Punishment and Counter-punishment in Public Good Games: Can We Still Govern Ourselves?
Posted: 18 Oct 2007
There are 2 versions of this paper
Punishment and Counter-Punishment in Public Good Games: Can We Still Govern Ourselves?
Abstract
A number of experimental studies have shown that the opportunity to punish anti-social behavior increases cooperation levels when agents face a social dilemma. Using a public good experiment, I show that in the presence of counter-punishment opportunities cooperators are less willing to punish free riders. As a result, cooperation breaks down and groups have lower earnings in comparison to a treatment without punishments where free riding is predominant. Approximately one quarter of all punishments are retaliated. Counter-punishments appear to be driven partly by strategic considerations and partly by a desire to reciprocate punishments.
Keywords: public goods, counter-punishment, decentralized punishment, freeriding
JEL Classification: C92, D70, H41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Paper statistics
Recommended Papers
-
The Effect of Rewards and Sanctions in Provision of Public Goods
By Martin Sefton, Robert Shupp, ...
-
The Effect of Rewards and Sanctions in Provision of Public Goods
By Martin Sefton, Robert Shupp, ...
-
Driving Forces Behind Informal Sanctions
By Armin Falk, Ernst Fehr, ...
-
Driving Forces of Informal Sanctions
By Armin Falk, Ernst Fehr, ...
-
Punishing Free-Riders: How Group Size Affects Mutual Monitoring and the Provision of Public Goods
-
Social Preferences, Beliefs, and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Good Experiments
By Urs Fischbacher and Simon Gaechter
-
Voluntary Association in Public Goods Experiments: Reciprocity, Mimicry and Efficiency
By Talbot Page, Louis Putterman, ...
-
The Carrot or the Stick: Rewards, Punishments and Cooperation
By James Andreoni, William T. Harbaugh, ...
