Diversification and Value-at-Risk
29 Pages Posted: 20 Sep 2007 Last revised: 24 Sep 2008
Date Written: September 22, 2008
Abstract
A pervasive and puzzling feature of banks' Value at Risk (VaR) is its abnormally high level, which leads to excessive regulatory capital. A possible explanation for the tendency of commercial banks to overstate their VaR is that they incompletely account for the diversification effect among broad risk categories (e.g. equity, interest rate, commodity, credit spread, and foreign exchange). By underestimating the diversification effect, bank's proprietary VaR models produce overly prudent market risk assessments. In this paper, we examine empirically the validity of this hypothesis using actual VaR data from major US commercial banks. In contrast to the VaR diversification hypothesis, we find that US banks show no sign of systematic underestimation of the diversification effect. In particular, diversification effect used by banks is very close to (and quite often larger than) our empirical diversification estimates. A direct implication of this finding is that individual VaRs for each broad risk category, just like aggregate VaRs, are biased risk assessments.
Keywords: Value-at-Risk, Diversification, Correlation, Sources of Risk
JEL Classification: G21, G28, G32
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
How Accurate are Value-at-Risk Models at Commercial Banks
By Jeremy Berkowitz and James M. O'brien
-
The Predictive Ability of Several Models of Exchange Rate Volatility
By Kenneth D. West and Dongchul Cho
-
Bank Capital and Value at Risk
By Patricia Jackson, David Maude, ...
-
Bank Capital Requirements for Market Risk: The Internal Models Approach
By Darryll Hendricks and Beverly Hirtle