Fiscal Centralization, Limited Government, and Public Revenues in Europe, 1650-1913
Journal of Economic History, Vol. 69, No. 1
68 Pages Posted: 25 Sep 2007 Last revised: 6 May 2020
Date Written: June 26, 2008
Abstract
Old Regime polities typically suffered from fiscal fragmentation and absolutist rule. By the start of World War I, however, many such countries had centralized institutions and limited government. This paper uses a new panel or time-series cross-section (TSCS) data set to perform a two-part statistical analysis of political regimes and public revenues in Europe from 1650 to 1913. Panel regressions indicate that centralized and/or limited regimes were associated with significantly higher revenues than fragmented and absolutist ones. Structural break tests also suggest close relationships between major turning points in revenue series and political transformations.
JEL Classification: N23, P48, O16
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN
Recommended Papers
-
Globalization and Capital Markets
By Maurice Obstfeld and Alan M. Taylor
-
The Gold Standard as a `Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval'
By Michael D. Bordo and Hugh Rockoff
-
Crises Now and then: What Lessons from the Last Era of Financial Globalization
-
The Great Depression as a Watershed: International Capital Mobility Over the Long Run
By Maurice Obstfeld and Alan M. Taylor
-
Currency Mismatches, Debt Intolerance and Original Sin: Why They are Not the Same and Why it Matters
By Barry Eichengreen, Ricardo Hausmann, ...
-
Emerging Market Spreads: Then Versus Now
By Yishay Yafeh, Nathan Sussman, ...
-
Emerging Market Spreads: Then Versus Now
By Paolo Mauro, Nathan Sussman, ...
-
Emerging Market Spreads: Then Versus Now
By Paolo Mauro, Nathan Sussman, ...
-
By Michael D. Bordo and Finn Kydland
-
Sovereign Risk, Credibility and the Gold Standard: 1870-1913 Versus 1925-31
By Maurice Obstfeld and Alan M. Taylor
