HKIMR Working Paper No. 9/2004
45 Pages Posted: 23 Aug 2007 Last revised: 28 Jul 2009
Date Written: May 1, 2004
We examine a sample of 328 filings of "connected transactions" between Hong Kong listed companies and their controlling shareholders during 1998-2000. We address three questions: What types of connected transactions are likely to lead to expropriation of minority shareholders? Which firms are more likely to expropriate? Does the market anticipate the expropriation? On average, firms earn significant negative excess returns both around the initial announcement of the connected transactions (from -2.5 per cent for firms making cash payments to directors to -5.9 per cent for firms selling equity stakes to their controlling shareholders) and during the 12-month period following the announcement (from -7.2 per cent for firms acquiring assets from their substantial shareholders to -21.9 per cent for firms selling assets to them). Excess returns are significantly negatively related to percentage ownership by the controlling shareholder. They are also significantly negatively related to proxies for information disclosure. The likelihood of undertaking connected transactions is higher for firms whose ultimate owners can be traced to mainland China. Finally, we find limited evidence that the market anticipates the expropriation by discounting firms that undertake connected transactions.
Keywords: International corporate governance, Legal systems, Expropriation, Connected transactions, Pyramids, Tunneling, Propping
JEL Classification: G15, G34, K33
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Cheung, Stephen Yan-Leung and Rau, P. Raghavendra and Stouraitis, Aris, Tunneling, Propping, and Expropriation: Evidence from Connected Party Transactions in Hong Kong (May 1, 2004). HKIMR Working Paper No. 9/2004; EFA 2004 MAASTRICHT Conference Paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1008780 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1008780