Collusion and Combines in Canada, 1880–1890

20 Pages Posted: 6 Nov 2018

See all articles by Vincent Geloso

Vincent Geloso

George Mason University - Department of Economics

Date Written: November 6, 2018

Abstract

It is a little-known fact that Canada adopted its own antitrust laws one year before the landmark Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890. The Anti-Combines Act of 1889 was adopted after a decade in which ‘combines’ (the Canadian equivalent of ‘trusts’) grew more numerous. From their numbers, Canadian historians, legal scholars and economists inferred that consume welfare was hindered. However, price and output evidence has never been marshalled to provide even a first step towards assessing the veracity of this claim. This paper undertakes that task. I highlight that the output from industries accused of collusion increased faster than national output in the decade before the passage of the Act and that their prices accordingly fell faster than the national price index. I argue that these findings militate for the position that the origins of Canada’s Anti-Combines Act were rooted in rent-seeking processes similar to those that American scholars have found driving the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890.

Keywords: canadian economic history, competition policy, anti-combines act

JEL Classification: K21, L40, L51

Suggested Citation

Geloso, Vincent, Collusion and Combines in Canada, 1880–1890 (November 6, 2018). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3279262 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3279262

Vincent Geloso (Contact Author)

George Mason University - Department of Economics ( email )

4400 University Drive
Fairfax, VA 22030
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
60
Abstract Views
1,182
rank
436,542
PlumX Metrics