Property Rights in a Very Poor Country: Tenure Insecurity and Investment in Ethiopia
31 Pages Posted: 20 Apr 2016
Date Written: September 1, 2007
Abstract
This paper provides evidence from one of the poorest countries of the world that the property rights matter for efficiency, investment, and growth. With all land state-owned, the threat of land redistribution never appears far off the agenda. Land rental and leasing have been made legal, but transfer rights remain restricted and the perception of continuing tenure insecurity remains quite strong. Using a unique panel data set, this study investigates whether transfer rights and tenure insecurity affect household investment decisions, focusing on trees and shrubs. The panel data estimates suggest that limited perceived transfer rights, and the threat of expropriation, negatively affect long-term investment in Ethiopian agriculture, contributing to the low returns from land and perpetuating low growth and poverty.
Keywords: Common Property Resource Development, Forestry, Municipal Housing and Land, Rural Development Knowledge & Information Systems, Urban Housing
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Tenure Security and Land-Related Investment: Evidence from Ethiopia
By Klaus Deininger, Songqing Jin, ...
-
Land Sales and Rental Markets in Transition: Evidence from Rural Vietnam
By Klaus Deininger and Songqing Jin
-
Investment and Income Effects of Land Regularization: The Case of Nicaragua
-
‘Best Practice’ Options for the Legal Recognition of Customary Tenure
-
By Daniel Ayalew Ali, Klaus Deininger, ...
-
Legal Knowledge and Economic Development: The Case of Land Rights in Uganda
By Klaus Deininger, Daniel Ayalew, ...
-
Evolving Tenure Rights and Agricultural Intensification in Southwestern Burkina Faso
By Michael Kevane and Leslie Gray
-
Do Overlapping Property Rights Reduce Agricultural Investment? Evidence from Uganda
By Klaus Deininger and Daniel Ayalew Ali