Do Bits Really Work? Revisiting the Empirical Link between Investment Treaties and Foreign Direct Investment
32 Pages Posted: 18 Sep 2007
Date Written: October 2007
Abstract
In this article I replicate, expand, and critique an earlier analysis by Neumayer and Spess claiming to have identified strong evidence that developing countries that sign bilateral investment treaties (BITs) enjoy massive increases in foreign direct investment (FDI). In the face of a series of relatively small but very justifiable changes in methodology and model specification the apparently positive effect of BITs on FDI largely (and in some cases entirely) falls from statistical significance. I conclude that the case for BITs is far weaker than Neumayer and Spess suggest.
Keywords: BITs bilateral investment treaties, FDI foreign direct investment
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960-2000
By Zachary Elkins, Andrew T. Guzman, ...
-
Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960-2000
By Beth A. Simmons, Zachary Elkins, ...
-
Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960-2000
By Beth A. Simmons, Andrew T. Guzman, ...
-
Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Increase Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries?
By Eric Neumayer and Laura Spess
-
Do Double Taxation Treaties Increase Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries?
-
On Waves, Clusters, and Diffusion: A Conceptual Framework
By Beth A. Simmons and Zachary Elkins