20 Pages Posted: 20 Jul 2007
This paper explores the possibility that a developing form of regulatory governance is also sketching out a new form of anticipatory regulatory democracy. 'Competitive supra-governmental regulation' is largely driven by non-state actors and is therefore commonly viewed as suffering a democracy deficit. However, because it stresses broad participation, intensive deliberative procedures, responsiveness to state law and widely accepted norms, and competition among regulatory programs to achieve effective implementation and widespread public acceptance, this form of regulation appears to stand up relatively well under generally understood criteria for democratic governance. Nonetheless, a more satisfactory evaluation will require a much better understanding of which programs win regulatory competitions, and why.
Keywords: anticipatory democracy, corporate social responsibility, democratic experimentalism, democratic governance, deliberative democracy, democracy, governance, international trade, new governance, private governance, private regulation, public participation, regulation, responsive law, self-governance
JEL Classification: K23, K32, L31, L33, N40, O31, P16, Q20, Q27, Q56
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Meidinger, Errol, Competitive Supra-Governmental Regulation: How Could it Be Democratic?. Buffalo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2007-007. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1001770 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1001770