Footnotes (298)



Economic Substance and the Supreme Court

Andy Grewal

University of Iowa - College of Law

Tax Notes, Vol. 116, No. 11, 2007

The Supreme Court grants certiorari in a wide variety of fascinating cases. Occasionally, it agrees to decide tax cases, too.

Perhaps because of the perceived dryness of tax law, the Court has been hesitant to address the validity of the so-called economic substance doctrine. Although there are too many formulations of the doctrine to count, the lower courts often hold that even when a taxpayer has met a statute's requirements, he cannot enjoy any of its benefits unless his conduct reveals a business purpose and a reasonable expectation of profit.

This article argues that the lower courts' application of an extrastatutory economic substance doctrine cannot be reconciled with the Supreme Court cases that purportedly gave birth to that doctrine.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: intentionalism, supreme court, economic substance doctrine, tax shelters, tax, statutory interpretation, purposivism, textualism, Coltec, Gregory, Knetsch, economic substance, sham transaction doctrine, substance over form doctrine, business purpose doctrine, LILO, Son of Boss

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: September 12, 2007 ; Last revised: January 26, 2015

Suggested Citation

Grewal, Andy, Economic Substance and the Supreme Court. Tax Notes, Vol. 116, No. 11, 2007. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1013388

Contact Information

Amandeep S. Grewal (Contact Author)
University of Iowa - College of Law ( email )
Melrose and Byington
Iowa City, IA 52242
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,195
Downloads: 366
Download Rank: 60,167
Footnotes:  298