How I Decide Depends on What I Spend: Use of Heuristics is Greater for Time than for Money
29 Pages Posted: 2 Sep 2007
Abstract
We demonstrate that decision making is more heuristic in situations that involve spending time rather than money. Relative to participants in the money condition, those in the time condition show a higher propensity to choose a compromise option (experiment 1), and rely on an arbitrary anchor (experiment 2). We propose that such heuristics are used more in time because, compared to monetary expenditures, temporal expenditures are harder to account for. Consistent with this proposition, when participants in both time and money conditions are primed to account for their expenditures, they no longer differ in their use of heuristics. The associated response times offer additional process evidence (experiment 3).
Keywords: Time and Money, Information Search, Judgment and Decision Making, BDT, Consumer Psychology, Compromise Effect, Anchoring
JEL Classification: M3, D8, C91
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
On the Depth and Dynamics of Online Search Behavior
By Eric J. Johnson, Wendy W. Moe, ...
-
Resource Slack and Propensity to Discount Delayed Investments of Time Versus Money
By Gal Zauberman and John G. Lynch
-
Cognitive Lock-In and the Power Law of Practice
By Eric J. Johnson, Steven Bellman, ...
-
By Selin A. Malkoc and Gal Zauberman
-
Explaining Cognitive Lock-In: The Role of Skill-Based Habits of Use in Consumer Choice
By Kyle B. Murray and Gerald Häubl
-
Consuming Now or Later? The Interactive Effect of Timing and Attribute Alignability
By Selin A. Malkoc, Gal Zauberman, ...
-
The Best of Strangers: Context Dependent Willingness to Divulge Personal Information
By Leslie K. John, Alessandro Acquisti, ...
-
Skill Acquisition and Interface Loyalty: A Human Capital Perspective
By Kyle B. Murray and Gerald Häubl
-
Superstition and Rational Learning
By Drew Fudenberg and David K. Levine