Adelaide, South Australia 5005
Australia
University of Adelaide - School of Law
Legal education, first year experience, teaching, boot camp
Consent, Innovative treatment, Surgical innovation, Medical, Health care, Consent for medical treatment
advice prior to medical treatment, consent, innovative treatment, legal test, consent to innovative treatment
K10
Judicial Decision Making
Re: Carla (Medical Procedure), Re: Carla
decision-making, best interests, judicial process, withdrawl of treatment
Medical Law, Book Review Medical Law and Ethics
Best interests, Judicial process, Decision-making, Social media
Autonomy Stem cell therapies Multiple sclerosis
confidentiality, breach of duty, medical practitioner, PD, Nicholas Harvey
patient-centered ethics, communication, healthcare professionals
organ donation, antemortem, cardiac death, ethical justifications
post-mortem, organ donation, legal scholarship
discrimination, gamete donation
directed embryo donation, free choice, discrimination
born-alive rule, posession of sperm
medical law, embryo donation, organ donation
sale of sperm, health records, minimally conscious states, duties of candour
organ donation, discrimination after death, anti-vacination sentiments, tuberculosis management
community survey, embryo disposition, embryo donation, embryo status, embryo use, policy
descision of when a life can end
development of law, medical treatment
organs, after-death
professionalism, consent, organ donation, do not resuscitate
consent, capacity, infromation, treatment
mature minor, life-sustaining treatment, mootness, parental authority
investigating research, reproductive material, suicide
human tissue, property, negligence
Care Act, UK, Supporting Innovation
Medical innovation, health care (legal aspects)
decision-making, end of life, provision of pretreatment advice
surrogacy, legal duties, mental health
book review, Ethical, Judgments, Re-writing Medical Law
Humans, Diffusion of Innovation, Delivery of Health Care, Australia, Inventions
Innovative treatment, Consent, Vulnerable patients, Best interests, Quality of life
Professional Misconduct, Best Interests of a Child, Palliative Orders
THE BEST INTERESTS OF A CHILD, CAHS V Kiszko & Anor, [2016] FCWA 19, CAHS v Kiszko & Anor, [2016] FCWA 34, CAHS v Kiszko & Anor, [2016] FCWA 75
Parental responsibility, Best interests of the child, Invasive treatment, Gender, Brain death, End-of-life, Uniform Determination of Death Act, American Academy of Neurology
Kidney, Paired Donation, Valuable Consideration, Australia, Canada, United States
K00, K30, K32, K39
Device, representatives, hospitals, commercial imperatives, clinical decision-making
device representatives in hospitals, clinical decision-making
Euthanasia, Assisted dying, End of life, Withdrawal of nutrition, Court authority
Medical law, Embryo donation, Organ donation
