 47, No. 2, 1995, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-85
Number of pages: 42 Posted: 19 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 82 (324,294)

Abstract:

Loading...

induce, crime, conviction, predisposition, entrapment, defense, Sherman, Jacobson, government, threat

Presenting, Back from the [Almost] Dead, the Entrapment Defense

University of Florida Law Review, Vol. 47, No. 2 (1996).
Posted: 15 Oct 1996
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School

Abstract:

Loading...

16.

The Miranda Custody Requirement and Juveniles

Tennessee Law Review, Vol. 85, No. 253, 2018
Number of pages: 52 Posted: 25 May 2018
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 75 (338,539)

Abstract:

Loading...

Juveniles, Miranda, Custody, Interrogation, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure

17.

The Crime of Conspiracy Thrives in Decisions of the United States Supreme Court

Kansas Law Review, Vol. 64, 2015
Number of pages: 37 Posted: 24 Mar 2017
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 57 (390,588)

Abstract:

Loading...

criminal conspiracy

18.

Forum on Attorney’s Fees in Copyright Cases: Are We Running Through the Jungle Now or Is the Old Man Still Stuck Down the Road?

William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 39, No. 1, p. 65, 1997, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-88
Number of pages: 35 Posted: 24 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus and David Nimmer
William & Mary Law School and Irell & Manella LLP
Downloads 52 (407,334)

Abstract:

Loading...

copyright, infringement, attorney, fee, Fogerty, court

19.

Does Atkins Make A Difference in Non-Capital Cases? Should It?

William & Mary Bill of Rights, Vol. 23, 2014, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-293
Number of pages: 39 Posted: 16 Jan 2015
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 51 (410,742)

Abstract:

Loading...

Atkins, capital punishment, intellectually disabled defendants

20.

A Return to the 'Bright Line Rule' of Miranda

William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-90, William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 35, No. 1, 1993-1994
Number of pages: 55 Posted: 29 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 48 (421,632)

Abstract:

Loading...

Miranda, intent, Escobedo, bright line rule, interrogation, warnings, rights, protections, and waiver

21.

Why the United States Supreme Court Got Some [But Not a Lot] of the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel Analysis Right

St. Thomas Law Review, Vol. 21, No. 2, p. 142, 2009, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-91
Number of pages: 49 Posted: 29 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 47 (425,321)

Abstract:

Loading...

poor, indigent, Sixth Amendment, assistance, trial, lawyer, right, competency, counsel

22.

State Constitutional Protection for Defendants in Criminal Prosecutions

William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-80, Arizona State Law Journal, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1988
Number of pages: 30 Posted: 06 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 39 (457,227)

Abstract:

Loading...

defendants, criminal prosecutions, state constitutions, constitutional law, judge

23.

Re-Evaluating Large Multiple-Defendant Criminal Prosecutions

William & Mary Bill of Rights, Vol. 11, No. 1, p. 67, 2002, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-70
Number of pages: 57 Posted: 11 Feb 2011 Last Revised: 30 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 31 (493,617)

Abstract:

Loading...

multiple-defendants, criminal behavior, group activity, and prosecution

24.

The United States Supreme Court (Mostly) Gives Up Its Review Role with Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Cases

Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 100, 2016, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-353
Number of pages: 25 Posted: 28 Mar 2017
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 29 (504,002)

Abstract:

Loading...

Ineffective assistance of counsel

25.

The Right to Counsel in Criminal Cases: Still A National Crisis

George Washington Law Review, Vol. 86, No. 1564, 2018
Number of pages: 41 Posted: 25 Feb 2020
Paul Marcus and Mary Sue Backus
William & Mary Law School and University of Oklahoma College of Law
Downloads 11 (615,363)

Abstract:

Loading...

Prosecute, Criminal, Defendant, Plea, Counsel, Reform, Indigent, Representation

26.

Forum on Attorney's Fees in Copyright Infringement Cases: Are We Running Through the Jungle or is the Old Man Still Stuck Down the Road?

William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 39, No. 1 (1997).
Posted: 15 Sep 1997
David Nimmer and Paul Marcus
Irell & Manella LLP and William & Mary Law School

Abstract:

Loading...