Comparing the Pre-Settlement Risk Implications of Alternative Clearing Arrangements
37 Pages Posted: 22 Aug 2007
Date Written: April 2007
Abstract
In recent years, there has been a marked expansion in the range of products cleared through central counterparty clearing houses, accompanied by a trend towards consolidation in the clearing infrastructure. The financial stability implications of these developments are of considerable policy interest. In this paper, we use a simulation approach to analyse, in a systematic way, the potential pre-settlement cost and risk implications of these developments. Our results point towards substantial risk-reduction benefits from multilateral clearing arrangements, arising from multilateral netting and mutualisation. The paper also examines individual incentives to join multilateral clearing arrangements. We suggest that arrangements with restricted direct participation and tiered membership may be a natural response to the uneven distribution of total pre-settlement costs when agents are of heterogeneous credit quality and it is costly to individually tailor margin.
Keywords: Clearing, netting, financial stability, central counterparty
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Does a Central Clearing Counterparty Reduce Counterparty Risk?
By Darrell Duffie and Haoxiang Zhu
-
Credit Default Swaps and the Empty Creditor Problem
By Patrick Bolton and Martin Oehmke
-
The Bear's Lair: Indexed Credit Default Swaps and the Subprime Mortgage Crisis
By Richard Stanton and Nancy Wallace
-
One Share-One Vote is Unenforceable and Sub-Optimal
By Avner Kalay and Shagun Pant