Traditional Versus New-Keynesian Phillips Curves: Evidence from Output Effects

32 Pages Posted: 24 Jul 2007

See all articles by Bernhard Herz

Bernhard Herz

University of Bayreuth

Werner Roeger

European Commission, DGECFIN; European Commission

Date Written: October 2004

Abstract

The issue of the backward-looking versus the forward-looking Phillips curve is still an open question in the macroeconomics profession. We identify a crucial difference between the two hypotheses concerning the real output effects of monetary policy shocks. The backward-looking Phillips curve predicts a strict intertemporal trade-off in the case of monetary shocks: a positive short run response of output is followed by a period where output is below the baseline. The resulting cumulative output effect is exactly zero. In contrast, the forward-looking model implies that the cumulative output effect of temporary monetary shocks is positive. The empirical evidence on the cumulated output effects of money are consistent with the forward-looking model.

Keywords: Phillips curve, monetary neutrality, monetary policy

JEL Classification: E31, E32, E40

Suggested Citation

Herz, Bernhard and Roeger, Werner and Roeger, Werner, Traditional Versus New-Keynesian Phillips Curves: Evidence from Output Effects (October 2004). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1002503 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1002503

Bernhard Herz (Contact Author)

University of Bayreuth ( email )

Universitatsstr 30
Bayreuth, D-95447
Germany

Werner Roeger

European Commission ( email )

Economic and Financial Affairs
BU1-3/159, 200 Rue de la Loi
B-1049 Brussels
Belgium

European Commission, DGECFIN ( email )

Economic and Financial Affairs
BU1-3/159, 200 Rue de la Loi
B-1049 Brussels
Belgium

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
188
Abstract Views
1,380
Rank
292,923
PlumX Metrics