Gresham's Law of Political Communication: How Citizens Respond to Conflicting Information
34 Pages Posted: 29 Sep 2007 Last revised: 17 May 2011
Date Written: May 17, 2011
Abstract
Although citizens are often exposed to conflicting communications from political elites, few studies examine the effects of conflicting information on the quality of citizens’ decisions. Thus, I conduct experiments in which subjects are exposed to conflicting information before making decisions that affect their future welfare. The results suggest that a version of Gresham’s Law operates in the context of political communication. When a credible source of information suggests the welfare-improving choice and a less credible source simultaneously suggests a choice that will make subjects worse off, subjects make worse decisions than when only the credible source is available. This occurs because subjects base their decisions upon the less credible source or forego participation. This occurs mostly among unsophisticated subjects, who are more easily led astray. These findings reveal important limits to the effectiveness of credible information sources and suggest how political campaigns might strategically use conflicting information to their benefit.
Keywords: communication, conflicting information, decision making, sophistication, laboratory experiment, trust, endorsement, credibility
JEL Classification: C9, C90, C91, D72, D81, D80, D83
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Predictably Incoherent Judgments
By Cass R. Sunstein, Daniel Kahneman, ...
-
Patience as a Political Virtue: Delayed Gratification and Turnout
By James H. Fowler and Cindy D. Kam
-
Tom Sawyer and the Construction of Value
By Dan Ariely, George Loewenstein, ...
-
Jurors are Competent Cue-Takers: How Institutions Substitute for Legal Sophistication
-
Nothing But the Truth? Experiments on Adversarial Competition, Expert Testimony, and Decision Making
-
Making Citizens Smart: When Do Institutions Improve Unsophisticated Citizens' Decisions?
-
The Blind Leading the Blind: Who Gets Polling Information and Does it Improve Decisions?
-
Indignation: Psychology, Politics, Law
By Daniel Kahneman and Cass R. Sunstein