Procedural Path Dependence: Discrimination and the Civil-Criminal Divide

57 Pages Posted: 19 Aug 2007 Last revised: 21 Sep 2008

See all articles by Julie C. Suk

Julie C. Suk

Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law; University of California, Berkeley - Berkeley Center on Comparative Equality & Anti-Discrimination Law; CUNY - The Graduate Center

Abstract

Procedural path dependence occurs when the particular features of the procedural system which has been charged with enforcing a given legal norm determine the substantive path of that legal norm. This article shows how the limits of employment discrimination law in two different national contexts can be explained by procedural dynamics. In France, as in several European countries, employment discrimination law is enforced predominantly in criminal proceedings. French criminal procedure enables the discovery of information necessary to proving the facts of discrimination, whereas the limited nature of French civil procedure makes it impossible for such information to be revealed. As a result, the substantive legal norm of nondiscrimination is being developed in French criminal law, to which the element of intent and defendant's strong presumption of innocence are essential. In the United States, liberal civil procedure rules permit the broad discovery of information relevant to proving discrimination. At the same time, the civil litigation system has undermined the law's adaptability to the evolving social practices that threaten equal employment opportunity. The civil dimension of this procedural system, deeply rooted in the paradigm of the private damages action, tends to favor the employment discrimination claims that most closely resemble torts, thereby limiting the law's ability to address the complex causes of unequal employment opportunity. This, too, is an example of procedural path dependence. These examples reveal that discrimination is neither criminal nor civil in nature. To overcome its present limits, antidiscrimination law must transcend the substantive principles that have become entrenched by the procedural systems in which it developed.

Keywords: procedure, comparative law, discrimination, civil-criminal divide

Suggested Citation

Suk, Julie C., Procedural Path Dependence: Discrimination and the Civil-Criminal Divide. Washington University Law Review, Vol. 85, No. 6, 2008. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1006759 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1006759

Julie C. Suk (Contact Author)

Yeshiva University - Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law ( email )

55 Fifth Ave.
New York, NY 10003
United States

University of California, Berkeley - Berkeley Center on Comparative Equality & Anti-Discrimination Law

Boalt Hall
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States

CUNY - The Graduate Center ( email )

365 Fifth Avenue
5th Floor
New York, NY 10016-4309
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
169
Abstract Views
1,501
rank
189,166
PlumX Metrics