Black Market Capital
97 Pages Posted: 11 Sep 2007 Last revised: 24 Jul 2008
Abstract
Hedge funds and private equity offer unique investing opportunities, including the possibility for diversified and excess returns. Yet, current federal securities regulation effectively prohibits the public offer and purchase in the United States of these hedge fund and private equity investments. Public investors, foreclosed from purchasing hedge funds and private equity, instead seek to replicate their benefits. This demand drives public investors to substitute less-suitable, publicly available investments which attempt to mimic the characteristics of hedge funds or private equity. This effect, which this Article terms black market capital, is an economic spur for a number of recent capital markets phenomena, including fund adviser IPOs, special purpose acquisition companies, business development companies and specialized exchange traded funds all of which largely attempt to replicate private equity or hedge fund returns and have been marketed to public investors on this basis. Black market capital has not only altered the structure of the U.S. capital market but has shifted capital flows to foreign markets and engendered the creation of U.S. private markets. This Article identifies and examines the ramifications of black market capital. It finds this effect to be an irrational by-product of current hedge fund and private equity regulation, one likely harmful to U.S. capital markets. These are external costs inherent in the current regulatory scheme which the SEC has not recognized. The SEC should consequently undertake a thorough cost-benefit analysis of its hedge fund and private equity regulation. Based on the available evidence, such an analysis is likely to conclude that the benefits of a regulatory scheme permitting the public offer of hedge funds and private equity funds not only exceed its costs but is superior to current regulation. Black market capital is also an example of the unintended effects of regulating under the precautionary principle and difficulty of regulating in an era of market proliferation.
Keywords: Hedge Funds, Private Equity, SEC, Investment Company Act, Investment Advisers Act, special purpose acquisition companies, business development companies, administrative law, market regulation
JEL Classification: G18, G28, G30, K22, L51, N20
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Financing Under Extreme Risk: Contract Terms and Returns to Private Investments in Public Equity
By Susan Chaplinsky and David Haushalter
-
Does Investor Identity Matter in Equity Issues? Evidence from Private Placements
By Srinivasan Krishnamurthy, Paul A. Spindt, ...
-
By Na Dai
-
The Choice of Equity Selling Mechanisms: PIPES versus SEOS
By Hsuan‐chi Chen, Na Dai, ...
-
The Quality and Price of Investment Banks' Service: Evidence from the PIPE Market
-
By Kimberly C. Gleason, Ravi Jain, ...
-
By Karen H. Wruck and Yilin Wu
-
By Ioannis V. Floros and Kuldeep Shastri