Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Equal Sentences for Unequal Participation: Should the Eighth Amendment Allow All Juvenile Murder Accomplices to Receive Life Without Parole?

64 Pages Posted: 30 Jul 2007 Last revised: 18 Mar 2013

Brian Gallini

University of Arkansas - School of Law

Date Written: October 1, 2008

Abstract

No court has addressed the constitutional significance of sentencing juvenile murder accomplices who play a minimal role in the underlying killing to life in prison without parole. Indeed, no precedent makes clear whether it is cruel and unusual to impose that sentence on juvenile offenders convicted of first-degree murder pursuant to either the felony-murder doctrine or an accomplice theory of liability, notwithstanding their minimal involvement in the victim's death. To investigate this unanswered question, Part I of this Article explores the imposition of life without parole sentences on juvenile non-killers convicted of murder via either the felony-murder doctrine or accomplice liability. In doing so, Part I attempts to illustrate the problematic nature of imposing these sentences on less culpable juvenile non-killers convicted of first-degree murder by offering examples at the state and federal levels of defendants who received identical sentences yet played different roles in the victim's death.

Part II begins by outlining the evolution of the Supreme Court's interpretation of the Eighth Amendment's 'cruel and unusual' clause and continues by examining its application of the clause to juveniles. Part II concludes by evaluating the application by lower courts of the Supreme Court's Eighth Amendment jurisprudence to juvenile punishment.

Finally, Part III asserts that automatically sentencing juvenile non-killers to life in prison without parole renders lower courts unable either to individualize the juvenile's sentence or exercise judicial discretion in an effort to do so. Part III then argues that the Supreme Court's Eighth Amendment jurisprudence provides no remedy because it is ill-equipped to handle a juvenile non-killer's Eighth Amendment challenge to a sentence of life imprisonment without parole following a murder conviction obtained pursuant to a charge of felony-murder or accomplice liability. Taken together, Part III concludes, these deficiencies allow for further erosion of the ideals underlying juvenile punishment.

Keywords: Eighth Amendment, cruel and unusual punishment, juvenile, sentencing, indeterminate, constitution

Suggested Citation

Gallini, Brian, Equal Sentences for Unequal Participation: Should the Eighth Amendment Allow All Juvenile Murder Accomplices to Receive Life Without Parole? (October 1, 2008). Oregon Law Review, Vol. 87, No. 1, 2008. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1003449

Brian Gallini (Contact Author)

University of Arkansas - School of Law ( email )

260 Waterman Hall
Fayetteville, AR 72701
United States
479-575-6973 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://law.uark.edu/faculty-staff/faculty-biography.html?user=bgallini

Paper statistics

Downloads
220
Rank
116,931
Abstract Views
2,453