Strategic Judicial Decision Making
22 Pages Posted: 24 Aug 2007 Last revised: 26 Nov 2022
Date Written: August 2007
Abstract
This survey paper starts from the basic, and intuitive, assumption that judges are human and as such, can be modeled in the same fashion we model politicians, activists, managers: driven by well-defined preferences, behaving in a purposive and forward-looking fashion. We explore, then, the role politics play in judicial decision-making. We provide a brief overview of what is called the "strategic approach," compare it to alternative approaches to understand judicial behavior, and offer some concluding thoughts about the future of positive analyses of judicial decision-making.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Case for Managed Judges: Learning from Japan after the Political Upheaval of 1993
-
The Industrial Organization of the Japanese Bar: Levels and Determinants of Attorney Incomes
By Minoru Nakazato, J. Mark Ramseyer, ...
-
By Vicki Schultz and Stephen Petterson
-
Congress and the Political Expansion of the United States District Courts
By John M. De Figueiredo, Gerald S. Gryski, ...
-
The Supreme Court and the Dig: An Empirical and Institutional Analysis
By Michael Solimine and Rafael Gely
-
The Japanese Judiciary: Maintaining Integrity, Autonomy and the Public Trust
-
By Tonja Jacobi
-
Medical Error as Reportable Event, as Tort, as Crime: A Transpacific Comparison
By Robert B Leflar and Futoshi Iwata
-
The Anatomy of a Conservative Court: Judicial Review in Japan
By David S. Law