Paul Marcus

William & Mary Law School

Haynes Professor of Law

South Henry Street

P.O. Box 8795

Williamsburg, VA 23187-8795

United States

SCHOLARLY PAPERS

22

DOWNLOADS
Rank 12,161

SSRN RANKINGS

Top 12,161

in Total Papers Downloads

3,036

CITATIONS
Rank 28,817

SSRN RANKINGS

Top 28,817

in Total Papers Citations

8

Scholarly Papers (22)

Australia and the United States: Two Common Criminal Justice Systems Uncommonly at Odds

Number of pages: 92 Posted: 17 Dec 2003
Vicki C. Waye and Paul Marcus
University of South Australia - School of Law and William & Mary Law School
Downloads 447 (48,830)

Abstract:

Comparative Criminal Procedure

Australia and the United States: Two Common Criminal Justice Systems Uncommonly at Odds

Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2004, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-79
Number of pages: 91 Posted: 04 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus and Vicki C. Waye
William & Mary Law School and University of South Australia - School of Law
Downloads 105 (206,247)

Abstract:

evidence, interrogation, entrapment defense, Australia, United States, comparative law

2.

A Tale of Two (and Possibly Three) Atkins: Intellectual Disability and Capital Punishment Twelve Years after The Supreme Court's Creation of a Categorical Bar

William & Mary Bill of Rights, Vol. 23, 2014, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 9-294
Number of pages: 23 Posted: 16 Jan 2015 Last Revised: 21 Jan 2015
Cornell Law School, Cornell Law School, William & Mary Law School and Cornell Law School
Downloads 265 (39,627)

Abstract:

Atkins, Intellectually Disabled Defendants, Capital Punishment

Judges Talking to Jurors in Criminal Cases: Why U.S. Judges Do it so Differently from Just About Everyone Else

Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2013, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-259
Number of pages: 64 Posted: 13 Sep 2013
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 119 (188,015)

Abstract:

criminal procedure, comparative criminal justice, jury instructions

Judges Talking to Jurors in Criminal Cases: Why U.S. Judges Do It so Differently from Just About Everyone Else

Revista Forumul Judecatorilor, no.1, 2014
Number of pages: 44 Posted: 11 Sep 2014
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 59 (293,370)

Abstract:

jurors, criminal cases, jury instructions, relation between judges and jurors, common-law

Correcting Deadly Confusion: Responding to Jury Inquiries in Capital Cases

Number of pages: 63 Posted: 05 Jan 2000
Cornell Law School, Cornell Law School and William & Mary Law School
Downloads 127 (178,762)
Citation 3

Abstract:

Correcting Deadly Confusion: Responding to Jury Inquiries in Capital Cases

Cornell Law Review, Vol. 85, No. 3, 1999-2000, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-81
Number of pages: 30 Posted: 04 Mar 2011
William & Mary Law School, Cornell Law School and Cornell Law School
Downloads 44 (336,458)
Citation 3

Abstract:

Weeks, Angelone, capital, sentencing, jury, death, aggravating, fators, penality, mitigating, evidence, and instruction

Correcting Deadly Confusion: Responding to Jury Inquiries in Capital Cases

Cornell Law Review, Vol. 85, March 2000
Posted: 14 Apr 2000
Cornell Law School, Cornell Law School and William & Mary Law School

Abstract:

5.

The Right to Counsel in Criminal Cases, A National Crisis

Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 57, No. 6, p. 1031, 2005-2006, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-92
Number of pages: 101 Posted: 29 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus and Mary Sue Backus
William & Mary Law School and University of Oklahoma College of Law
Downloads 148 (80,908)
Citation 3

Abstract:

prosecute, criminal, defendant, plea, counsel, reform, indigent, and representation

Australia and the United States: Two Common Criminal Justice Systems Uncommonly at Odds Part 2

Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2010, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-78
Number of pages: 68 Posted: 04 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus and Vicki C. Waye
William & Mary Law School and University of South Australia - School of Law
Downloads 141 (164,381)

Abstract:

Australia, United States, common law, adversary, advocate, presumption, innocence, appeal, evidence, exclusion, interrogation, entrapment, defense, plea bargaining, double jeopardy, and punishment

Australia and the United States: Two Common Criminal Justice Systems, Uncommonly at Odds, Part 2

Tulane Journal of International & Comparative Law, Forthcoming
Posted: 16 Nov 2009
Vicki C. Waye and Paul Marcus
University of South Australia - School of Law and William & Mary Law School

Abstract:

7.

Conspiracy: The Criminal Agreement in Theory and in Practice

Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 65, No. 4, 1977, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-82
Number of pages: 46 Posted: 04 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 122 (156,633)

Abstract:

conspiracy, doctrine, prosecution, court, and charge

8.

Criminal Conspiracy Law: Time to Turn Back from an Ever Expanding, Ever More Troubling Area

William & Mary Bill of Rights, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1992, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-77
Number of pages: 46 Posted: 01 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 96 (167,744)
Citation 1

Abstract:

criminal, conspiracy, conspirator, evidence, punishment, and mega-trials

9.

The Due Process Defense in Entrapment Cases: The Journey Back

American Criminal Law Review, Vol. 27, No. 3, p. 457, 1990, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-89
Number of pages: 17 Posted: 24 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 89 (189,601)

Abstract:

entrapment, defense, due process, criminals, defendant, government

10.

Limiting Disclosure of Rape Victim’s Identities

Southern California Law Review, Vol. 64, No. 4, 1990-1991, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-84
Number of pages: 38 Posted: 19 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus and Tara L. McMahon
William & Mary Law School and affiliation not provided to SSRN
Downloads 81 (210,807)

Abstract:

rape, sexual assult, impact, media, privacy, disclosure, victims, and First Amendment

11.

Are Virginia Capital Jurors Any Different From the Rest?

William and Mary Law Review, Vol. 44, April 2003
Number of pages: 41 Posted: 14 Nov 2002
Stephen P. Garvey and Paul Marcus
Cornell Law School and William & Mary Law School
Downloads 73 (248,668)

Abstract:

12.

It’s Not Just About 'Miranda': Determining the Voluntariness of Confessions in Criminal Prosecutions

Valparaiso University Law Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2006, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-86
Number of pages: 45 Posted: 19 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 66 (234,202)

Abstract:

Miranda, due process, interrogation, voluntary, totality, circumstances, deception, threat, age, intelligence

Presenting, Back from the [Almost] Dead, the Entrapment Defense

Florida Law Review, Vol. 47, No. 2, 1995, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-85
Number of pages: 42 Posted: 19 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 66 (276,492)
Citation 1

Abstract:

induce, crime, conviction, predisposition, entrapment, defense, Sherman, Jacobson, government, threat

Presenting, Back from the [Almost] Dead, the Entrapment Defense

University of Florida Law Review, Vol. 47, No. 2 (1996).
Posted: 15 Oct 1996
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School

Abstract:

14.

Capital Punishment in the United States and Beyond

Melbourne Univeristy Law Review, Vol. 31, No. 3, 2007, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-76
Number of pages: 37 Posted: 01 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 61 (239,433)

Abstract:

capital, punishment, penalty, procedure, China, defendant, conviction

15.

Forum on Attorney’s Fees in Copyright Cases: Are We Running Through the Jungle Now or Is the Old Man Still Stuck Down the Road?

William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 39, No. 1, p. 65, 1997, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-88
Number of pages: 35 Posted: 24 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus and David Nimmer
William & Mary Law School and Irell & Manella LLP
Downloads 40 (310,221)

Abstract:

copyright, infringement, attorney, fee, Fogerty, court

16.

Does Atkins Make A Difference in Non-Capital Cases? Should It?

William & Mary Bill of Rights, Vol. 23, 2014, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-293
Number of pages: 39 Posted: 16 Jan 2015
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 37 (330,425)

Abstract:

Atkins, capital punishment, intellectually disabled defendants

17.

Re-Evaluating Large Multiple-Defendant Criminal Prosecutions

William & Mary Bill of Rights, Vol. 11, No. 1, p. 67, 2002, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-70
Number of pages: 57 Posted: 11 Feb 2011 Last Revised: 30 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 25 (387,277)

Abstract:

multiple-defendants, criminal behavior, group activity, and prosecution

18.

A Return to the 'Bright Line Rule' of Miranda

William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-90, William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 35, No. 1, 1993-1994
Number of pages: 55 Posted: 29 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 24 (378,832)

Abstract:

Miranda, intent, Escobedo, bright line rule, interrogation, warnings, rights, protections, and waiver

19.

Why the United States Supreme Court Got Some [But Not a Lot] of the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel Analysis Right

St. Thomas Law Review, Vol. 21, No. 2, p. 142, 2009, William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-91
Number of pages: 49 Posted: 29 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 22 (363,583)

Abstract:

poor, indigent, Sixth Amendment, assistance, trial, lawyer, right, competency, counsel

20.

State Constitutional Protection for Defendants in Criminal Prosecutions

William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-80, Arizona State Law Journal, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1988
Number of pages: 30 Posted: 06 Mar 2011
Paul Marcus
William & Mary Law School
Downloads 20 (387,277)

Abstract:

defendants, criminal prosecutions, state constitutions, constitutional law, judge

21.

A Comparative Look at Plea Bargaining in Australia, Canada, England, New Zealand, and the United States.

William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 57, 2016
Number of pages: 79 Posted: 04 May 2016
William & Mary Law School, Federal Defender Program for the Northern District of Illinois, Supreme Court of Western Australia, University of Auckland, University of Exeter and Ontario Superior Court of Justice
Downloads 0 (167,744)

Abstract:

plea bargaining, comparative criminal procedure

22.

Forum on Attorney's Fees in Copyright Infringement Cases: Are We Running Through the Jungle or is the Old Man Still Stuck Down the Road?

William & Mary Law Review, Vol. 39, No. 1 (1997).
Posted: 15 Sep 1997
David Nimmer and Paul Marcus
Irell & Manella LLP and William & Mary Law School

Abstract: