60 Pages Posted: 8 Sep 2007
Date Written: August 31, 2007
SFAS 142 requires firms to use fair-value estimates to determine goodwill impairments. Watts (2003) and Ramanna (2007) argue the unverifiable nature of those fair-value estimates gives firms discretion to manage impairments. We test this argument in a sample of firms with market indications of impairment (firms with book goodwill and market-to-book ratio below one). We find that the frequency of non-impairment in this sample is about 71%, and that non-impairment is increasing in financial characteristics predicted to be associated with greater unverifiable fair-value-based discretion. To investigate whether non-impairment is associated with managers producing on average better estimates of goodwill than the market, we test whether non-impairment increases in industries with higher average information asymmetries. We fail to find evidence consistent with this proposition.
Keywords: goodwill impairment, fair-value accounting, SFAS 142
JEL Classification: M41, M43, M44, G38, K22
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Ramanna, Karthik and Watts, Ross L., Evidence on the Effects of Unverifiable Fair-Value Accounting (August 31, 2007). Harvard Business School Working Paper No. 08-014. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1012139 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1012139