Why Don't Inventors Patent?
50 Pages Posted: 9 Aug 2007 Last revised: 30 Oct 2022
There are 2 versions of this paper
Innovation Without Patents - Evidence from the World Fairs
Date Written: August 2007
Abstract
This paper argues that the ability to keep innovations secret may be a key determinant of patenting. To test this hypothesis, the paper examines a newly-collected data set of more than 7,000 American and British innovations at four world's fairs between 1851 and 1915. Exhibition data show that the industry where an innovation is made is the single most important determinant of patenting. Urbanization, high innovative quality, and low costs of patenting also encourage patenting, but these influences are small compared with industry effects. If the effectiveness of secrecy is an important factor in inventors' patenting decisions, scientific breakthroughs, which facilitate reverse-engineering, should increase inventors' propensity to patent. The discovery of the periodic table in 1869 offers an opportunity to test this idea. Exhibition data show that patenting rates for chemical innovations increased substantially after the introduction of the periodic table, both over time and relative to other industries.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
150 Years of Patent Protection
By Josh Lerner
-
150 Years of Patent Protection
By Josh Lerner
-
Patent Protection and Innovation Over 150 Years
By Josh Lerner
-
150 Years of Patent Office Practice
By Josh Lerner
-
150 Years of Patent Office Practice
By Josh Lerner
-
How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence from Nineteenth-Century World Fairs
By Petra Moser
-
How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation?
By Petra Moser
-
By Lee Branstetter, Raymond J. Fisman, ...
-
By Lee Branstetter, Raymond J. Fisman, ...
-
Innovation Without Patents - Evidence from the World Fairs
By Petra Moser