Francesco Contini

IRSIG-CNR

Via Zamboni, 26

Bologna, 40126

Italy

SCHOLARLY PAPERS

5

DOWNLOADS

536

SSRN CITATIONS
Rank 37,984

SSRN RANKINGS

Top 37,984

in Total Papers Citations

0

CROSSREF CITATIONS

16

Scholarly Papers (5)

1.

Reconciling Independence and Accountability in Judicial Systems

Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 26-43, December 2007
Number of pages: 18 Posted: 16 Jan 2008
Francesco Contini and Richard Mohr
IRSIG-CNR and University of Wollongong
Downloads 161 (193,894)

Abstract:

Loading...

judicial independence, judicial accountability, impartiality, court management, judicial reform

2.

Formula Over Function? From Algorithms to Values in Judicial Evaluation

Oñati Socio-Legal Series, Vol. 4, No. 5, 2014
Number of pages: 18 Posted: 24 Dec 2014
Francesco Contini, Richard Mohr and Marco Velicogna
IRSIG-CNR, University of Wollongong and IRSIG-CNR
Downloads 109 (262,619)

Abstract:

Loading...

Judicial evaluation, performance studies, management, Spanish Judiciary, Dutch Judiciary, Evaluación judicial, estudios de rendimiento, gestión, Poder Judicial Español, Poder Judicial Holandés

3.

Conflicts and Commonalities in Judicial Evaluation

Oñati Socio-Legal Series, Vol. 4, No. 5, 2014
Number of pages: 20 Posted: 24 Dec 2014
Richard Mohr and Francesco Contini
University of Wollongong and IRSIG-CNR
Downloads 103 (273,205)

Abstract:

Loading...

Judicial evaluation, performance studies, dialogue, values, Evaluación judicial, estudios de rendimiento, diálogo, valores

4.

Evaluating Judicial Performance: Editors’ Introduction

Oñati Socio-Legal Series, Vol. 4, No. 5, 2014
Number of pages: 7 Posted: 26 Dec 2014
Francesco Contini, Sharyn Roach Anleu and David Rottman
IRSIG-CNR, Flinders University - Department of Sociology and National Center for State Courts
Downloads 100 (278,874)

Abstract:

Loading...

Judicial performance evaluation, quality of judiciary, courts and judging, empirical research and courts, methodologies for judicial evaluation, performance studies, Evaluación del rendimiento judicial, calidad del sistema judicial, tribunales y hecho de juzgar, investigación empírica y tribunales

5.

How Many Cases? Assessing the Comparability of EU Judicial Datasets

Presented at the Conference Ius Dicere in a Globalized World XXIV Bi-Annual Colloquium of the Italian Association of Comparative Law (AIDC), Naples, 15-17 June 2017
Number of pages: 35 Posted: 22 Jun 2017
Elena Alina Ontanu, Marco Velicogna and Francesco Contini
Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Erasmus School of Law, IRSIG-CNR and IRSIG-CNR
Downloads 63 (365,768)

Abstract:

Loading...

EU Justice Scoreboard, CEPEJ, Evaluation of European Judicial Systems, Efficiency of Justice Systems