Prosecuting Government Fraud Despite the 'CSI Effect': Getting the Jury to Follow the Money

12 Pages Posted: 13 Feb 2008 Last revised: 6 Jan 2009

James B. Johnston

Seton Hall University - School of Law

Abstract

Prosecutors have complained that jurors who think they are educated in crime scene investigations by watching television have made it difficult to prove cases even when the charges are white collar in nature because they expect the forensics they see on the popular TV show CSI. Most episodes of CSI involve crimes that are violent and sometimes gruesome. However instead of using a gun or knife to prove the prosecution's case, government corruption trials must use dry and sometimes even dull financial evidence like bank records and government documents. No matter how complex a government fraud case may be each public corruption investigation and trial have the same common denominator. The prosecutor simply must get the jury to follow the money. For the prosecutor in a government fraud case, the challenge is to present the case in a simple, well organized fashion to show the jury how to follow the money. In the age of CSI it is not enough to instruct the jury to follow the money. The prosecutor must also show the jury how to follow the money.

Suggested Citation

Johnston, James B., Prosecuting Government Fraud Despite the 'CSI Effect': Getting the Jury to Follow the Money. New England Law Review, Vol. 41, 2007; Seton Hall Public Law Research Paper No. 1002589. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1002589

James B. Johnston (Contact Author)

Seton Hall University - School of Law ( email )

One Newark Center
Newark, NJ 07102-5210
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
172
Rank
142,410
Abstract Views
1,235