Francesco Contini

IRSIG-CNR

Via Zamboni, 26

Bologna, 40126

Italy

SCHOLARLY PAPERS

5

DOWNLOADS

509

SSRN CITATIONS

0

CROSSREF CITATIONS

16

Scholarly Papers (5)

1.

Reconciling Independence and Accountability in Judicial Systems

Utrecht Law Review, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 26-43, December 2007
Number of pages: 18 Posted: 16 Jan 2008
Francesco Contini and Richard Mohr
IRSIG-CNR and University of Wollongong
Downloads 160 (186,524)

Abstract:

Loading...

judicial independence, judicial accountability, impartiality, court management, judicial reform

2.

Formula Over Function? From Algorithms to Values in Judicial Evaluation

Oñati Socio-Legal Series, Vol. 4, No. 5, 2014
Number of pages: 18 Posted: 24 Dec 2014
Francesco Contini, Richard Mohr and Marco Velicogna
IRSIG-CNR, University of Wollongong and IRSIG-CNR
Downloads 101 (265,184)

Abstract:

Loading...

Judicial evaluation, performance studies, management, Spanish Judiciary, Dutch Judiciary, Evaluación judicial, estudios de rendimiento, gestión, Poder Judicial Español, Poder Judicial Holandés

3.

Evaluating Judicial Performance: Editors’ Introduction

Oñati Socio-Legal Series, Vol. 4, No. 5, 2014
Number of pages: 7 Posted: 26 Dec 2014
Francesco Contini, Sharyn Roach Anleu and David Rottman
IRSIG-CNR, Flinders University - Department of Sociology and National Center for State Courts
Downloads 96 (274,295)

Abstract:

Loading...

Judicial performance evaluation, quality of judiciary, courts and judging, empirical research and courts, methodologies for judicial evaluation, performance studies, Evaluación del rendimiento judicial, calidad del sistema judicial, tribunales y hecho de juzgar, investigación empírica y tribunales

4.

Conflicts and Commonalities in Judicial Evaluation

Oñati Socio-Legal Series, Vol. 4, No. 5, 2014
Number of pages: 20 Posted: 24 Dec 2014
Richard Mohr and Francesco Contini
University of Wollongong and IRSIG-CNR
Downloads 92 (281,827)

Abstract:

Loading...

Judicial evaluation, performance studies, dialogue, values, Evaluación judicial, estudios de rendimiento, diálogo, valores

5.

How Many Cases? Assessing the Comparability of EU Judicial Datasets

Presented at the Conference Ius Dicere in a Globalized World XXIV Bi-Annual Colloquium of the Italian Association of Comparative Law (AIDC), Naples, 15-17 June 2017
Number of pages: 35 Posted: 22 Jun 2017
Elena Alina Ontanu, Marco Velicogna and Francesco Contini
Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Erasmus School of Law, IRSIG-CNR and IRSIG-CNR
Downloads 60 (359,287)

Abstract:

Loading...

EU Justice Scoreboard, CEPEJ, Evaluation of European Judicial Systems, Efficiency of Justice Systems