Prices, Spatial Competition and Heterogeneous Producers: An Empirical Test
26 Pages Posted: 26 Jul 2007
Abstract
Homogeneous-producer models attribute lower prices in denser markets solely to lower optimal markups. I argue here that when producers have different production costs, competition-driven selection on costs also reduces prices. This selection mechanism can be distinguished from the homogenous-producer case because it implies that higher density leads not only to lower average prices, but to declines in upper-bound prices and price dispersion as well. I find empirical support for this mechanism in the prices of ready-mixed concrete plants. I also show these findings do not simply reflect lower factor prices in dense markets, but result instead because dense-market producers are more efficient.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Firm Turnover in Imperfectly Competitive Markets
By Marcus Asplund and Volker Nocke
-
Prices, Spatial Competition, and Heterogenous Producers: An Empirical Test
-
Geographic Concentration and Establishment Size: Analysis in an Alternative Economic Geography Model
By John J. Stevens and Thomas J. Holmes
-
A Gap for Me: Entrepreneurs and Entry
By Volker Nocke
-
A Gap for Me: Entrepreneurs and Entry, Second Version
By Volker Nocke