Predicting the Cost of Environmental Management System Adoption: The Role of Capabilities, Resources and Ownership Structure
Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 301-320, 2006
20 Pages Posted: 27 Aug 2007
Abstract
This research explores why some facilities accrue greater costs when adopting an environmental management system (EMS) and why costs vary among three different ownership structures. Using survey data of organizations that documented their EMS adoption costs over a three-year period, the results show that publicly traded facilities had stronger complementary capabilities prior to EMS adoption and therefore lower adoption costs. By contrast, government facilities and privately owned enterprises had fewer capabilities and accrued higher EMS adoption costs. The development of organizational capabilities and resources therefore appears to be a function of both organizational exploitation of imperfect or incomplete market factors, and the institutional context of these decisions.
JEL Classification: L21, L60, M14, L33
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Organizational Responses to Environmental Demands: Opening the Black Box
-
By Joann Carmin, Nicole Darnall, ...
-
Iso 14001: Greening Management Systems
By Nicole Darnall, Deborah Rigling Gallagher, ...
-
Greener and Cleaner? The Signaling Accuracy of U.S. Voluntary Environmental Programs
By Nicole Darnall and Joann Carmin
-
By Jorge E. Rivera and Peter De Leon
-
Is Greener Whiter Yet? The Sustainable Slopes Program after Five Years
By Jorge E. Rivera, Peter De Leon, ...
-
Assessing the Performance of Voluntary Environmental Programs: Does Certification Matter?
By Nicole Darnall and Stephen Sides