East Asia is Not Mexico: The Difference between Balance of Payments Crises and Debt Deflations

Levy Economics Institute Working Paper No. 235

24 Pages Posted: 29 Sep 1998

See all articles by Jan A. Kregel

Jan A. Kregel

Bard College - The Levy Economics Institute

Date Written: May 1998


What was different about the collapse of the Asian emerging markets in 1997? The free fall of the Mexican peso and the collapse of the Mexican Bolsa produced a "Tequila effect" that spread through most of South America but did not create a sell off in the global financial markets similar to that which occurred in 27 October 1997. Normally, sharp declines in prices in emerging equity markets produce a "flight to quality," in which international investors shift their funds back into developed country markets and local investors seek to protect their wealth by diversifying into developed country assets. Yet, the collapse in the Asian emerging markets, that started in Thailand, spread to the other second-tier Newly Industrialising Economies (NIEs) and eventually extended to the first-tier. NIEs produced the largest absolute declines ever experienced in the major developed country equity markets. If equity markets can suffer from what Alan Greenspan has called "irrational exuberance," the Asian crisis suggests that they may also suffer from "irrational pessimism." Yet, there is much to indicate that in this case the financial markets in Japan, Europe and the U.S. were quite rational in assessing the global implications of the financial crisis in Asia.

The developing countries in Asia have come to play a crucial role in global growth. In the 1990s, they accounted for roughly half of global expansion. The immediate implication of the Asian crises is that the collapse of growth in the region would produce a global deflation. This would make it more difficult for developed economies, particularly Europe and Japan, to expand at rates necessary to generate sufficient investment to produce reductions in unemployment. Recovery in the developed world outside the U.S. and the U.K. is thus at risk as a result of declining Asian growth. Indeed, if the U.S. cannot continue its current expansion, there is a clear risk of a global depression similar to that of the 1930s.

JEL Classification: F31, F34, O16

Suggested Citation

Kregel, Jan A., East Asia is Not Mexico: The Difference between Balance of Payments Crises and Debt Deflations (May 1998). Levy Economics Institute Working Paper No. 235, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=100788 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.100788

Jan A. Kregel (Contact Author)

Bard College - The Levy Economics Institute ( email )

Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504
United States
845-758-7700 (Phone)
845-758-1149 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics