How Important is Money in the Conduct of Monetary Policy?

53 Pages Posted: 24 Aug 2007 Last revised: 30 Nov 2022

See all articles by Michael Woodford

Michael Woodford

Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: August 2007

Abstract

I consider some of the leading arguments for assigning an important role to tracking the growth of monetary aggregates when making decisions about monetary policy. First, I consider whether ignoring money means returning to the conceptual framework that allowed the high inflation of the 1970s. Second, I consider whether models of inflation determination with no role for money are incomplete, or inconsistent with elementary economic principles. Third, I consider the implications for monetary policy strategy of the empirical evidence for a long-run relationship between money growth and inflation. And fourth, I consider reasons why a monetary policy strategy based solely on short-run inflation forecasts derived from a Phillips curve may not be a reliable way of controlling inflation. I argue that none of these considerations provides a compelling reason to assign a prominent role to monetary aggregates in the conduct of monetary policy.

Suggested Citation

Woodford, Michael, How Important is Money in the Conduct of Monetary Policy? (August 2007). NBER Working Paper No. w13325, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1008819

Michael Woodford (Contact Author)

Columbia University, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Economics ( email )

420 W. 118th Street
New York, NY 10027
United States