Racial Blindsight: The Absurdity of Color-Blind Criminal Justice

21 Pages Posted: 12 Aug 2007

See all articles by Andrew E. Taslitz

Andrew E. Taslitz

American University - Washington College of Law

Abstract

There is a phenomenon known as blindsight in which a supposedly blind person accurately answers questions about what he insists he cannot see. Blindsight can have physical causes, beyond the sufferer's control, and psychological causes. In the latter situation blindness is, in a sense, chosen. This article uses the blindsight phenomenon as a metaphor for understanding one role of race in the criminal justice system: a form of subconscious bias, a truthful insistence by many of the actors in the system that they see no injustice when, in fact, they do. The article explores the temporal component of racial blindsight too, examining hindsight, now-sight, foresight, and faux-sight. The article offers illustrations involving racial impact statements, anti-integrationist violence, facial profiling, and lower court resistance to modestly progressive death penalty decisions concerning race by the United States Supreme Court. This brief piece serves as an introduction to a symposium on race and criminal justice for which the author has served as editor.

Keywords: blind, blindsight, sight, race, racial bias, subconscious bias, discrimination, Einstein, hate crimes, integration, facial profiling, racial profiling, death penalty, racial impact, racial impact statements

JEL Classification: K14, K41

Suggested Citation

Taslitz, Andrew E., Racial Blindsight: The Absurdity of Color-Blind Criminal Justice. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1005764

Andrew E. Taslitz (Contact Author)

American University - Washington College of Law ( email )

4300 Nebraska Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20016
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
143
Abstract Views
1,494
rank
240,112
PlumX Metrics