Steel Safeguards and the Welfare of U.S. Steel Firms and Downstream Consumers of Steel: A Shareholder Wealth Perspective
31 Pages Posted: 20 Jul 2007
There are 2 versions of this paper
Steel Safeguards and the Welfare of U.S. Steel Firms and Downstream Consumers of Steel: A Shareholder Wealth Perspective
Abstract
This paper analyses the steel safeguards applied during 2001-3. Results reveal that for shareholders of U.S. steel companies safeguards generated positive 'abnormal' returns of approximately 6%. The cancellation of the safeguards resulted in wealth gains of about 5%. Steel shareholders experienced negative abnormal returns of -5% in response to the WTO ruling that the U.S. had violated WTO law. Our results are consistent with the neoclassical view that producers gain at the expense of consumers. Also, findings indicate that downstream-consuming firms that diversify production in NAFTA countries avert some trade policy risk associated with higher steel costs caused by safeguard protection.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you want regular updates from SSRN on Twitter?
Recommended Papers
-
Imports as a Cause of Injury: the Case of the U.S. Steel Industry
-
The Safeguards Mess: A Critique of WTO Jurisprudence
By Alan Sykes
-
Causing Problems? The WTO Review of Causation and Injury Attribution in U.S. Section 201 Cases
-
Are Imports to Blame?: Attribution of Injury Under the 1974 Trade Act
-
By Alan Sykes
-
One Lump or Two: Unitary Versus Bifurcated Measures of Injury at the Usitc
By Kenneth H. Kelly and Morris E. Morkre