Designing Central Bank Loss Functions
International Journal of Business and Economics, Aprill 2010
5 Pages Posted: 11 Aug 2007 Last revised: 26 Dec 2010
Date Written: February 15, 2010
Abstract
Kydland and Prescott (1977) show that optimal policy proves inconsistent because of rational expectations. This paper shows that the inconsistency of optimal policy comes from the inconsistency of the social loss function with the economic structure. As a result, we delegate to the central bank a different loss function, which is consistent with the economic structure. Under the delegated loss function, consistent policy proves optimal for the social welfare. We interpret the delegated central bank loss function as an intermediate objective (an institutional mechanism) and the social loss function as the ultimate objective. The ultimate objective is optimized through the institutional mechanism.
Keywords: optimal policy, consistent policy, time inconsistency
JEL Classification: E42, E52, E58
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Monetary Policy Rules and Macroeconomic Stability: Evidence and Some Theory
By Richard Clarida, Jordi Galí, ...
-
The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective
By Richard Clarida, Jordi Galí, ...
-
The Science of Monetary Policy: a New Keynesian Perspective
By Richard Clarida, Jordi Galí, ...
-
An Optimization-Based Econometric Framework for the Evaluation of Monetary Policy: Expanded Version
-
Monetary Policy Rules in Practice: Some International Evidence
By Richard Clarida, Jordi Galí, ...
-
Inflation Forecast Targeting: Implementing and Monitoring Inflation Targets