Elements of a Neo-Veblenian Theory of the Individual
Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. XLIII, No. 1, pp. 189-214. 2009
20 Pages Posted: 1 Oct 2007 Last revised: 13 Nov 2011
Date Written: September 28, 2007
Abstract
Neuroeconomics and behavioral economics belong to the most dynamic fields in contemporary economics. However, from the viewpoint of economic methodology (Ross, Pesendorfer et al.) there are still substantial reasons why they are totally irrelevant for economic theory. This paper argues that they will only become an essential part of economics if they are embedded into a fully-fledged institutional and evolutionary paradigm. I develop a Neo-Veblenian theory of the individual that starts out from the observation that modern brain sciences do not support the notion of the brain to be an integrated and consistent rational decision apparatus. An evolutionary explanation is offered for this, which reinstates Veblen's distinction between adaptation as engineering optima and social selection. Individual identity does only emerge through communication and interaction among brains, in particular via language. The concept of the "extended brain" is proposed, which is applied to define human individuality as a social phenomenon. Thus, the systematic unity of neuroeconomics and institutional economics is established.
Keywords: neuroeconomics, modularity of the brain, neural darwinism, identity, extended brain, collective intentionality, emotions and institutions
JEL Classification: A12, B52, D00
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Economic Agent: Not Human, But Important
By Don Ross
-
Institutions, Distributed Cognition and Agency: Rule-Following as Performative Action
-
Dopamine and Reward Prediction Error: An Axiomatic Approach to Neuroeconomics
By Andrew Caplin and Mark Dean
-
The Naturalistic Turn in Economics: Implications for the Theory of Finance
-
Entropy, Function and Evolution: Naturalizing Peircian Semiosis
-
Deducing Principles of Economics from Ontological Constraints on Information