Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

The Reciprocal Relationship between Private Label Use and Store
Loyalty

51 Pages Posted: 25 Sep 2007 Last revised: 22 Sep 2012

Kusum L. Ailawadi

Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth

Koen H. Pauwels

Ozyegin University

Jan‐Benedict EM Steenkamp

University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Marketing Area

Date Written: May 1, 2007

Abstract

Does private label use drive store loyalty at the individual household level? This question is important to retailers, as they decide how much to push private labels over national brands, and to national brand manufacturers, as they look for effective ways to both cooperate with and compete with retailers. Yet, empirical evidence of the association between private label use and store loyalty is both limited and mixed. In this study, we develop an econometric model of the relationship between a household's private label share and share of wallet. The model includes major drivers of these two behaviors and controls for simultaneity and non-linearity in the relationship between them. It is estimated using a unique dataset that combines complete purchase records of a panel of Dutch households with demographic and psychographic data. We estimate the model for two leading chains in the Netherlands - the leading service chain with a well-defined private label strategy and the leading value chain with a less differentiated private label program.

We find that private label share significantly affects share of wallet and vice versa at the service chain, and both effects are strongly non-linear in the form of an inverted U. In contrast, the association between the two constructs at the value chain is much weaker and, if anything, is driven by the effect of share of wallet on private label share. The implications of this research are very important. Service retailers with a well-differentiated private label program can reap the benefits of a virtuous cycle - greater private label share increases share of wallet and greater share of wallet increases private label share. But, this virtuous cycle only operates to a point, and interestingly, private label share levels appear to have already exceeded that point. Further, just having a private label offering does not ensure the virtuous cycle. Value chains positioned on price without a well-differentiated private label do not get a loyalty benefit from private label.

Keywords: private label share, store loyalty, share of wallet, simultaneity, non-linear effects

Suggested Citation

Ailawadi, Kusum L. and Pauwels, Koen H. and Steenkamp, Jan‐Benedict EM, The Reciprocal Relationship between Private Label Use and Store Loyalty (May 1, 2007). Tuck School of Business Working Paper No. 2007-38. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1016842 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1016842

Kusum L. Ailawadi (Contact Author)

Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth ( email )

100 Tuck Hall
Hanover, NH 03755
United States
603-646-2845 (Phone)
603-646-1308 (Fax)

Koen H. Pauwels

Ozyegin University ( email )

Kusbakisi Cd. No: 2
Altunizade, Uskudar
Istanbul, 34662
Turkey

HOME PAGE: http://www.marketdashboards.com

Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp

University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Marketing Area ( email )

CB 3490
Chapel Hill, NC 27599
United States
919-962-9579 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.kenan-flagler.unc.edu/Faculty/search/detail.cfm?person_id=860

Paper statistics

Downloads
718
Rank
28,531
Abstract Views
2,532