Too Little or Too Much? Reexamining the Relationship between Corporate Giving and Corporate Financial Performance
Hong Kong University of Science & Technology Business School Research Paper
Academy of Management Best Conference Paper SIM: G1, 2005
7 Pages Posted: 15 Aug 2007
Abstract
How do corporate charitable contributions affect corporate financial performance? Instrumental stakeholder theory posits that corporate giving can lead to high levels of corporate financial performance through improved stakeholder relations. In contrast, agency theory suggests that corporate giving diverts valuable corporate resources and inhibits corporate financial performance. Extant empirical studies that have examined the relationship found inconclusive results. We depart from and extend the existing literature in two main aspects. First, building upon the instrumental stakeholder argument and agency perspective, we develop the argument that there is an inverse U-shaped relationship between corporate charitable giving and corporate financial performance. Second, we predict that the inverse U-shaped relationship changes over time: firms that engage in moderate amounts of giving in a later period would have a higher level of financial performance than those in an earlier period. The hypotheses are tested with a longitudinal data set of corporate giving from 1984 to 1999, providing strong support for our predictions.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
How Well Do Social Ratings Actually Measure Corporate Social Responsibility?
By Aaron Chatterji, David I. Levine, ...
-
Is Doing Good Good for You? How Corporate Charitable Contributions Enhance Revenue Growth
By Baruch Lev, Christine Petrovits, ...
-
Is Doing Good Good for You? Yes, Charitable Contributions Enhance Revenue Growth
By Baruch Lev and Christine Petrovits
-
Is Doing Good Good for You? Yes, Charitable Contributions Enhance Revenue Growth
By Baruch Lev
-
How Firms Respond to Being Rated
By Aaron Chatterji and Michael W. Toffel
-
Intentional Action and Side Effects in Ordinary Language
By Joshua Knobe