The First Amendment and Commercial Speech

Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 84, p. 981, 2009

Liberté d'Expression en Europe et aux Etats - Unis, Dalloz, 2008

U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 07-42

18 Pages Posted: 6 Oct 2007 Last revised: 10 Jan 2010

Edwin Baker

University of Pennsylvania Law School (Deceased)

Abstract

After a quick summary of constitutional treatment of commercial speech, this essay outlines four reasons why commercial speech should be denied First Amendment protection. Working from the claim that the primary rationale for constitutional protection of speech is the mandate that government respect individual freedom or autonomy, the essay argues: 1) that the individual does not choose, but rather the market dictates the content of commercial speech; 2) that the commercial speech should be attributed to an artificial, instrumentally entity - the business enterprise - rather than the flesh and blood person whose liberty merits protection; 3) market exchanges involve the exercise of power, not the expression of values and solidarities, and exercises of power should always be subject to legal regulation. 4) The essay also recommends denying protection on the basis of a theory of speech freedom that focuses on protection of dissent.

Keywords: commercial speech, free speech, First Amendment, autonomy, dissent

Suggested Citation

Baker, Edwin, The First Amendment and Commercial Speech. Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 84, p. 981, 2009; Liberté d'Expression en Europe et aux Etats - Unis, Dalloz, 2008; U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 07-42. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1019264

C. Edwin Baker (Contact Author)

University of Pennsylvania Law School (Deceased)

United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
420
Rank
54,899
Abstract Views
1,640