Income and Vote Choice in the 2000 Mexican Presidential Election
14 Pages Posted: 4 Sep 2007
Date Written: July 13, 2006
Abstract
Using multilevel modeling of state-level economic data and individual-level exit poll data from the 2000 Mexican presidential election, we find that income has a stronger effect in predicting the vote for the conservative party in poorer states than in richer states - a pattern that has also been found in recent U.S. elections. In addition (and unlike in the U.S.), richer states on average tend to support the conservative party at higher rates than poorer states. Our findings are consistent with the 2006 Mexican election, which showed a profound divide between rich and poor states. Income is an important predictor of the vote both at the individual and the state levels.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Political Polarization and Income Inequality
By Nolan Mccarty, Keith T. Poole, ...
-
Rich State, Poor State, Red State, Blue State: What's the Matter with Connecticut?
By Andrew Gelman, Boris Shor, ...
-
A Bayesian Multilevel Modeling Approach to Time-Series Cross-Sectional Data
By Boris Shor, Joseph Bafumi, ...
-
Partisans Without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion
By Delia Baldassarri and Andrew Gelman
-
Fitting Multilevel Models When Predictors and Group Effects Correlate
By Joseph Bafumi and Andrew Gelman
-
United We Divide?: Education, Income, and Heterogeneity in Mass Partisan Polarization
-
Economic Trends and Judicial Outcomes: A Macrotheory of the Court
By Thomas J. Brennan, Lee Epstein, ...
-
Poisson Games, Strategic Candidacy, and Duverger's Law
By Yuelan Chen