Patience as a Political Virtue: Delayed Gratification and Turnout
Political Behavior, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 113-128, June 2006
25 Pages Posted: 20 Aug 2007
Abstract
A number of scholars have demonstrated that voter turnout is influenced by the costs of processing information and going to the polls, and the policy benefits associated with the outcome of the election. However, no one has yet noted that the costs of voting are paid on and before Election Day while policy benefits may not materialize until several days, months, or even years later. Since the costs of voting must be borne before the benefits are realized, people who are more patient should be more willing to vote. We use a "choice game" from experimental economics to estimate individual discount factors which are used to measure patience. We then show that patience significantly increases voter turnout.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Predictably Incoherent Judgments
By Cass R. Sunstein, Daniel Kahneman, ...
-
Tom Sawyer and the Construction of Value
By Dan Ariely, George Loewenstein, ...
-
Jurors are Competent Cue-Takers: How Institutions Substitute for Legal Sophistication
-
Nothing But the Truth? Experiments on Adversarial Competition, Expert Testimony, and Decision Making
-
Making Citizens Smart: When Do Institutions Improve Unsophisticated Citizens' Decisions?
-
The Blind Leading the Blind: Who Gets Polling Information and Does it Improve Decisions?
-
Indignation: Psychology, Politics, Law
By Daniel Kahneman and Cass R. Sunstein
-
Competition in the Courtroom: When Does Expert Testimony Improve Jurors' Decisions?