Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

The Dilemma of the Criminal Defendant With a Prior Record - Lessons from the Wrongfully Convicted

29 Pages Posted: 25 Oct 2007 Last revised: 25 Mar 2008

John H. Blume III

Cornell Law School

Abstract

This article examines challenges the conventional wisdom that an innocent defendants will testify on their own behalf at trial. Data gathered from the cases of persons subsequently exonerated due to DNA evidence demonstrates that factually innocent defendants do not testify on their own behalf at substantially higher rates than criminal defendants generally. Why' The primary reason is that many of these individuals had been previously convicted of a crime, and they did not testify at trial because of the risk that their credibility would be impeached with evidence of the prior record and, despite any limiting instruction the court might give, the jury would infer that they were guilty based on their prior misdeeds. Because the current legal regime discourages defendants, even factually innocent defendants from telling their story at trial, the law should be changed. Only prior convictions for perjury should be potentially available for impeachment purposes.

Suggested Citation

Blume, John H., The Dilemma of the Criminal Defendant With a Prior Record - Lessons from the Wrongfully Convicted. Journal of Empirical Studies, Forthcoming; Cornell Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-017. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1014181

John H. Blume III (Contact Author)

Cornell Law School ( email )

Myron Taylor Hall
Cornell University
Ithaca, NY 14853-4901
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
253
Rank
100,901
Abstract Views
1,867